View Full Version : TEC Question
Ranger2992
11-17-2003, 04:14 AM
Right now I am running a swiftech with an 80W TEC on my VC. I haven't volt modded yet and I am able to hit 510 on the core. I will be Vmodding the card in a couple of weeks and am wondering if the 80W is going to be enough to keep it cool. I would really like to get above 530 on the core. So with this in mind, I have a couple of questions.
1) I will be using chilled water (I am making a chiller), will the 80W be enough?
2) Should I switch to a 172W to get the higher clocks? This will require me to buy another mean well and probably a different waterblock.
Any opinions or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
How cold is the water going to be? If its -20 or below, you may aswell throw the tec away, you will get better temps with just chilled water.
What tec waterblock you got at the minute? The mcw50t will take a 172watt tec no problems, its better than the 80w even at low voltages since the efficency is higher.
]JR[
Ranger2992
11-17-2003, 04:23 AM
Yeah i have the MCW50T. I am hoping for -10C or so for the chilled water. To get to 510 on my core with the 80W I fill my Res with ice. I don't know what it drops the temp down to on the VC, but it drops the temp on my CPU using the MCW462UT down to -20C and allows me to hit 4Ghz :D
I am hoping with the chilled water I can get 530 on the core. Do you think it's possible with a Vmod?
Probably. Ive just ran some simulations of the 80w vs the 172w modules given the same parameters (20c hotside cooling, 50watt heatsource)
80w module
Input power: 79.89watts (4.7amps 17volts)
Total Hotside load: 131.65watts
Object temp: 11.2c
172w module
Input power: 79.48watts (6.1amps 13volts)
Total Hotside load: 132.51watts
Object temp: 4.8c
So for the same power the 172w module is 6.4c cooler. Ill just do it for -10c water, instead of 20c...
]JR[
80w module
hotside load 133.48watts @ 17v
object temp: -11.4c
172w module
hotside load 134.87 @ 13v
object temp: -19.6c
So starting to pull away even more 8.2c difference.
]JR[
Ranger2992
11-17-2003, 04:35 AM
Wow you just plug the numbers into a database and it tells you how it will perform. That's awesome.
Why is it my CPU temp gets to -20C using ice in my Res? Is the 226W TEC that much better? When i use a wattage output calculator it shows my CPU at over 150W at 4Ghz. Add that with the 226W TEC and it's some serious heat going into the water. When I measure my water temp without ice after an hour or so my water temp is a little over 100F yet I am still able to sit at about 3C idle and 10C full load.
I am still trying to figure these damn TECs out :D
Ranger2992
11-17-2003, 04:36 AM
Originally posted by ]JR[
80w module
hotside load 133.48watts @ 17v
object temp: -11.4c
172w module
hotside load 134.87 @ 13v
object temp: -19.6c
So starting to pull away even more 8.2c difference.
]JR[
The 80W runs at 13V....I thought the 172W was supposed to be at 17V??
The 80w and 172w the simulator uses are both 24v. Its pretty irrelevant its the watts that matter ;)
That wattage calculator (if its the one i think it is) is rather inaccurate, I would suggest 125-135watts depending on voltage.
The 220w figure (q) is achieved when dT = 0, i.e where there is no longer a use for having a tec in the system.
100f is 36c? so your running 36c water and getting around 6.5c temps, hmm.
My software tells me a 220w running @ 12v to get 6.5c would be cooling an 85w heatload.
]JR[
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.