Phenom 9950 at nearly 4.5GHz

[massman]

Just spotted this overclock:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/450255.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=450255

4 cores, LN2, 1.86v.

[pxhx]

wow.. i'm wating to Phenom II!!!

[FatAlbert]

holy crap :eek:

the best cpu on the world ?

cherrypicked from amd ?

[redratamd]

Very good chip OMG . Some benchs runned ?

[George_o/c]

:eek2: Owner of the cpu, if you are listening to me, run some benchmarks ! :p: :D

[knopflerbruce]

Quite a lot of speed between #1 and #2 - 375MHz. We all know that CPUZ has some frequency "glitches" (or what you call it) from time to time, and with such a superior chip I'd say a benchmark run at reasonable speed would be nice to have - just to verify that it's indeed correct. If I ever got a 4.6Ghz FX57 you bet I'd run at least 1m on it, not just do suicides:p:

[pump101]

I want one!

[informal]

This is the last batch of B3s,almost a B4 practically.I guess the chip wasn't quite stable for user to run tests,but if knocked off 100-200Mhz he would probably be able to run benchmark tests on it too.

[George_o/c]

This is the last batch of B3s,almost a B4 practically.I guess the chip wasn't quite stable for user to run tests,but if knocked off 100-200Mhz he would probably be able to run benchmark tests on it too.

Of course it's impossible to run tests at that speed, but at about ~60 - 80MHz lower, he'll for sure be able to run an SPi 1M run, just to clear things up and automatically crush a WR :D ('cause at ~4400MHz, one could crush AMD 1M WR while browsing xtremesystems.org :yepp:)

[informal]

Of course it's impossible to run tests at that speed, but at about ~60 - 80MHz lower, he'll for sure be able to run an SPi 1M run, just to clear things up and automatically crush a WR :D ('cause at ~4400MHz, one could crush AMD 1M WR while browsing xtremesystems.org :yepp:)

Yep quite true.But don't forget that all that effort will last only about a month or so,since ~3.6Ghz Deneb would destroy that record while browsing xtremesystems.org :D

[George_o/c]

Actually it's 6 weeks :p:, so I personally think it's kind of cool to have the AMD 1M WR for over a month ;) :D

[TheKarmakazi]

very nice OC! cant wait for Q1-09 to see some really extreme AMD's

[ZoLKoRn]

Yaaahoooo nice to see AMD come back to the way :D well hope after Q1-09 we can see more extreme oc from AMD !!! :up:

[tiborrr]

Major props to whoever achieved this. Really impressive run, this is how Phenoms should clock right at launch.

[natedog420]

this is great i hope they go higher but that is still good. was thinking of getting the new amd:rolleyes: but not sure. :D

[Ozzfest05]

some one who clocks that hardcore would obviously post on hwbot considereing highest validation on hwbot is 3.9 I think this is a cpuz glitch

[knopflerbruce]

some one who clocks that hardcore would obviously post on hwbot considereing highest validation on hwbot is 3.9 I think this is a cpuz glitch

I think the same;) I can't remember having seen any WR's that have been THAT superior. Ever. Without any benchmarks it's hard to believe it...

[hey]

coldbug @ ???

[eligray]

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

[knopflerbruce]

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

This is not the case with AMD or Intel.

[cdawall]

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

thats not true i had an E7200es and it clocked no better than any other E7200s

not to mention the 9950 isn't even a ES they are black edition chips which means they are all unlocked multi's

[STEvil]

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

Only true during the first release of the CPU's and only part of the time even then.

[zif33rs]

Amazing OC...congrats to who ever got the golden chip..please post some benches! Think the record over at hwbot is in 4000-4100mhz range. So this crushing anything ive seen.


well done.


zif

[HDCHOPPER]

personnaly me hopes this comming year is a steller one for AMD !

[massman]

I think the same;) I can't remember having seen any WR's that have been THAT superior. Ever. Without any benchmarks it's hard to believe it...

Yeap, I'm not really buying it myself ... let's hope someone will clear this up :)

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

It's not a Deneb, it's an Agena

[headman800]

i think this CPU is "golden sample"

[George_o/c]

It will be a golden sample, if we see some SPi runs ... ;) Till then, it's more like a BS sample ;)

[SiuL]

very nice cpu from AMD

[Kasparz]

It will be a golden sample, if we see some SPi runs ... ;) Till then, it's more like a BS sample ;)
If more people would start overclocking AMD now, sure we would see more records. 95% of overclockers here are using Intel, so most AMD chips with great overclocking potential will never see any overclocking at all.

[biohead]

If more people would start overclocking AMD now, sure we would see more records. 95% of overclockers here are using Intel, so most AMD chips with great overclocking potential will never see any overclocking at all.

this

[SoF]

considering I had an ES Phenom I which clocked remarkable better than most retails I somehow doubt the score...not to mention that no matter what I tried I could never validate the phenom with 4GHZ+ on CPUz even it was fine in windows idling. All my validations where corrupted and I tried it more than 20 times :( So this does look like some bug (maybe).

[Ghostbuster]

considering I had an ES Phenom I which clocked remarkable better than most retails I somehow doubt the score...not to mention that no matter what I tried I could never validate the phenom with 4GHZ+ on CPUz even it was fine in windows idling. All my validations where corrupted and I tried it more than 20 times :( So this does look like some bug (maybe).When you were overclocking, was the RAM on single channel?:rolleyes:

[SoF]

didn't made a big difference while I was testing back in the days so I used DC. But still 500MHZ+ seems like an impossible gain with SC. and just to make it clear: i don't want to call it a wrong result without further information but it should be allowed to question some things ;)

[mongoled]

didn't made a big difference while I was testing back in the days so I used DC. But still 500MHZ+ seems like an impossible gain with SC. and just to make it clear: i don't want to call it a wrong result without further information but it should be allowed to question some things ;)Couldnt agree more, that results looks way to high to be true, its almost 400mhz higher than most known valid 9950 clocks

[George_o/c]

Any news on that chip ?

[knopflerbruce]

didn't made a big difference while I was testing back in the days so I used DC. But still 500MHZ+ seems like an impossible gain with SC. and just to make it clear: i don't want to call it a wrong result without further information but it should be allowed to question some things ;)

Any news on that chip ?

If there is no benchmarks, and no news of any kind I'd say it's a bugged validation:D

This is like getting a 7.2ghz E8600... I bet people would wonder if a validation was all you'd get:p:

[MaSell]

AMD CPU-Z record from China and no any other benches = 95% fake for me. Those guys months ago did exacly the same with 6400+, cheating.

[Oj101]

Athlon X2 6400+ @ 4299MHz - AMD FREQUENCY WORLD RECORD

No prizes for guessing why you posted :p:

[FatAlbert]

I've got question, can I see some pictures from this party or screens with lower mhz ?

I mean, even in times when intel is much better than amd, if you do high mhz or good pi on amd probably you'll show it. I have seen nothing which can be link together with it. Show it, prove it and than I'll believe it :D

look here, you have got all what you want and what you want to know about the fastest k8 [;

http://forum.purepc.pl/Ekstremalne-Podkrecanie-f32/Kilka-Rekordow-swiata-Kategorii-Amd-t261938.html

you don't have to understand polish language, only look at screens :D

[MaSell]

No prizes for guessing why you posted :p:

If I don't even had any amd cpu that wasn't funny for me. Ask ripping.org crew about it.

[George_o/c]

No prizes for guessing why you posted :p:

I really don't think that Masell posted because he felt intimidated as far as his WR is concerned ;)

We should just, play fair :)

[WaterFlex]

Never thought it`s possible. Well done massman.

[TiTON]

Wow.. amazing speed. Got to bring out my 9950 and try on some LN2. If I can get a suicide at 4+, that would be good to me :)

Ton

[George_o/c]

Never thought it`s possible. Well done massman.

This craaaaaaaaazy overclock is not Pieter's, he just created a thread about it ;) A chinese guy did that ...

[Oj101]

If I don't even had any amd cpu that wasn't funny for me. Ask ripping.org crew about it.

I really don't think that Masell posted because he felt intimidated as far as his WR is concerned ;)

We should just, play fair :)

Hey hey hey, note the :p: I used? It was said as a joke:yepp:

[A9tm]

I can't believe it =.=

[Donbe]

This the world recorder sets record in E8600.
Because the information of this person is not found, I am interested very much.

[massman]

I think we have a cheater among us: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=454936 :mad:

[boblemagnifique]

This the world recorder sets record in E8600.
Because the information of this person is not found, I am interested very much.

Yes me too , but it's possible my ex E8600 (dead now) a make 6801mhz (i have see but not valid) maybe better with my Golden Chips Q822A435 (i wait the good Biostar Tpower i45 now :) )

[Oj101]

World Record :D

Who is that? I wouldn't call cheat yet... How did you find it? Was it posted anywhere? It might be a bug which he uploaded to see if it would validate?

[knopflerbruce]

World Record :D

Who is that? I wouldn't call cheat yet... How did you find it? Was it posted anywhere? It might be a bug which he uploaded to see if it would validate?

Yeah, I agree to that. It's not right to call people cheaters if all they did was to try to validate a bugged run - without intending to claim the WR. I like that ripping seems to "auto-add" x86-submissions to the database, but SOMETIMES it causes some trouble;)

[knopflerbruce]

I think we have a cheater among us: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=454936 :mad:

Obviously bugged;) But I don't think it's a cheat.

[Donbe]

Obviously bugged;) But I don't think it's a cheat.

I agree, too. If it is a bug, I can forgive a Black Joke. :lol2:
However, it is a problem if it is malicious fraud.

In any case only a registrant understands the truth....

[knopflerbruce]

I agree, too. If it is a bug, I can forgive a Black Joke. :lol2:
However, it is a problem if it is malicious fraud.

In any case only a registrant understands the truth....

It's quite easy to fix this... just remove the score (and perhaps the 4,5GHz Phenom as well... benchmarks anywhere)

[Kunaak]

in all my time spent spotting fakes, and such over the years.
the one obvious thing is always this...

WR's tend to be in small steps. not huge leaps.

WR one week 8100 mhz (631 P4 example) next week, 8120 mhz.... and so on.

WR's in huge leaps, from unknown names, with little more then a single screen shot, or single validation... throw it out.
if its real, let them prove it. if they cant... too bad.

plain fact is - EVERY serious overclocker here, would do more then 1 screenshot for a WR.
even if it meant lowing the max OC by 300 mhz for a few small benchs.
anything to back up the OC.

[knopflerbruce]

in all my time spent spotting fakes, and such over the years.
the one obvious thing is always this...

WR's tend to be in small steps. not huge leaps.

WR one week 8100 mhz (631 P4 example) next week, 8120 mhz.... and so on.

WR's in huge leaps, from unknown names, with little more then a single screen shot, or single validation... throw it out.
if its real, let them prove it. if they cant... too bad.

plain fact is - EVERY serious overclocker here, would do more then 1 screenshot for a WR.
even if it meant lowing the max OC by 300 mhz for a few small benchs.
anything to back up the OC.

... exactly;)

[G H Z]

The two validations posted by massman are not from the same user, at least name wise they're not. How did you know the voltage on the first massman, forum post somewhere?

[kemo]

Rejected by CPU-Z 1.48
Does this mean anything or i am missing something

[massman]

The two validations posted by massman are not from the same user, at least name wise they're not. How did you know the voltage on the first massman, forum post somewhere?

I found this score on ripping.org where it was added manually, I guess. The voltage was given there.

Does this mean anything or i am missing something

I talked to Franck today and he switched the score (Phenom) to unsure because of the reasons already given in this thread. The score really looks suspicious: a sudden increase and no threads, no pictures, no backups.

[felix_w]

Well, what about this one ?

http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh200/felix_w/Sempron30006G.jpg

My jaws dropped down to the floor when i saw that....

[Oj101]

I can vouch for that one. It was done on the stock AMD cooler and is 100% real





:rofl:

[kemo]

I can vouch for that one. It was done on the stock AMD cooler and is 100% real





:rofl:
May be stock Vcore too , you know CPUz sometimes report wrong voltages :D

[felix_w]

Well it happened in the beginning of the year as you can see, while playing a little with a spare pc at home....

....i think i was around HT = 278 or just over it, and after trying some settings, it freezed 3 or 4 times and then it booted like what i posted above...:shocked:

....obviously its some kind of bug/malfunction...after a reboot everything came back to normal...:p:

[Oj101]

Well it happened in the beginning of the year as you can see, while playing a little with a spare pc at home....

....i think i was around HT = 278 or just over it, and after trying some settings, it freezed 3 or 4 times and then it booted like what i posted above...:shocked:

....obviously its some kind of bug/malfunction...after a reboot everything came back to normal...:p:

I almost replied before reading further :D

[MaSell]

Back to '06 ;)

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7884/56ghzsz6.jpg

and '05

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/1318/249ghzcpuzfakeho6.jpg

Random bugs hehe

[knopflerbruce]

Back to '06 ;)

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7884/56ghzsz6.jpg

and '05

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/1318/249ghzcpuzfakeho6.jpg

Random bugs hehe

What do we need Nehalem for anyways:D

[Oj101]

Didn't that Sempron slip though ORB and grab a world record? I seem to recall something like that.

[felix_w]

Oj101 if you're referring to my "odd" sempron, i didn't even validate the result through cpu-z , since that would be unfair (although i don't think there would be a single case that they would consider it as valid)...

The specific result is only posted & marked as odd and not valid result in the "AMD OC result thread" in the AMD subforum of Thelab.gr, where i also state that it is obviously caused by a bug...

[Oj101]

No, someone had their 30GHz or whatever Sempron ORB validated with a world record score.

[felix_w]

Does this WR exist till now ? If it is, unfair...