View Full Version : 27399 with 9500@9700!!??!??
hmmm
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7213743
someone has really done a great job there or...
note: thats not me
bowman1964
11-11-2003, 07:46 AM
well you get aprom... 21 points per fps in nature...so he has a nature alone score of 13155 not bad...
just incase anyone wanted to know thats is about what nature will give you per fps...21
interman
11-11-2003, 08:01 AM
i suspect that score will be gone pretty soon ;)
bit dodgy there :eek:
615fps in nature tho.... :slobber:
maybe some tweaked drivers which disable stuff can make it?o.O
macci
11-11-2003, 10:11 AM
high quality tests, 1FPS = 20Marks
Low quality tests, 1FPS = 10Marks
Marquzz
11-11-2003, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by macci
high quality tests, 1FPS = 20Marks
Low quality tests, 1FPS = 10Marks
Ok, and nature 21p/fps then?
macci
11-11-2003, 10:48 AM
no, nature is a high quality test so its 20Marks per FPS
Hobocrow
11-11-2003, 10:51 AM
Originally posted by macci
high quality tests, 1FPS = 20Marks
Low quality tests, 1FPS = 10Marks
Thanks, Macci....That's good to know! :) What's the highest unbugged FPS=??Marks for Nature?
Hobocrow
11-11-2003, 10:52 AM
I see that the question just got answered....Da*m slow dialup :D
Marquzz
11-11-2003, 01:40 PM
Originally posted by macci
no, nature is a high quality test so its 20Marks per FPS
Ok, so Bowman got it wrong? tnx Macci
bowman1964
11-11-2003, 01:58 PM
well i did a test to come up with the result.i had to round it UP.
it is easy to test.
i ran all the tests at default speed but nature.
it will give me a score without nature being run
then a ran nature.
took the differance and devided by the fps of nature.and on my run it was like 20.8 or something.so i rounded it off to 21
i am not sure how it was designed to work out.but anyone can test it this way..it isnt hard to figure out.
Marquzz
11-11-2003, 02:00 PM
Hi Bowman! I used Macci's numbers to calculate my score and got a perfect match. :)
bowman1964
11-11-2003, 02:19 PM
Originally posted by Marquzz
Hi Bowman! I used Macci's numbers to calculate my score and got a perfect match. :)
There you go..now you know.:D
Geforce4ti4200
11-11-2003, 02:33 PM
no matter, I reported his score. it should soon be gone. 600fps in nature wont happen for a very long time and I mean legit
Hobocrow
11-11-2003, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by macci
no, nature is a high quality test so its 20Marks per FPS
I started by going back and checking all my "old scores...over a year of scores in the dB...It was too time consuming to test them all : ie, high=20, low=10~ = the correct score = no bugs!
So I just deleted them all....every score that I had every posted into the FM DB is "Historia" ..as Rushie, would say!
So, I'm starting fresh...checking every score before I post....knowing that ya'll are doing the same! There finally, a perfect world!.... I'll sleep better now! :)
Ragnarok
11-11-2003, 11:43 PM
lol who has acutually read the 3dmark2001se readme? it's acutally pretty interesting read on the testing methodology and what exactly each test is supposed to represent..
and it tells u how the score is calculated...
ALT-F13
11-12-2003, 05:15 AM
Hobocrow
Well, IMO you could predict a score while see how test runs and knowing the possibilities of ur rig... So if the score is bugged - you just see it at the end:)
jagare
11-12-2003, 05:36 AM
Originally posted by Geforce4ti4200
no matter, I reported his score. it should soon be gone. 600fps in nature wont happen for a very long time and I mean legit
Some day it'll happen.. not in the near future though. :P