View Full Version : phenom X4 945ES 1st ten minutes
cdawall
01-23-2009, 03:41 PM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090123/Capture023.jpg
its on water BIX240+MCR320+Aquaxtreme MC-05 PRO+Laing D5
i will post benchmarks after work
***update***
stepping on chip: FACOC AC 0825FPM
SPi 1M@4ghz
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025.jpg
SPi 1M@4.04ghz
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture027341.jpg
SPi 32m
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025265.jpg
Generic CPU bench
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025334.jpg
wprime 32m@3.8ghz
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture027.jpg
wprime 32m@3.9ghz
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture026.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/491891.png
Glow9
01-23-2009, 03:49 PM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090123/Capture023.jpg
its on water BIX240+MCR320+Aquaxtreme MC-05 PRO+Laing D5
i will post benchmarks after work
ES?
Oliver
01-23-2009, 03:56 PM
thx for posting
if it holds up sub 1.4v and play 4g bench ... seems quite okay huh? , would be interesting to see this under cold.
AndreYang
01-23-2009, 03:56 PM
wow~AM3
what is NDA? lol
cdawall
01-23-2009, 03:56 PM
ES?
yessir its a phenom 945BE ES chip i have pics of it at home just ended up at work 30min after it came in the mail
and this is only on a Crosshair II formula unluckily i didnt get an AM3 mobo with it
you make me wanna have one soooo badly :D
cdawall
01-23-2009, 04:23 PM
thx for posting
if it holds up sub 1.4v and play 4g bench ... seems quite okay huh? , would be interesting to see this under cold.
i am at 1.6v right now i just set the volts high to make sure stability like the title said i have had it a whole 10min then went to work
i will also post pics of the cooling when i get home but its just under my standard water cooled loop
Caveman787
01-23-2009, 04:45 PM
Was it actually at 1.375 volts?
or is it reading it wrong?
Oliver
01-23-2009, 04:47 PM
thanks for information sir
keep pushing it
cdawall
01-23-2009, 05:10 PM
Was it actually at 1.375 volts?
or is it reading it wrong?
already answered that one ;)
i am at 1.6v right now i just set the volts high to make sure stability like the title said i have had it a whole 10min then went to work
i will also post pics of the cooling when i get home but its just under my standard water cooled loop
Glow9
01-23-2009, 06:35 PM
yessir its a phenom 945BE ES chip i have pics of it at home just ended up at work 30min after it came in the mail
and this is only on a Crosshair II formula unluckily i didnt get an AM3 mobo with it
Well I guess it answers if AM3s will work on AM2 mobos for sure. I'm surprised they arent sending out official chips yet. So how is this chip different than a 940?
crazydiamond
01-23-2009, 07:03 PM
ddr2 & ddr3 mem controller - less pins
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 07:44 PM
can you say the stepping? i am curious.
cdawall
01-23-2009, 07:50 PM
can you say the stepping? i am curious.
FACOC
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 07:54 PM
FACOC
hmmmmm thanks. you know how old the actual chip is?
cdawall
01-23-2009, 07:59 PM
hmmmmm thanks. you know how old the actual chip is?
how about i post a pic of the chip for you?
chew*
01-23-2009, 08:07 PM
CO stepping i'd guess is at least as old as week 43.
cdawall
01-23-2009, 08:14 PM
CO stepping i'd guess is at least as old as week 43.
its 0825
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 08:28 PM
its 0825
yea its a pretty old chip. it does have 938 pins right? i see it is listed as am2+. im wondering if cpuz will read am3 cpus as am2+ ones when they are in am2+ boards. the memory controller revision is what im also curious about. i see you have a CO when i believe CV is the most current one out there. interesting to see that you can get 4ghz on 1.375V. im assuming that 1.35V is stock for that chip. thanks for the results i hope to see more soon. but the 945 is so far away. :(
Smalltimer
01-23-2009, 08:33 PM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090123/Capture023.jpg
its on water BIX240+MCR320+Aquaxtreme MC-05 PRO+Laing D5
i will post benchmarks after work
Thanks very much for this.
I can't wait to see the performance differences between this and the AM2 versions.
Also... does this mean the chips will all be this good in the OC dept?
If so, I can see AMD closing the gap yet a little more on the i7's but then again... will the DD3 cost differences pee on AMD's price advantages?
Anyways, I look forward to seeing more volts and(hopfully) higher clocks too :)
cdawall
01-23-2009, 08:35 PM
yea its a pretty old chip. it does have 938 pins right? i see it is listed as am2+. im wondering if cpuz will read am3 cpus as am2+ ones when they are in am2+ boards. the memory controller revision is what im also curious about. i see you have a CO when i believe CV is the most current one out there. interesting to see that you can get 4ghz on 1.375V. im assuming that 1.35V is stock for that chip. thanks for the results i hope to see more soon. but the 945 is so far away. :(
yes and this was at pretty high volts cpuz doesn't read them correctly
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 08:36 PM
will the DD3 cost differences pee on AMD's price advantages?
ddr3 should become cheaper soon and with am3 working both ways it should be fine. it really depends on the platform. if they can create good cheap motherboards that give a good performance bonus from ddr3 then it should be nice. if not then i don't see ddr3 being anything special but just moving along in technology and getting off the obsolete ram.
Macadamia
01-23-2009, 09:09 PM
Wait, NB @ 1.8?
So it reverts to 1.8 in a AM2 socket? Ouch.
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 09:12 PM
Wait, NB @ 1.8?
So it reverts to 1.8 in a AM2 socket? Ouch.
maybe, its an old chip so it doesn't say too much. cpuz sees it as a am2+ chip. maybe when bios comes that fully supports am3 chips it could put the nb at 2ghz. just the chip is over half a year old with no bios support.
BeepBeep2
01-23-2009, 09:13 PM
yea its a pretty old chip. it does have 938 pins right? i see it is listed as am2+. im wondering if cpuz will read am3 cpus as am2+ ones when they are in am2+ boards. the memory controller revision is what im also curious about. i see you have a CO when i believe CV is the most current one out there. interesting to see that you can get 4ghz on 1.375V. im assuming that 1.35V is stock for that chip. thanks for the results i hope to see more soon. but the 945 is so far away. :(
It's at 1.6v :D
cdawall
01-23-2009, 09:50 PM
maybe, its an old chip so it doesn't say too much. cpuz sees it as a am2+ chip. maybe when bios comes that fully supports am3 chips it could put the nb at 2ghz. just the chip is over half a year old with no bios support.
its not cranked all the way up its only been in my hands a few minutes lol
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=491516
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/491516.png
cdawall
01-23-2009, 10:09 PM
here is a little more on the HT link
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture024.jpg
cdawall
01-23-2009, 10:12 PM
SPi 1M
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025.jpg
Generic CPU bench
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025334.jpg
wprime 32m
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture027.jpg
roofsniper
01-23-2009, 11:06 PM
did the chip come at a default of 2ghz HT speed? not that it matters since its an ES and will have different settings anyway. also i would be interested in how high u can get that HT link stable.
cdawall
01-23-2009, 11:11 PM
did the chip come at a default of 2ghz HT speed? not that it matters since its an ES and will have different settings anyway. also i would be interested in how high u can get that HT link stable.
i set the HT link to 2.6ghz but it stayed locked @2ghz....
Stuen4y
01-23-2009, 11:12 PM
I want to see what can make the chip at 1.6V. :rolleyes:
Daveburt714
01-23-2009, 11:43 PM
Very Nice cdawall! I'm jealous man... :D
Your running this on a DDR2 board right? AMD is definetly on the right track, those scores will only get better when we get decent boards with DDR3, and it looks like Mobo manufactures are starting to take notice....
Gratz on the new chip man... :up:
G-UNIT91
01-24-2009, 03:18 AM
cdawall
Can you compare 940BE???:D
I'm sure that he is going to get the same results with this 945 than with the 940, the gap will be seen when ddr3 mobo and ram come.
biohead
01-24-2009, 05:00 AM
0825? :O that chip's a granny. whatever results most likely won't reflect how retail chips are going to perform.
Lightman
01-24-2009, 06:18 AM
0825? :O that chip's a granny. whatever results most likely won't reflect how retail chips are going to perform.
Yes, it still is RB-C1, only with enabled DDR3 support.
If rumor was true, then this chip paired with DDR3 might have very small advantage over DDR2 and/or some stability problems.
On the other hand we have proof that Deneb has DDR3 IMC, only AMD for some reason disabled it for AM2+ RB-C2 revision.
I'm still waiting for first leaked picture of RB-C3 stepping (AndreYang do you hear me :p:)
cdawall
01-24-2009, 07:06 AM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture024690.jpg
its getting better :D
cdawall
01-24-2009, 07:07 AM
now the crazy thing look at the coretemp dump
---------------------------------------------------
Core Temp version 0.99.4.65 - 32bit
---------------------------------------------------
Number of processors: 1
Number of cores: 4
Number of threads: 4
Processor information:
---------------------------------------------------
Processor 0
Package 0
Cores: 4 (Max 4)
Threads: 4 (Max 4)
Processor name: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 13 BE (Deneb) (Engineering Sample)
Processor name string: AMD Engineering Sample
Platform: Socket AM2+ (940 pin)
Processor signature: 0x100F41
Processor revision: RB-C1
Process node: 45 nm
Model: 0
Package type: 0x1
String 1: 0x0
String 2: 0x0
Page: 0x0
Processor speed: 3616.45MHz (200.91 x 18.0)
Bus speed: 2009.14MHz
Bus ratio: x10
Maximum voltage: 1.5500V
Instruction set: MMX+, 3DNow+, 3DNow Prefetch, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64
Feature set: VT, XD, CnQ
L1 data cache: 4 x 64 KiB, 2-way set associative, 64-byte line size - 1 thread(s)
L1 instruction cache: 4 x 64 KiB, 2-way set associative, 64-byte line size - 1 thread(s)
L2 cache: 4 x 512 KiB, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size - 1 thread(s)
L3 cache: 6144 KiB, 48-way set associative, 64-byte line size - 4 thread(s)
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture025265.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture026.jpg
charged3800z24
01-24-2009, 10:04 AM
Wait, NB @ 1.8?
So it reverts to 1.8 in a AM2 socket? Ouch.
If it is like the 940, When I go above 2.6ghz NB, the chip auto sets HT to 1600. So, if 2000HT stock, and you go above 2600nb HT goes to 1800..or am I slow today?
cdawall
01-24-2009, 10:29 AM
new max oc's
4.22ghz 18.5*228mhz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/491891.png
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=491891
max multi
4.2ghz 21*200mhz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/491916.png
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=491916
Oliverda
01-24-2009, 10:39 AM
new max oc's
4.22ghz 18.5*228mhz
max multi
4.2ghz 21*200mhz
Voltages?
cdawall
01-24-2009, 10:41 AM
Voltages?
1.65v for everything so far pushing high just well to get it to work lol finesse is for people with alot of time on there hands
cdawall
01-24-2009, 11:00 AM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090124/Capture027341.jpg
Glow9
01-24-2009, 11:06 AM
So essentially this thing is no different in terms of OCing than a 940 except has a cpl 200 extra mhz and can run ddr3? I just want to make sure here
cdawall
01-24-2009, 11:11 AM
So essentially this thing is no different in terms of OCing than a 940 except has a cpl 200 extra mhz and can run ddr3? I just want to make sure here
pretty much the only real difference between the two chips is DDR3
possessed
01-24-2009, 11:25 AM
If it is like the 940, When I go above 2.6ghz NB, the chip auto sets HT to 1600. So, if 2000HT stock, and you go above 2600nb HT goes to 1800..or am I slow today?
2600MHz is the motherboard's limit, that's why it resets.
from dfi:
HyperTransport 3.0 (5200MT/s [2600MHz] for AM2+) HyperTransport 1.0 (2000/1600MT/s [1000/800MHz] for AM2)
from asus same story:
Up to 5200 MT/s; HyperTransport™ 3.0 interface for AM2+ CPU
2000 / 1600 MT/s for AM2 CPU
charged3800z24
01-24-2009, 12:34 PM
2600MHz is the motherboard's limit, that's why it resets.
from dfi:
HyperTransport 3.0 (5200MT/s [2600MHz] for AM2+) HyperTransport 1.0 (2000/1600MT/s [1000/800MHz] for AM2)
from asus same story:
Up to 5200 MT/s; HyperTransport™ 3.0 interface for AM2+ CPU
2000 / 1600 MT/s for AM2 CPU
I know, But I am refering to why the HT link drops from 1800 to 1600 when my NB is above 2600. I can set my NB to 2800mhz in the bios, and leave the HT auto, which is 1800, but once into windows, HT is now at 1600 and NB is still at 2800...See what I mean?..I just found it odd.
gOtVoltage
01-24-2009, 01:26 PM
I know, But I am refering to why the HT link drops from 1800 to 1600 when my NB is above 2600. I can set my NB to 2800mhz in the bios, and leave the HT auto, which is 1800, but once into windows, HT is now at 1600 and NB is still at 2800...See what I mean?..I just found it odd.
First,, Nice ES and clocks ..
Second,, As for HT and Auto HT setting.
Look @ HT as the optimal freqency the mobo likes to run @ 2800nb.. A long time ago with phenom ive found that optimal Freqency on the HT can be a lot lower than what one would think you should run.
The HT is the main factor for stability on most mobos for the Chip to Run high Freqencies. Sometimes it takes less HT to make this optimal and sometimes Mobos like More HT to run optimal. In essence it is the Speed of NB and CPU which gives the performance while the HT gives the stability
.
I dont know an easier way to say that. It looks like that the HT lowers to the next best (100% stable freqency) when set on auto , that would be a good thing.
On a mobo thats rated for 3000HT you should see this when set HT to Auto. Now for mobo that can run more (5200ht), id say it will drop down once you get up to 5200+ . Once you reach its max HT point on Auto it should want to drop back down.
Agian it looks as if the Mobo is setting optimal HT vs highest HT..again this is what you would want. The mobo should always be running at its best HT freqency or (Optimal )to keep everything stable " Not its Highest HT freqency".
Lastly ,,
HT or Bios setting on Auto if it senses instability ,even when you are only running a chip @ 1800x2 =3600ht . Ive found it wiill/can lower the HT to a freqency that makes things more stable or Raise it to match what the CPU wants.Even if 1800ht is the default for a given chip.
Ive always used a Manual HT setting (never Auto). I simply dont use AUTO because it may choose to the lower the HT instead of raising it Higher which also could be stable . Ive found that in Most cases Slightly higher or Lower HT freqencies could both work Manually. But on Auto it would default to the best lower freqency to keep things stable.
In all if the NB is @ 2600mhz and it likes lower HT freqency(ON AUTO) thats not a bad thing. By all means i would try to set it (Manualy) while using different dividers and or HTT . Youll find that you should be able to get your HT back up 1800+.
Well thats my 2cents worth:D
Note: if you want 1800+ HT ..
Play with the HTT and use a lower HT divider untill your At the HT speed you want . Above 2600 it will default to 1800(most 5200ht mobos). So use HTT and HT dividers to keep the HT below its max it wont default. I can run 2600ht easy @ 2600nb,, i must use a HT of 10x 260= 2600 . In your case if NB is at 2800 and if the HTT is set high say 260 the Auto HT would see this maybe not set the correct limit .Instead of exceeding the limit it yould try to default to 1800ht.
EXAMPLE:
10xht 260htt = 2600x2 or 5200ht.. this is on the edge,,I use manual to get it, Auto will default the HT
9xht 260htt = 2340x2 or 4680ht .. this would keep under the Max HT,, Auto may work or may default.
Anyways i always use a Manual HT setting.
Lightman
01-24-2009, 02:22 PM
Impressive clocking cdwall :up:
When are you expecting to get AM3 mobo?
cdawall
01-24-2009, 04:51 PM
Impressive clocking cdwall :up:
When are you expecting to get AM3 mobo?
when i can find one my sources are sucking lately
cdawall
01-29-2009, 05:58 PM
here's a 3d bench
http://img.techpowerup.org/090129/Capture028.jpg
bacon612
02-19-2009, 11:05 AM
CDAwall, do you have Am3 mobo and DDR3 yet? They are out and shipping. I would love to see how you 945 performs on it. I am going to skip AM2+ and DDR2 but wont buy until AM3 PIIs x4s are out with 8 megs of cache an no multi lock. The 720 BE is tempting but i want to jump right to quad core.
cdawall
02-19-2009, 01:08 PM
i will have one in the mail as soon as my 720BE RMA"s
bacon612
02-19-2009, 01:53 PM
Do you expect you 945 to OC any better on the AM3 platform than the 940 does?
ILikeCosmosS
02-19-2009, 02:11 PM
it might oc better once the new chipsets come i beleive the rd890 and the sb 800 which should be in by june
also amd is going to relase there FX proccessor hopfully it will be successful
cdawall
02-19-2009, 02:53 PM
well i managed 4.22ghz on my 780a board enough for verification i'm going to get a M4A78t-e which is not quite as high end of a mobo but it is a 790GX with SB750 so it should oc very well anyway
Throwed
02-19-2009, 05:03 PM
@cdawall.........See people like you are why people get killed. If I knew where you lived, I'd take a leg of lamb to your cranium and have that 945 in my M3A78.:lol:
Raiderman
02-19-2009, 05:06 PM
it might oc better once the new chipsets come i beleive the rd890 and the sb 800 which should be in by june
also amd is going to relase there FX proccessor hopfully it will be successful
They are releasing an FX cpu?? Give me some links please!
cdawall
02-19-2009, 05:27 PM
@cdawall.........See people like you are why people get killed. If I knew where you lived, I'd take a leg of lamb to your cranium and have that 945 in my M3A78.:lol:
i just sold like 5 of them and am getting another if you want one PM me
Throwed
02-19-2009, 05:54 PM
You have been PM'ed!
cdawall
02-19-2009, 06:04 PM
PM's have all been answered :D
cdawall
02-24-2009, 02:46 PM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090224/Capture002960.jpg
got another one in lol this is @1.45v stable as a rock
cdawall
02-24-2009, 02:57 PM
4ghz stable @1.5625v
http://img.techpowerup.org/090224/Capture003186.jpg
4.22ghz suicide
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/515356.png (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=515356)
http://img.techpowerup.org/090224/Capture052.jpg
G0ldBr1ck
02-24-2009, 04:22 PM
gotta love those black edition Opteron's :p:
Thats the exact same Sucide OC I get with the one you sent me.
cdawall
02-24-2009, 04:23 PM
they dont seem to want to go any higher than that...its probably the batch all of the ones i sent out are FACOC 0825's
and you need to leave me some heat
G0ldBr1ck
02-24-2009, 04:27 PM
are you still getting a C2 or did it turn out to be that C1.
cdawall
02-24-2009, 04:47 PM
nope sitll getting a C2
cdawall
03-06-2009, 01:45 PM
http://img.techpowerup.org/090306/Capture066.jpg
http://img.techpowerup.org/090306/Capture067.jpg
cdawall
03-07-2009, 09:48 PM
1st DICE run yields 4.7ghz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/522655.png (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=522655)
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/522655.png
msimax
03-07-2009, 11:02 PM
:clap:
Chicken Patty
03-07-2009, 11:23 PM
congrats cdawall :up:
cdawall
03-08-2009, 09:25 AM
:clap:
congrats cdawall :up:
thanks i'm going to try for some super pi runs and will see how different a good DDR3 and DDR2 kit are