Russian CPU

[WaterFlex]

http://translate.google.ru/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcst.ru%2Fb_36-37.shtml&sl=ru&tl=en&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8

Translated link above.

1.
AMD Athlon 64 2,211 ГГц (2003) — 840 Mflops
Intel Core 2 Duo 2,4 ГГц (2006) — 1,3 Gflops.

2.
THIS CPUs are low speed -150-500MHz only and have 4,9 Gflops and more. AND ! <1watt!

Doesnt need even passive cooling ! :eek:

http://translate.google.ru/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcst.ru%2Fb_14-15.shtml&sl=ru&tl=en&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8

Ahahaha. Just imagine : AMD&Intel vs Russia

[ChaosMinionX]

I don't understand :confused:

[ReverendMaynard]

Neither AMD or Intel care about this.

[Splave]

MCST-R500, I read 170mflops

[ReverendMaynard]

I read RISC and that means it's useless to this forum :)

[Chumbucket843]

i thought core 2 duo was 48 gflops? why dont you compare it to core i7? it gets 140gflops.

[ReverendMaynard]

i thought core 2 duo was 48 gflops? why dont you compare it to core i7? it gets 140gflops.

apparently the OP doesn't know what this processor is intended for, or that it's a Reduced Instruction Set Computer part that can do simple things very fast but useless other wise.

[SpuTnicK]

It sucks

[Ket]

I am completely....... unimpressed. Its like somebody trying to say their calculator has more power than a quad core :ROTF:

[zalbard]

http://www.spec.org/cpu95/results/cint95.html
Just a random example from the top: http://www.spec.org/cpu95/results/res2000q2/cpu95-20000331-04207.html
Ancient rig. 1 Ghz Athlon.
SPECint95 = 42.9.
The one from the OP has 2 CPU.
SPECint95 = 20. So 10 per CPU...
Pretty horrible.