Mikeguava breaks 50k in 05

[Sampsa]

Either I'm blind or I just can't seem to find a thread/any information about Mikeguava breaking 50000 points in 3DMark05? :confused:

http://www.futuremark.com/community/halloffame/3dmark05/

First of all Mike, huge congrats on breaking the magical 50k milestone :clap:

Can you share the clock speeds / settings / screenshot of this WR run?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4871079

I also have couple of questions:

- Was this done with 975 high leakage CPU from Intel?

- Is there a performance difference in 05 between 975 D0 ES chip vs 975 D0 retail chip? Andre Yang's 48,7k score (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=855909) is done CPU @ 5460 MHz, I wonder how high you were running the CPU.. +5,6 GHz? :shocked:

Anyway, truly a sick score once again.

[Pt1t]

:D yes little 5.6 ... i heard also sub 7 1M is done on i7.

BTW congrats Mikeguava for this score (WR)

[Viss]

Uncore :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3808045&postcount=127

[perkam]

Either I'm blind or I just can't seem to find a thread/any information about Mikeguava breaking 50000 points in 3DMark05? :confused:

http://www.futuremark.com/community/halloffame/3dmark05/

First of all Mike, huge congrats on breaking the magical 50k milestone :clap:

Can you share the clock speeds / settings / screenshot of this WR run?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4871079

I also have couple of questions:

- Was this done with 975 high leakage CPU from Intel?

- Is there a performance difference in 05 between 975 D0 ES chip vs 975 D0 retail chip? Andre Yang's 48,7k score (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=855909) is done CPU @ 5460 MHz, I wonder how high you were running the CPU.. +5,6 GHz? :shocked:

Anyway, truly a sick score once again.Usually this works best when the OCer himself comes and posts information.

We know he did it, but we dont have any screenies :(

But congrats on the 50K :up: :banana: :banana: :banana: :woot:

Perkam

[tiborrr]

Simply amazing numbers :up:

[leonarderman]

Usually this works best when the OCer himself comes and posts information.

We know he did it, but we dont have any screenies :(

But congrats on the 50K :up: :banana: :banana: :banana: :woot:

Perkam


I know the soft that can tweak easily the 3DMark05 scores. So I can get higher 50k scores on system Phenom II 5GHz. But, I'm not cheater! :shrug:

Someone just recognize the new WR if they see some pics................ :D

[Sampsa]

I know the soft that can tweak easily the 3DMark05 scores. So I can get higher 50k scores on system Phenom II 5GHz. But, I'm not cheater! :shrug:

Someone just recognize the new WR if they see some pics................ :D

This result was most definitely not done with any software.. so please keep such BS out from this thread.

[Foamy]

50K is impressive !! congrats!:D

[sofos1990]

Congrats!!! 50k? That's awesome!!!:D

[FUGGER]

Grats Mike, very nice chip

[BenchZowner]

I know the soft that can tweak easily the 3DMark05 scores. So I can get higher 50k scores on system Phenom II 5GHz. But, I'm not cheater! :shrug:

Someone just recognize the new WR if they see some pics................ :D

edit by runmc -I agree but speak in a polite manner please. :)

[Movieman]

Mike seems to be the quiet type from the one time I met him.
Not given to boasting, just goes to work and lets the numbers speak for themselves.
Also an infectious smile that lights up a room.
One of the people I was very glad to have met at Charles party in January.

[runmc]

Congrats Mike :up:

[The-Fox]

As I used to say, "silent but violent" :D

Congrats on the score Mike :clap:

[Brian y.]

Mike seems to be the quiet type from the one time I met him.
Not given to boasting, just goes to work and lets the numbers speak for themselves.
Also an infectious smile that lights up a room.
One of the people I was very glad to have met at Charles party in January.
I second that. I had the pleasure to meet Mike at GOOC and he is definitely one really cool guy. One of the true ol' school overclockers out there.:bows:

Great work on the 50K 05 score Mike:up:

[LowRun]

Congrats for passing that new milestone :clap:

[[XC] gomeler]

Awesome score Mike :up:

[kemo]

I would thing that the CPU clock is greater than 5.7GHZ judging from the previous 47K run and it might be the same CPU as well

and also FUGGER is on 49246 3DMarks with 295GTX and probably with stock cooling on GPUs , i call that more impressive

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4876640

[blind_ripper]

nice work mike ;), congrats on breaking that 50k.

@ sampsa: no IM blind :D.

[NeoForce]

Awesome! Congrats!

[AndreYang]

Some guys have secrets for 05, but it doesn't cheat. It's a real score.

[TheGoat Eater]

I believe Mike holds true to Teddy Roosevelt's moto of "walk softy and carry a big stick"

[tiborrr]

Mike seems to be the quiet type from the one time I met him.
Not given to boasting, just goes to work and lets the numbers speak for themselves.
Also an infectious smile that lights up a room.
One of the people I was very glad to have met at Charles party in January.
I agree with you Sir! I was lucky enough to had a chance to meet Mike at last year's Cebit. You could have talk for hours and hours, he's trully a versatile guy! :up:

Mike, once again - congrats! :clap:

[G0ldBr1ck]

Very impresive, congrats!. Been wondering why we havent heard much on this.

[over@locker886]

Huge score!:shocked: Congrats!:up:

[k|ngp|n]

Very big number Mike...good job on the solo work :clap:

[TheGoat Eater]

I thought this was relevant LOL -

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/1408/ludicrousthumb.gif

[DMH]

Huge congrat's why doesn't he come and shows a screen?:D

[LardArse]

Gratz Mikey, always proud to fly the XS flag as well. :)

[hicookie]

a huge score, mike , congrates!

[Gautam]

Mike, as I've been telling you, this is a really really big deal. :D

05 has always held a special place in your heart, so it's only fitting that the one to break the mighty 50K barrier is you. Congratulations my friend. :toast: :clap:

[dinos22]

congrats
impressive score
we need some details now :D

[ViViD]

Great Score & Huge Number :D WOW It Almost In My Dream:D
Where's The Mike To Tell Us Story Of Breaking Record?

[rdrash]

:shocked: Amazing score... Congrats for the milestone :clap:

[mike]

Thanks everyone!!! Been fun pushing 3DMark05 again after a long time of absense doing 3D benches. The CPU is actually a lucky find - thought I give Fugger a bit of heat with his gem.

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/8936/50kcmx.jpg (http://img41.imageshack.us/my.php?image=50kcmx.jpg)

Been starting to do some 3DMark06 in the last few days - it's a whole new learning curve there. My CPU is really really strong on 2 of the 4 cores, but is struggleing running all cores with HT enabled.

[mike]

Either I'm blind or I just can't seem to find a thread/any information about Mikeguava breaking 50000 points in 3DMark05? :confused:

http://www.futuremark.com/community/halloffame/3dmark05/

First of all Mike, huge congrats on breaking the magical 50k milestone :clap:

Can you share the clock speeds / settings / screenshot of this WR run?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4871079

I also have couple of questions:

- Was this done with 975 high leakage CPU from Intel?

- Is there a performance difference in 05 between 975 D0 ES chip vs 975 D0 retail chip? Andre Yang's 48,7k score (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=855909) is done CPU @ 5460 MHz, I wonder how high you were running the CPU.. +5,6 GHz? :shocked:

Anyway, truly a sick score once again.

Thanks Sampsa
I aquired this CPU from a friend from overseas but I have no direct comparison with a retail CPU, but I have ordered a retail 975 and shall be able to give you comparison next week. Your estimate was on the money - tiny bit below 5.6GHZ.
But what I can say is that I cannot match match AndreYangs 06 speed with his retail Xeon 3540 with my CPU - unless I would go very very nutty with vcore. So finding a CPU of ANdre's caliber without the multiplier restriction will be the mission


Uncore :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3808045&postcount=127

Unfortunately I cannot match Fuggers godly uncore and was running only at 5ghz uncore. My CPU does not appear to like to high uncore voltage at that speed and causes slight instability


@ Leonarderman
Cheating??? Lol - no need to play tricks at 5.6ghz :p: But please let me have your books of tricks for 06 - I could use some help there :up:

[TheGoat Eater]

Congrats again Mike :up: - that's a screenie worth drooling over

[Vapor]

Sick, sick stuff Mike :slobber:

50k is huge, the CPU is a monster, and it's just a great and efficient score on top of that :clap:

Hats off to you :bows:

[mike]

:D yes little 5.6 ... i heard also sub 7 1M is done on i7.

BTW congrats Mikeguava for this score (WR)

Thanks! I haven't attempted any 1m Pi yet - but I saw Charles screeny - hopefully I will find a bit more headroom on the top clocks to get near that time as well.

@ Perkam thanks

@Tiborr, thanks! Was very nice meeting you too last year! Hopefully our paths will cross soon again and we can chat for hours :up:

@ FoamGlas, Sofos1990, Fugger, runmc, The-Fox, LowRun, BlindRipper, NeoForce, The Goat Eater, G0ldbr1ck, over@locker,KingPin, DMH, Dinos22, VIVID, rdrash and LardArse - many many thanks!

@Movieman - thanks for the props and backing me up while I have been not seeing the thread. Awesome meeting and chatting with you too!


@ Kingpin - many thanks - congrats to your crazy Phenomenal results too!!! Insane benching there!

@ Gautam - thanks a lot - you're are right - the 05 benchmarks have always held a special place in my hard both the PCMark and 3DMark. Time to venture out a bit more. 06 is a growing on me by the minute

@Brian.y - thanks - the pleasure was all mine meeting you at the GOOC

@ [XC] Gomeler - thanks - awesome scores you did at AMD as well - and stop giving me hell at PCMarks!

@ AndreYang - thanks for the backing - and congrats again for your insane 3540 results - crazy clocking there!!!

@ HiCookie - thanks again - awesome finally meeting you at GOOC - we need to chat soon again!

@ Vapor - thanks man - I tried to do my best at 05 - efficiency is even better with triple 4890s ;). Actually could have run quiet a bit tigher with memory, GPU etc. , but was a bit in a rush on this score.

[hipro5]

:up: ;)

[SF3D]

Incredible 05 run Mike! I am glad, that it was you who did it :up:

[Sampsa]

Mike, thanks for the screenshot and details everyone was eagerly waiting, keep up the good work :)

[Oliver]

congrats man , thats a killer run u got there with the match

keep pushing it

[leonarderman]

@ Leonarderman
Cheating??? Lol - no need to play tricks at 5.6ghz :p: But please let me have your books of tricks for 06 - I could use some help there :up:

Do you see I said "you're cheater"? No no no. I didn't say that. Do you understand? you can see my post at previous page.

I said "I'm not cheater". I didn't say "You are cheater". Okie?

Everybody here want to see some of your pics. Me too!

Now I see, congrats man! :D

@sampa: you didn't understand what I said! Sorry! ;)

[Monstru]

Astonishing result!!!

This is one hell of a CPU, thank God it didn't get ~5,4 Uncore, or else it would have been completly pointelss to bench some benchmarks from now on :D

One quick question - I understand you are playing 2k6 now. How is HT on, lower clocks versus HT off, higher clocks working for you, performance wise?

[GeorgeStorm]

Incredible score.
Thats amazing efficiency, completely smashed the WR, are the gpu's at stock?

[crustytheclown]

Great score mike incredible oc there man!!!

[before]

Congrats my friend :toast:

[boblemagnifique]

Thanks everyone!!! Been fun pushing 3DMark05 again after a long time of absense doing 3D benches. The CPU is actually a lucky find - thought I give Fugger a bit of heat with his gem.

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/8936/50kcmx.jpg (http://img41.imageshack.us/my.php?image=50kcmx.jpg)

Been starting to do some 3DMark06 in the last few days - it's a whole new learning curve there. My CPU is really really strong on 2 of the 4 cores, but is struggleing running all cores with HT enabled.

Ouch Impressive Cpu Mike & congratz for your scoree :D

5.6ghz at 1.68v :eek: it's crazy !!

Have you a batch please under your 975XE ? thk

[[XC] gomeler]

Awesome screenshot. Now if only retail 975s were capable of doing that :D Crossing my fingers when I swipe the credit card to get something close to yours :p:

[tiborrr]

I wrote a news about your achievement, Mike!
http://www.oc-lab.si/novice.php?n=781

Best Regards,
N.

[crio]

Ηοlly cheese......
That cpu is simly insane.Amazing score man.....What more can i say....I am drooling right now

[A2C]

nice score, congratulations :up:
i little envy :clap:

[G H Z]

Smokin run Mike :toast:

[mike]

@ hipro - thanks for the thumbs up - I am sure you'll tear these scores apart soon - hopefully I can see some more heat from you and your fellow greak benchers at the PCmarks soon.

@ SF3D - I appretiate your support a lot.

@ Sampsa - I will give a lot more details next week when I have some more time and can analyze my 2 weeks of nonstop benching

@ Oliver - thanks - and I will keep pushing it a bit further soon!

@ leonarderman - sorry - my apologies - I did not read your comment properly - sorry again

@ Monstru - thanks _ Intel really stepped up their game with the D0 revision of the I7 - I am sure we'll get to see more insane results from many people in the near future

@ GeorgeStorm - thanks - I always enjoyed 05 as Gautam has mentioned earlier, but the entire benchmark has become more and more of a 3DMark01 style bench and it certainly takes less use of todays overpowered GPUs for 1024 res benchmarking and more use of CPU power - hence I was able to run the X2 at near stock speeds without taking much of a score hit. I had actually clocked the cards down for this bench to insure GPU stability. If I recall correctly around 770/940. I actually suspect that some of todays cards are struggling tremendously with memory clocks at 05 as soon as they are faced with high bandwidth

@ tiborrr - thanks for the note!

@ crio - the D0s truly are insane! Thanks

@ A3C - thanks - no need to envy - sure it'll get smashed any day now

@ GHZ - thanks - can't wait to see some trifire coming from your way!

[mike]

One quick question - I understand you are playing 2k6 now. How is HT on, lower clocks versus HT off, higher clocks working for you, performance wise?

the jury is still out on HT on and off. On the first few comparos I did - it appears that HT enabled will be scoring higher as the gap of clocks is not as wide as I expected. At he moment I am only able to bench about 50 -80mhz higher with HT disabled - and in this case HT enabled scores about 500points more. If I can find a way to significantly raise HT-off clocks it might turn scores around in favor to HT disabled. My guess is at about 150mhz CPU clock difference it should be better to turn HT off.
Right now I am nearing 38K in 06 with a Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME ( sweet board on D0s ) and Trifire 4890s - but had a couple of setbacks and I'll give it another go hopefully next week with a retail 975
To me it was interesting to find that the coldbug for HT enabled on my cpu is at a significantly higher temp compared to running without HT

[Monstru]

To me it was interesting to find that the coldbug for HT enabled on my cpu is at a significantly higher temp compared to running without HT


Interesting find, though from all the i7 I was testing the temp really didn't helped as much as with E8600 for instance. You are using any...interesting BIOS on X58 Extreme? The normal bios'es don't favour very high uncore from what I have seen untill now.

[dinos22]

are you saying you can run much lower temps with HT on ????

where is the 38K link :D

[mike]

Interesting find, though from all the i7 I was testing the temp really didn't helped as much as with E8600 for instance. You are using any...interesting BIOS on X58 Extreme? The normal bios'es don't favour very high uncore from what I have seen untill now.

Same thing here - temp is not really helping much at all after a certain point -only hurting...appears to be that the memory controler that is causing the CB
Actually been using just the latest official BIOS F7 dl'd from their site.


are you saying you can run much lower temps with HT on ????

where is the 38K link :D

nope - higher temps - as in warmer.

Question is - where is that 39K link I heard rumors about existing somewhere...

[[XC] gomeler]

Same thing here - temp is not really helping much at all after a certain point -only hurting...appears to be that the memory controler that is causing the CB
Actually been using just the latest official BIOS F7 dl'd from their site.



nope - higher temps - as in warmer.

Question is - where is that 39K link I heard rumors about existing somewhere...

In my basement, along with the HD 5880X2 I've been hiding :p: 38k will be a cake walk once somebody actually pushes these GPUs but 39k would be.. insane.

[AndreYang]

hey man...keep slowly...I tried to match with you.

[Brian y.]

Same thing here - temp is not really helping much at all after a certain point -only hurting...appears to be that the memory controller that is causing the CB...



nope - higher temps - as in warmer.

I have noticed with HT enabled on my 975 I am able to bench more consistently w/o issues at 5.2~5.3GHz range with temps around -65~-75 degrees celsius..it will run all the way up to -115~-120 but ONLY if sub timings are loose and mem mhz is not super high. The only success I have had when running tight subs/high mhz on my memory is warmer temps which makes sense in regards to the IMC being the culprit with CB temps as you have mentioned.

[Monstru]

Actually been using just the latest official BIOS F7 dl'd from their site.

That's nice to hear. Might I ask what PCI-E clocks were you running?

[mike]

That's nice to hear. Might I ask what PCI-E clocks were you running?

I was at around 103 - PCI-E clocks actually are my number 1 priority for the next bench session - I hadn't been able with all voltages stock to go above 105mhz, but maybe after rasing voltages significantly things might improve. Update in a couple of days on that


hey man...keep slowly...I tried to match with you.

everything always very slowly here my friend. I think we will hvae a fun match!!!


gomeler;3818605']In my basement, along with the HD 5880X2 I've been hiding :p: 38k will be a cake walk once somebody actually pushes these GPUs but 39k would be.. insane.

what's your addy - hopefully you don't have too good of an alarm system...



I have noticed with HT enabled on my 975 I am able to bench more consistently w/o issues at 5.2~5.3GHz range with temps around -65~-75 degrees celsius..it will run all the way up to -115~-120 but ONLY if sub timings are loose and mem mhz is not super high. The only success I have had when running tight subs/high mhz on my memory is warmer temps which makes sense in regards to the IMC being the culprit with CB temps as you have mentioned.

Cool - thanks a lot for your feedback on this - yes the IMC is looking more and more like the culprit. nice - 5.2-5.3 range sounds awesome - 5.3GHZ is my range in 06 for the moment. Hopefully clocks will move up with a bit more testing

[F.O.G.N.A.]

Congrats for the milestone Mike :up:

;)

[Turrican]

crazy stuff, congratz.
keep pushing it :toast:

[DeDaL]

05' is one of my favorit games :)

Just awesome score :eek:, big congrats. :clap:

How many cores affinity you set ?

[SoF]

wow mike awesome stuff :slobber: :up:
missed you on cebit this year ;)

[Monstru]

I was at around 103 - PCI-E clocks actually are my number 1 priority for the next bench session - I hadn't been able with all voltages stock to go above 105mhz, but maybe after rasing voltages significantly things might improve. Update in a couple of days on that


I know that has been solved with the unreleased bios on UD4, I don;t know about Extreme. But you will definately need a secret bios (or a hardware mod) to break past 105 PCI-E on X58 Extreme...

[mike]

Congrats for the milestone Mike :up:

;)

thanks a bunch - Intel D0 made it easy


crazy stuff, congratz.
keep pushing it :toast:

:up:
still pushing it hard here



05' is one of my favorit games :)

Just awesome score :eek:, big congrats. :clap:

How many cores affinity you set ?


05 is fun indeed. thanks. Ran 2 cores



wow mike awesome stuff :slobber: :up:
missed you on cebit this year ;)

man - I was so bummed I couldn't get away from work this year - but for sure I'll be back next year around!

[mike]

I know that has been solved with the unreleased bios on UD4, I don;t know about Extreme. But you will definately need a secret bios (or a hardware mod) to break past 105 PCI-E on X58 Extreme...

can't wait to get my hands on it - cause on X58 extreme I am stuck at 221.5 with my retail Xeon 3540

here's a screeny with the gigabyte x58-extreme, 975 running 3dmark06

http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/7962/3723e4.jpg (http://img190.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3723e4.jpg)

[mike]

- Is there a performance difference in 05 between 975 D0 ES chip vs 975 D0 retail chip? Andre Yang's 48,7k score (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=855909) is done CPU @ 5460 MHz, I wonder how high you were running the CPU.. +5,6 GHz? :shocked:


Didn't receive my retail 975 yet - but did some quick comparison clock for clock between the ES 975 and Retail Xeon 3540 - turns out the Xeon appears to be slightly quicker clock for clock. Probably the same is true as it has been in the past; that ES samples often are slower compared to retails.
This probably because of some extra "de-bugging" code in the microcode for developers. Don't know if that is true - just my assumption

[Gautam]

can't wait to get my hands on it - cause on X58 extreme I am stuck at 221.5 with my retail Xeon 3540

here's a screeny with the gigabyte x58-extreme, 975 running 3dmark06


See, 06 ain't that bad. :D :up:

[[XC] gomeler]

:clap:

[dpa]

loving the scores Mike!

seems like 06 LOVES the uncore and memory freq.. at 100Mhz more I score less in cpu test.

is 5.3Ghz max?

[mike]

loving the scores Mike!

seems like 06 LOVES the uncore and memory freq.. at 100Mhz more I score less in cpu test.

is 5.3Ghz max?

5.3ghz is pretty close to the max. I have been able to get some CPU scores at close to 5.4ghz but never been able to complete a good run above that.
BUT now it'll be time to look into getting the card clocks up - my goal is to beat Andre at 100mhz lower :p:

http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/8594/37453corsair.jpg (http://img192.imageshack.us/my.php?image=37453corsair.jpg)



See, 06 ain't that bad. :D :up:


yes it is - especially when you count those endless amounts of runs where I end up crashing at deep freeze....what a fitting name for this test. Wait ten minutes to freeze at the deep freeze...

[Kabauterman]

Hey Mike,

at first congratz to your scores, realy nice CPU what ou got there.

the differenz between max. 05 and max 06 seems a little bit high? I can run 4,95G 06 and 5,0G 05 with my good old C0 XE
but about 300M is realy hard, maybe Boards voltage is not so stable?

[dpa]

5.3ghz is pretty close to the max. I have been able to get some CPU scores at close to 5.4ghz but never been able to complete a good run above that.
BUT now it'll be time to look into getting the card clocks up - my goal is to beat Andre at 100mhz lower :




yes it is - especially when you count those endless amounts of runs where I end up crashing at deep freeze....what a fitting name for this test. Wait ten minutes to freeze at the deep freeze...


oh yeah.. I HATE when the rig just freeze in deep freeze, I lose some motivation every time :(

10min of testing.. BANG.. freeze. :D

what temps are you at?

trying a rampage extreme II later... and LN2 on cards.

[AndreYang]

5.3ghz is pretty close to the max. I have been able to get some CPU scores at close to 5.4ghz but never been able to complete a good run above that.
BUT now it'll be time to look into getting the card clocks up - my goal is to beat Andre at 100mhz lower :p:

http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/8594/37453corsair.jpg (http://img192.imageshack.us/my.php?image=37453corsair.jpg)





yes it is - especially when you count those endless amounts of runs where I end up crashing at deep freeze....what a fitting name for this test. Wait ten minutes to freeze at the deep freeze...


good...:up:


My Quad 4890 CrossfireX result will post soon.;)

[mike]

Hey Mike,

at first congratz to your scores, realy nice CPU what ou got there.

the differenz between max. 05 and max 06 seems a little bit high? I can run 4,95G 06 and 5,0G 05 with my good old C0 XE
but about 300M is realy hard, maybe Boards voltage is not so stable?

Thanks mate!
The difference is so profound in my case that part of the fault lies in a very poor IMC on my CPU, which coldbugs for HT at -80C, yet can run at -120C with only two cores. Voltage is pretty stable - but takes some time to figure out the sweet spots


oh yeah.. I HATE when the rig just freeze in deep freeze, I lose some motivation every time :(

10min of testing.. BANG.. freeze. :D

what temps are you at?

trying a rampage extreme II later... and LN2 on cards.


"HATE" would be an understatement in my case...HHHHHHHHAAAAAAAATTTTTEEEEEEEEe describes my feeling much better. I tried soo many things; lowering gpu clock, gpu memory, sys memory, pci-e clocks etc. etc.

always comes back to me...

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEE EEEEE



good...:up:


My Quad 4890 CrossfireX result will post soon.;)

now I want to beat you with only 2 GPUs and 100mhz lower CPU clocks!!!!!

EDIT - just kidding - your XEON killed me in 06 - hats off Andre! Outstanding benching there!

HUGE CONGRATS on hitting #2 on HWBOT - noone seems to acknoledge the fact that you in yourself are the benchbmark to beat these days! Never backing off and pushing and pushing!!! Next Vince???

[dpa]

http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=305013

loving it..? :)

[mike]

http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=305013

loving it..? :)

argh DPA takes it all.....:up:

[Kabauterman]

Mike, did you deactivate the Cores on BIOS or did you choose them in the Taskmanager?

Because your screeny says 4Core?

[dpa]

argh DPA takes it all.....:up:

Just got myself a flexiriser :D.. what am I up to...? hehehe..

*ops.. another 4890 card..?*

on LN2... ? :D

Come on Mike, give us 5.4Ghz!!

[mike]

Mike, did you deactivate the Cores on BIOS or did you choose them in the Taskmanager?

Because your screeny says 4Core?

Taskmanager :D


Just got myself a flexiriser :D.. what am I up to...? hehehe..

*ops.. another 4890 card..?*

on LN2... ? :D

Come on Mike, give us 5.4Ghz!!

working on 5.4ghz - just found a nice little retail 950 - that should do the job very well. Pssst 38k has already fallen but don't tell Andre ;)

[dinos22]

nice work fellas

:up:

[dpa]

Taskmanager :D



working on 5.4ghz - just found a nice little retail 950 - that should do the job very well. Pssst 38k has already fallen but don't tell Andre ;)

I want that screen mike.. :D 950 @ 5.4Ghz.. no suprise..

[AndreYang]

Taskmanager :D



working on 5.4ghz - just found a nice little retail 950 - that should do the job very well. Pssst 38k has already fallen but don't tell Andre ;)



I HEARD........

[Vivi]

andre and I know of higher tho, dont we andre? :)

[dpa]

I need to set benching in fifth gear I see...