View Full Version : athlon64 overclock record. all owners please post
misteroadster
03-10-2004, 09:26 AM
yes + 4% 3dmark2001 it's fabulous.
neo.life
03-10-2004, 10:38 AM
Yes 900pts more
exelent !!!
When Nforce 3 250 are out?
andyddr
03-10-2004, 10:42 AM
I`ve e-mailed DFI to do a review on the 250 and they said early April . Epox might be end of this month though. The rest will follow soon after.
neo.life
03-10-2004, 11:39 AM
anybody find core cg core?
A64'uSER
03-10-2004, 02:10 PM
Wee, i just got my new Power supply, Antec Trueblue 480w, and now i could make a stable clock of my cpu. 10x230 - 1.65vcore. Is'nt that okay? I have'nt tried higher, but i'm sure that it can go 2400MHZ :P
cpulloverclock
03-10-2004, 05:14 PM
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/k8v.htm
air cooling
Athlon64 3400+iADA3400AEP5AP:( CAAOC 0401SPMW
vcore 1.55v
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/11x224-3355-xp.gif http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/11x224-104-xp.gif:
SupaMan
03-10-2004, 06:29 PM
Plugged it all in today. Much to my dismay gigabyte F'ed up the mounting bracket by using clips instead of screws... yay.
K8N Pro, havent done any testing or anything, just "hay, it works"
http://www.ocfaq.com/files/0310_supa642200.gif
Any one have a link to a thread with K8N pro tweaking info? looking for info on exactly what all of the voltages are, as well as how the hell to gain access to more advanced functions such as memory timings
edit: Note the CG.. anyone else got one of these? seeing pretty much all C0s in the thread
misteroadster
03-10-2004, 07:08 PM
waouhhhhhhh a CG core !!!!! :banana:
you are very lucky !!!!!
what is the stepp ?????????
:toast:
it s the first i seen , i hope i could have one soon in france to chill it. :toast:
SupaMan
03-10-2004, 07:10 PM
stepping is CAAPC date 0401
Got it shipped to me right from AMD... <3 review samples
SupaMan
03-10-2004, 07:11 PM
Anyway... more random settings.. hehe
http://www.ocfaq.com/files/0310_supa642300.jpg
went to DDR votlage +.3 and HT +.1 and vDDQ +.1 core 1.7... probably could get away with less than that.
going to go play something :D
Karnivore
03-10-2004, 07:13 PM
Control/F1 gets you to advanced menu in the K8NPRO....
SupaMan
03-10-2004, 07:14 PM
Originally posted by Karnivore
Control/F1 gets you to advanced menu in the K8NPRO....
Thanks, you've saved me from minutes of painful manual reading :D
misteroadster
03-10-2004, 07:14 PM
ok , pleased to meet you. ;)
have a good overclock :)
i hope the CG core had more potential.
show us how it perform.
I have to sleep i'm dead.
But i'm excited to get up tomorrow
misteroadster
03-10-2004, 07:15 PM
don't touch the vcore ;) just fsb and hit the max stable at default voltage.
to hit max fsb put the LDT to 2,5X max about 290
LDT 2X max 330
neo.life
03-11-2004, 12:16 AM
Originally posted by misteroadster
don't touch the vcore ;) just fsb and hit the max stable at default voltage.
to hit max fsb put the LDT to 2,5X max about 290
LDT 2X max 330
+1:slobber:
kakaroto
03-11-2004, 12:19 AM
YOUR VCORE IS WAY TO HIGH.
Try to reach max stable with Standard Vcore dude.
Set LDT@2.5x and play :)
damnz, I have a CAATC 0404, newer week than yours but one core revision older :p:
neo.life
03-11-2004, 12:24 AM
+1 too kakaroto
neo.life
03-11-2004, 12:25 AM
where do you buy your cg core?
SupaMan
03-11-2004, 04:04 AM
Originally posted by neo.life
where do you buy your cg core?
I didn't, I run a tech site and review hardware. AMD sent it to me. :D
vcore is back down to stock now, trying out 210x10. Passed prime for 4 hours then crapped out... only other thing I changed was memory voltage +.1, might need more. Before I go further I want to work with the memory timing more. The comp refuses to load windows with any of the manual settings i've tried so far ( 6-2-2-2 7-3-3-2 11-2-2-2 ). When I was trying to get 7-3-3-2 working I thought it might be the tREF so I had it on 2x3120, 1x3120 1x1554 4x2??? 128... Once I get that locked down I'll toy with speeds more. Time to go look up the vmem mod and such.... my 1GB BH5 is hungry :)
edit: kakaroto, something else you might want to know is that my CPU is brown, not a green like yours.
edit2: have a look http://www.ocfaq.com/files/0304_IMG_0770.jpg
misteroadster
03-11-2004, 04:31 AM
put the LDT to 2,5X
Desynch the ram AUTO to 150 or 166 , at default timings.
stock vcore.
and pump up the FSB with clockgen , i think 240 fsb is possible with a cg core at stock voltage , and try with LDT 2X.
the gigabyte mobo don't boot with +230 FSB.
Try with clockgen for NF3 !!!!
www.cpuid.com
paul007
03-11-2004, 05:11 AM
cpulloverclock>
34s 1m @ 2460mhz very very nice :)
what mobo gigabyte nf3??
cpulloverclock
03-11-2004, 05:19 AM
Originally posted by paul007
cpulloverclock>
34s 1m @ 2460mhz very very nice :)
what mobo gigabyte nf3?? it's not a giga but an ASUS K8V standard
look at this page
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/k8v.htm
SupaMan
03-11-2004, 09:29 AM
Originally posted by misteroadster
put the LDT to 2,5X
Desynch the ram AUTO to 150 or 166 , at default timings.
stock vcore.
and pump up the FSB with clockgen , i think 240 fsb is possible with a cg core at stock voltage , and try with LDT 2X.
the gigabyte mobo don't boot with +230 FSB.
Try with clockgen for NF3 !!!!
www.cpuid.com
default ram timings arent acceptable... its BH5, i dont want to run 8-4-4-3
misteroadster
03-11-2004, 10:08 AM
Ok i understand , but we want to know if the CG core is better than C0 at stock voltage.
Timings are not important for this test.
you can't hit 2400 mhz at 1,5v ? :(
SupaMan
03-11-2004, 11:33 AM
Originally posted by misteroadster
Ok i understand , but we want to know if the CG core is better than C0 at stock voltage.
Timings are not important for this test.
you can't hit 2400 mhz at 1,5v ? :(
trying
kakaroto
03-11-2004, 12:17 PM
Originally posted by misteroadster
Ok i understand , but we want to know if the CG core is better than C0 at stock voltage.
Timings are not important for this test.
you can't hit 2400 mhz at 1,5v ? :(
If a 3000+ can hit 2.4GHz with 1.5v, its a lucky chip dude.
My 3000+ hits 2.3Ghz with 1.5v stable.
SupaMan
03-11-2004, 12:26 PM
It doesnt look like its going to hit 2400 with just 1.5. Actually I havent managed to get it to hit 2400 with any amount yet ;) For some reason it just craps out at that speed, even if the memory is throttled back and vcore upped.
But anyway,
LDT @ 2.5
v@1.5
memory 6:5 8-4-4-2.5
max 230x10
havent stability tested it yet
neo.life
03-11-2004, 01:05 PM
cg core is not fabulous :/
You haven't got ch5 ddr for test with this?
Originally posted by kakaroto
If a 3000+ can hit 2.4GHz with 1.5v, its a lucky chip dude.
My 3000+ hits 2.3Ghz with 1.5v stable.
We're talking the hyped up CG core here, it's supposed to be far better than the core's that are on the shelfs right now.
The mem controller is supposed to be more tolerant with the sort of RAM used.
Send it over to me, i'll test it for you. :D
misteroadster
03-11-2004, 01:52 PM
Supaman , do you use clockgen , if you don't , you can't hit high FSB.
my K8NPRO don't boot when FSB>230 in bios , by clockgen i can hit<330 FSB.
SupaMan
03-11-2004, 08:02 PM
May be PCI bus getting to high thats messing with my OC... I use an m-audio revolution. I doubt its as high PCI speed friendly as the SB or onboard cards people are using.
kakaroto
03-12-2004, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by Zeus
We're talking the hyped up CG core here, it's supposed to be far better than the core's that are on the shelfs right now.
The mem controller is supposed to be more tolerant with the sort of RAM used.
Send it over to me, i'll test it for you. :D
Yes it suppost to be better, its needs lass Vcore at low speed.
But we have to wait and see what supeman do with his CG.
I only say that 2.4GHz with stock is a very very good OC. even for a CG.
kakaroto
03-12-2004, 12:49 AM
Here another try with my 3000+ on crappie asetek.
http://kakaroto.ntonline.nl/A64_3000/Pifast_2.62GHz.PNG
neo.life
03-12-2004, 04:39 AM
good :)
misteroadster
03-12-2004, 05:07 AM
fine for your cooling ,you ve got a good chip kakaroto !
;)
eviLRuLeZ
03-12-2004, 10:19 AM
what's new supaman?
what frequency did you hit finally?
neo.life
03-12-2004, 10:44 AM
yes pleazzz
...
misteroadster
03-12-2004, 11:59 AM
.....and supaman never go back :(
SupaMan
03-12-2004, 01:14 PM
I have been playing with it, at 1.5V the max stable is 2.2GHz. Even there it isnt stable in prime, but I havent been able to crash it there yet. I am currently testing out 2.3GHz at 1.65V...
One thing I can say for certain is that without more vcore (mobo max 1.7V) the chip absolutely will not stabilize at 2.4GHz. even if the RAM is at 185MHz and the LDT at 1x.... 2.4 is a no go for sure, unless I am missing some key setting... and I believe i've toyed with them all
EmineM
03-12-2004, 02:06 PM
show us some sandra bandwidth tests see if they improved the mem controller anyhow
SupaMan
03-12-2004, 02:12 PM
eh....
2553/2551
in sandra
timings below, LDT 3x, 2.3Ghz HT 230
Originally posted by SupaMan
eh....
2553/2551
in sandra
timings below, LDT 3x, 2.3Ghz HT 230
These timings suck big time!! :eek:
Are these the best timings it takes??
Set LDT to 2,5 and try other RAM, it might not like the RAM.
If you could just show a Sandra mem bandwidth test @ 10x200 and decent timings (2-2-2-6-11-16) we could make a nice compare.
Don't know what's holding you back but it doesn't look promising at all. :(
SupaMan
03-12-2004, 02:44 PM
what would you suggest setting tREF at...
I don't know these Gigabyte mobo's, i suggest you have a look at macci's site:
http://www.akiba-pc.com/article.php?39.0
;)
SupaMan
03-12-2004, 02:55 PM
under absolutely no circumstances will windows boot with CL=2.0 so CL has to be 2.5 at least. Considering that, then I shouldnt go lower than 7 for tRAS or whatever that bigger one is called. Here is
7-2-2-2.5
LDT 3x @ 200
CPU 200x10
tREF is at its lowest value, 1x1552
misteroadster
03-12-2004, 04:34 PM
Your ram chips are bh-5 or ch-5 or another ?
Do you increase Vddr to 2,9v?
Could you tell me the cpu temp °c full-idle at 1,7v ?
Try with only one Memory.
Do you try to desynchronise your ram to 166 or 150 or 133...
do you use clockgen ???
please reply to me.
SupaMan
03-12-2004, 05:00 PM
Originally posted by misteroadster
Your ram chips are bh-5 or ch-5 or another ?
Do you increase Vddr to 2,9v?
Could you tell me the cpu temp °c full-idle at 1,7v ?
Try with only one Memory.
Do you try to desynchronise your ram to 166 or 150 or 133...
do you use clockgen ???
please reply to me.
I had all of the in-BIOS voltage maxed,
VDDR +.3 (probably 2.8.... shouldnt 2.5 be stock?)
HT voltage +.3
VDDQ +.3
as well as core 1.7
About temps, downloading a large file right now so it will be about a half hour before I can get back to you about them. Idle at 2Ghz is 26ºC though if that interests you
I have it cooled with a swiftech MCW5000, eheim 1250, heatercore, pair of 80cfm fans.
I did use clockgen. when I was trying for 2.4GHz basically what I did was:
-max the voltages
-set LDT to 2.5 (later tried 2 and 1)
- RAM ratio to 150 (4:3) (wanted to be absolutely sure it wasnt the RAM maxing out)
- booted, started up clockgen.
If I lower the CPU multiplier, then I can get the HTT speed up to 253 at 2.5LDT before I have problems, but no matter what combination I use... at 2.4GHz the computer resets almost immediately. I think it needs more vcore.
The RAM is 2x512Mb Corsair XMS3500 v1.1 which is BH5.
Tonight I am going to try it with just one stick in.
misteroadster
03-12-2004, 05:19 PM
there is some problems with BH-5 appearly , but normally the revison CG sould disable this problem.
yes the vcore should be welcome by the cpu.
but less than 2.4 ghz@1,7v in Watercooling iz not fabolous :/
i hope you're not lucky with this chip.
there's no use to increase vddq and vhtt. ;)
s e t h
03-12-2004, 11:54 PM
hey SupaMan - do you have an smd grabber and a 50killo ohm multi turn variable resistor. the vcore mod is so easy you might just fall off your chair.
i have a pictureless guide up http://www.planetmars.co.za/forums/index.php?showtopic=11357
also try using only one stick of memory. the giga board often takes offence to two sticks. especially 512mb ones
I have a problem... When i try to set the multiplier to x9 it wont boot up, so i have to clear CMOS - Why can't i change my multiplier?
Please help me...
EmineM
03-13-2004, 02:50 AM
K32A You can only change the multiplier if you have only ONE Stick of ram in your dimm slots
I do only have ONE stick! Maybe i should try another slot. Right now it's in slot 3. I will try to set it in slot 1. But thanks for the information anyway ;)
SupaMan
03-13-2004, 06:22 AM
Originally posted by EmineM
K32A You can only change the multiplier if you have only ONE Stick of ram in your dimm slots
with clockgen mine changes with two sticks... just doesnt retain the setting after reboot, goes back to 10.
edit: I have SMD grabbers, gotta pick up that variable resistor though.
kakaroto
03-13-2004, 06:24 AM
Originally posted by SupaMan
with clockgen mine changes with two sticks... just doesnt retain the setting after reboot, goes back to 10.
edit: I have SMD grabbers, gotta pick up that variable resistor though.
If I set my MP lower with clockgen, my PC locks.
But is remember the setting until I turn my PC off.
andyddr
03-13-2004, 06:52 AM
SupaMan GlockGen is designed to restore your bios defaults at the next boot. So if your bios is 200FSB and you have 3200+(10x) and you set GlockGen to 250 x 9.5 then it WILL reboot at 200 x10 (default).
My system will also change with two sticks in either of the three slots BUT the Gigabyte boards love the mem in the 3rd slot for some reason. Give it a try, I did and got over 10FSB higher just by doing that!
SupaMan
03-13-2004, 07:05 AM
Originally posted by andyddr
SupaMan GlockGen is designed to restore your bios defaults at the next boot. So if your bios is 200FSB and you have 3200+(10x) and you set GlockGen to 250 x 9.5 then it WILL reboot at 200 x10 (default).
My system will also change with two sticks in either of the three slots BUT the Gigabyte boards love the mem in the 3rd slot for some reason. Give it a try, I did and got over 10FSB higher just by doing that!
3rd slot eh? ok I'll give it a go. I tried with just one stick (in slot 1) and it didnt really help with anything at all.
I figured clockgen wasnt supposed to keep the setting... would really screw people over if they picked a bad one if it did
Matshui
03-13-2004, 09:08 AM
I was wondering how you guys can get such a high FSB, when the PCI/AGP lock don't seem to work proberly....?
Are you just lucky that it works on that time, when you are clocking, or does it have something to do with a newer BIOS..? :confused:
SupaMan
03-13-2004, 11:36 AM
Originally posted by Matshui
I was wondering how you guys can get such a high FSB, when the PCI/AGP lock don't seem to work proberly....?
Are you just lucky that it works on that time, when you are clocking, or does it have something to do with a newer BIOS..? :confused:
Mostly luck, and using PCI devices that happen to tolerate such speeds.
Matshui
03-13-2004, 02:02 PM
I have recently discovered that it sometimes work adjusting your AGP speed throug ClockGen, atleast when I tried another time earlier, the AGP speed stayed and even went down when I clocked my CPU back to the stocj settings again...
Also before my AGP speed had no trouble staying at 66/33Mhz, without adjusting it, and then suddently it won't lock anymore... :confused:
But if that thing with ClockGen works, then it is no problem anymore... :banana:
when you guys say the pci/agp lock doesnt work? what speeds does it stop working at? so far mine has stayed working but ive only got it as high as 240 so i probly havent got to the point where it stops working yet?
peace perc,
SupaMan
03-14-2004, 01:19 PM
Originally posted by Perc
when you guys say the pci/agp lock doesnt work? what speeds does it stop working at? so far mine has stayed working but ive only got it as high as 240 so i probly havent got to the point where it stops working yet?
peace perc,
they dont work at any speed :)
your software isnt accurately reporting the speeds, to really see them you need a hardware PCI device tha measures them. Look at the anandtech article about this for some good information.
eviLRuLeZ
03-14-2004, 02:50 PM
Originally posted by SupaMan
they dont work at any speed :)
your software isnt accurately reporting the speeds, to really see them you need a hardware PCI device tha measures them. Look at the anandtech article about this for some good information.
what's the max frequency that you can hit with this cg core supaman? passing burn tests i mean..
SupaMan
03-14-2004, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
what's the max frequency that you can hit with this cg core supaman? passing burn tests i mean..
crappy... 2.3GHz @ 1.7V
I'd love to think it's the motherboard, or the memory, but I've managed to rule out both as the issue. The core just wants more juice. Isnt overheating either.
eviLRuLeZ
03-14-2004, 03:09 PM
erm ok .. :/
maybe that cpu isnt that good.. i mean the cpu that you received from amd.. but others core cg may be good probably
we'll see that in a little while i hope ;)
ok guys i have had my 64 3200 system now for a week and i think i got the hang of it? right now i can run the system at 230x10 @ 2300mhz v-core 1.55v memory 2.9v everything else auto. now i am ocing thri the bios cause it seems more stable this way? also i had a question about the LDT settings? i had it set to 2x and it ran prime stable so i tired 2.5x and for some reason it shows up in sandra like its still set at 2x plus the memory scores stayed the same? i run the an50r with the an50s00y bios can anyone shed some light on this? also is 2300mhx at 1.55v decent for the 3200 chip?
thx guys perc,
eviLRuLeZ
03-14-2004, 09:58 PM
yes
but did you try to hit a higher frequency? higher than 2300..?
1.520 is original voltage for the cpu isn't it?
try to determine where your cpu is stable without changing his voltage and tell us :D
and then tell us what max freq that you can hit with that beast plz :)
s e t h
03-14-2004, 11:51 PM
yes that soud good Perc. 2300mhs for 1.55vcore is better than any chip i've run before. did you get the stepping before mounting it?
see thats the thing guys when i first got this thing it wouldnt do 2400mhz stable infact im not even sure if it will now? i did have a suicide shot of it at 2400mhz but it rebooted like seconds after i finshed getting the screen shot!! i have been running it at 220x10 for the last week then i decided to oc thru the bios since i wasnt getting all the great of ocs. thats when i tried 225x10 and finaly 230x10 and so far its prime stable and seems rock solid so im just going to leave it at 230x10 for a few weeks to let it burn in real nice :D my voltages are v-core 1.55v (*in the bios windows reports them as 1.52v) memory 2.9v agp 1.60v chipset 1.9v and my LDT auto set to 2.5 (i see no differance from 2x?) here is the stepping of the chip....ADA3200AEP5AP CAAAC 0345RPMW 9457135K 30810 i have only see this stepping once or twice before in this thread. infact when i first got it i thought i had a dud cause 2250-2300 was all i could get and that was using 1.7v on the v-core then i got mad and just set the v-core back to 1.55v and ran it at 220x10! thats how i found out i could run 2300mhz at 1.55v. i had no idea this was good kinda why i asked.... ok guys once again thx for your help you guys rock :D oh one more thing? LDT 2 or 2.5? im running 2.5x now and it doesnt seem any faster then 2x? thx...
peace perc,
s e t h
03-15-2004, 02:46 AM
2.5 is good except around 300fsb maybe go 2x
edit: actually that's what gigabyte does. i havn't ever had a shuttle that fast
eviLRuLeZ
03-15-2004, 02:49 AM
Perc
push that cpu to the limit now ! :D
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
Perc
push that cpu to the limit now ! :D
oh i will not to worry man im not afriad :D just rember guys im on air....
peace perc,
eviLRuLeZ
03-15-2004, 03:05 AM
:(
you're on air... i thought you were on watercooling or phase change :(
cya ;)
edit: i can't put an avatar in my signature, why? i mean i can't import a picture..
can you help me?
cpulloverclock
03-15-2004, 03:30 AM
WOWWW
361.13 and an 8 multiplier
impressive!!!!
TimeF0•ª30•b
Clock(MHz)F2889.02MHz(361.13x8.0”{j
CPUiƒƒbƒgî•ñjFAthlon64 3200+@CAAMC0343WPMW
—â‹pF“º“’“Û•ƒhƒ‰ƒCƒAƒC ƒX+ƒGƒ^ƒm[ƒ‹
VcoreF1.89V
VddrF3.36V
VioF3.70V
M/B(Chip Set)FGIGABYTE K8Npro (nForce3)
MemoryFSanmax BH-5 256MB
HDDFDeskster IC35L080
OSFWin2k SP4
http://www10.ocn.ne.jp/~leader/3200_11.jpg
Just got my 3400+ setup.
Stepping is ADA3400AEP5AP
CAAOC 0351UPMW
9835134L30351 - Malaysia.
Anyone know if this is a nice stepping or will i just have to find out for myself;-)
EmineM
03-15-2004, 06:27 AM
find out yourself :) the week 0351 chips seem to perform well
Pejsen
03-15-2004, 10:24 AM
Hey im running the Gigabyte k8n (non PRO and non XP).
Im still running with the "stock" BIOS, because i haven't read about them too much. Is there a BIOS availeble wich improves performance?
Phyrox
03-15-2004, 02:55 PM
Pejsen you can use lower multis and chaneg them in the bios instead of crappy clockgen and doing it time you boot by flashing the gigabyte ga-k8nnxp-940 bios :) it works without a hitch!
Phyrox
03-15-2004, 03:00 PM
hey can someone link me to the k8npro vmod
Pejsen
03-15-2004, 03:20 PM
Originally posted by Phyrox
hey can someone link me to the k8npro vmod
Hey Phyrox
thx for the help, i will defenently load new BIOS tomorrow :)
As for the Vcore mod: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20190
Very easy mod, indeed. I used a grabber on the IC pin10 and used the one of the motherboard "mountingholes" as GND (ground).
Notice that u should set Vcore at AUTO in BIOS or else u will risk loosing your CPU. Set the VR @ 50K ohms and turn slowly too increase the Vcore, please note that you should be carefull, at a certain point voltage grows ekstremly fast, so first time i tried i ended at 2.05Vcore HEHE. :e
However the K8N has an internal safety-thing that automaticly shuts down the board when Vcore is over 2.1V - been there, done that :p:
Ps. sorry for bad english
Popcicle
03-15-2004, 04:50 PM
cpulloverclock...
You are one wild and crazy guy with those voltages. Even
with a Vapo.
You have the Fire Department standing by with a Hook &
Ladder crew?
I read somewhere a while back.... that if a guy will leave the
FSB set at 201 in BIOS the AGP/PCI will remain locked while
using Clock/Gen. At least above 200 which is default.
I found out this works for me as the first time I tried Clock/Gen
I had to go back into BIOS and make the change to get a lock.
This is with a Shuttle AN50R but I don't see why it wouldn't
be the same for any nForce3 150 board.
;)
andyddr
03-16-2004, 12:16 AM
Did I do good :D
Bennah
03-16-2004, 03:57 AM
andyddr how much voltage is going to that memory? I take its KHX3200 BH-5?
andyddr
03-16-2004, 04:45 AM
Bennah there`s a mere 2.95v flowing thru these babies...want to guess again?
andyddr
03-16-2004, 12:00 PM
Err okay no-one wants to play `guess the ram` with me?
It`s A-Data Vitesta.
neo.life
03-17-2004, 05:41 AM
And no : look my config...geil is good ram?
ldlc
Processeur AMD Athlon 64 3200 229,93 €
Disque dur Hitachi 160 Go 7200 RPM 8 Mo Serial ATA 98,62 €
Alimentation Fortron 350W 44,27 €
Zalman CNPS7000A-Alcu 30€
o/c.UK
Sapphire ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB DDR TV-Out/DVI - Lite Retail (GX-017-SP)
£131.25 £131.25
Arctic Cooling VGA Silencer (SY-000-AR)
£6.50 £6.50
GeIL 512MB (2x256MB) PC4200 Ultra Series CAS3 (GL5124200DC) (MY-022-GL)
£96.12 £96.12
EmineM
03-17-2004, 10:43 AM
GeIL is not bad.. I personally prefer the Geil PC 3700 but personally I would rather buy some Kingston bh5 sticks
neo.life
03-17-2004, 11:15 AM
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/GeIL_memory.html
...what is the best?
EmineM
03-17-2004, 11:15 AM
Please dont spam.. theres an EDIT option that allows you to edit your previous post
neo.life
03-17-2004, 11:16 AM
GeIL 512MB (2x256MB) PC3500 Ultra Series CAS2
eminem, sorry:stick:
andyddr
03-17-2004, 02:43 PM
Guys what you think of this overclock? It`s done on air with a TT Venus 12 @ 3500RPM and 19C ambient air temp. No-matter what I do I can`t get over 2500 out of it even at 1.95v. Do you think if I phase change it`ll be a good clocker?
See steppings in my sig!
lil old me
03-18-2004, 09:01 AM
Is that board voltmodded at all?
andyddr
03-18-2004, 09:23 AM
Yip Vmodded on CPU only.
lil old me
03-18-2004, 10:40 AM
Very nice oc then! :)
My 3200+ won't go anywhere near 2400mhz, could you tell me what psu your using and what volts the rails are reading?
cpulloverclock
03-18-2004, 12:01 PM
According to the manufacturers of MB, the Socket 939 (MB and Proc) would be available at the end of may or at the beginning of june :mad: = ESTIMATE
andyddr
03-18-2004, 12:45 PM
lil old me I`m running a VERY crappy 350Watt PSU and MB5 says my rails are around 3.1v.
lil old me
03-18-2004, 01:13 PM
Guess i got a bad chip and you got a good one then! Our rigs are very similar but i cannot get past 2300mhz at 1.7v :(
andyddr
03-18-2004, 01:18 PM
Well post your steppings so we can have a look. May be that your cooling, RAM or even PSU is holding you back and not the chip...always the optemist
I cant get any higher than 10x230 at 1.65 vcore, 1:1 2-2-2-5 2.7v - Is that good or bad?
lil old me
03-18-2004, 01:21 PM
Originally posted by andyddr
Well post your steppings so we can have a look. May be that your cooling, RAM or even PSU is holding you back and not the chip...always the optemist
Unfortunatly i didnt write it down and cant look until sat.
However my cooling stock hs with 120mm ys tech 45C full load, ram kingston pc3000, psu is hiper 350watt, it seems to fluctuate and i thought that might be what it was but if yours is ok with a bad psu it might not be the problem.
misteroadster
03-18-2004, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by K32A
I cant get any higher than 10x230 at 1.65 vcore, 1:1 2-2-2-5 2.7v - Is that good or bad?
i think it's bad because you'd better decrease mutiplier ; and increase FSB , if your sticks don't support 255mhz, increase vddr to 3,3v (easy with AN50R) and pump up the FSB !!
9X255 FSB 1:1 would be very easy and much better.
8X287 FSB 1:1 a little higher , i think ; but if you'll do it ; i'll applause you ;)
I can't change my damn multiplier :( Every time i change it from BIOS it's set back to x10 when i come into Windows :( And with clockgen my computer freeze :(
What is the problem ?
misteroadster
03-19-2004, 03:24 AM
set your LDT to 2,5X
andyddr
03-19-2004, 03:27 AM
Make sure you click on `get values` before you change your multiplier settings. Once you change it click `apply FID` and then `set values` and your system should`nt freeze anymore.
Hey!
I've just tried that in clockgen, it seems to work fine if i set the multi to x9 and apply it, but when i want to run 2000MHz it freeze's x(
It is really p*ss*ng me off :(
misteroadster
03-19-2004, 04:27 AM
try to clearcmos and retry. :/
or try to set to 230X10 and set multiplier to 9.
LDT to 2,5X or 500MHZ
andyddr
03-19-2004, 04:28 AM
Take it up SLOWLY....don`t jump from say 200FSB to 230FSB in one jump, rather do it in 15MhZ intervals. Also (VERY IMPORTANT) set your FSB to 210 in the bios and then play in ClockGen. For some reason it like the system a bit overclocked before you push it further.
andyddr
03-19-2004, 04:41 AM
Also your Mem voltage may be too low. Try more juice...say 2.9v and see if it helps.
misteroadster
03-19-2004, 01:03 PM
i'd buy a 3000+ Today , an 0350 XPMW CAATC
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/3000MAX.JPG
i think i can do better.
neo.life
03-19-2004, 01:35 PM
french touch
3ghz now ^^
Originally posted by misteroadster
i'd buy a 3000+ Today , an 0350 XPMW CAATC
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/3000MAX.JPG
i think i can do better.
Nice CPU man! :thumbsup:
What cooling? Chilled water?
neo.life
03-19-2004, 02:09 PM
yes, watterchilled
I just got my D-tek Pro-core and a Hydor L20 home today, now i'm just waiting for my homemade waterblocks for cpu and gfx, and my little Biostar IDEQ200P Barebone :P It's goig to be fun ;) How high do you think i can get my cpu?
kakaroto
03-19-2004, 02:15 PM
Originally posted by neo.life
yes, watterchilled
Do some benches, or is this a critical shot???
nice thing btw... I have a CAATC 0404XPWM and I can take a shot from 2800Mhz.
These are nice chips :cool: 2550Mhz stable with 1.68v (Asetek water) :banana:
neo.life
03-19-2004, 02:19 PM
Humm les xpmw are good ^^
I buy too in 3000+ mister shop ( e-soph ) and i send a mail for stepping...
waiting responses et after gogogo ( adata4000 +an50rand tm 948U )
kakaroto
03-19-2004, 02:21 PM
Originally posted by neo.life
Humm les xpmw are good ^^
I buy too in 3000+ mister shop ( e-soph ) and i send a mail for stepping...
waiting responses et after gogogo ( adata4000 +an50rand tm 948U )
you mean extreem good.
Most XPMW can do 2500MHz stable in air/water and 2600MHz with chilled water.
I had a:
CAAMC 0449RPMW = 2250MHz max @1.8v:mad:
CAAOC 0350XPMW = 2550MHz max stable @1.79v
CAATC 0404XPMW = 2550MHz @1.70v still OCing
Lucky XPMW can do 2700MHz.:)
All with WATER and AIR.
I can get a 3000+ CBAPC 0404UPMW (CG stepping) :D
neo.life
03-19-2004, 02:38 PM
For me this
CAATC 0404XPMW = 2550MHz @1.70v still OCing
lovely !!!!
I buy thrusday my computer :D
Core cg is not very good for o/c
2.3ghz ( reviews of 3000+ in english site )
i think, i prefer good C0 of bad CG
kakaroto
03-19-2004, 02:41 PM
Originally posted by neo.life
For me this
CAATC 0404XPMW = 2550MHz @1.70v still OCing
lovely !!!!
I buy thrusday my computer :D
Core cg is not very good for o/c
2.3ghz ( reviews of 3000+ in english site )
i think, i prefer good C0 of bad CG
hehe, :toast: this chip we have clocks realy good with prommie.
It can take high speeds :D
Unfortunaly it is not a lucky chip but a good performer
misteroadster
03-19-2004, 02:41 PM
Originally posted by Zeus
Nice CPU man! :thumbsup:
What cooling? Chilled water?
Waterchilled by this machine :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/CHILLON.JPG
Thanks ;)
But i hope better tomorrow :)
Matshui
03-19-2004, 02:44 PM
Weee..... I also have the CAATC 0350XPMW, not a CAAOC as I first remembered (I have a bad memory), until now I have not clocked it higher than 2300Mhz air cooled with stock voltage, will have my watercooling set up in the weekend hopefully, so let's see what my 0350XPMW can do, those 2900Mhz is just lovely... :slobber:
SKYNET
03-19-2004, 05:51 PM
i fly so highhhhhhhhhh
i'm flying right up to the stars :D
i want more FSB... 400 and more, tips ?
http://downhill666.bei.t-online.de/Rechner/FSB_345_small.gif (http://downhill666.bei.t-online.de/Rechner/FSB_345_big.gif)
tombman
03-19-2004, 06:18 PM
worthless running on 400HT...
niaboc79
03-19-2004, 06:42 PM
i just receave my shuttle an50R
http://www.yamafoto.com/users/niaboc79/hr/13916/280-2-2-2-5.JPG
misteroadster
03-19-2004, 07:13 PM
good job my friend ;)
niaboc79
03-19-2004, 07:14 PM
Originally posted by misteroadster
good job my friend ;)
:toast:
It seems to work fine with decreasing the multiplier to x9 now. I dont know what the problem was?
240x9 1:1 2.9v to the memory, Auto timings :( I had just cleared CMOS and then i forgot to set the timings :$
I dont know if my memory can get higher?
misteroadster
03-20-2004, 12:42 PM
your problem was the timings , dont worry !!! ;)
you have to adjust now and obtain the best compromise.
koensa
03-20-2004, 02:49 PM
Originally posted by niaboc79
i just receave my shuttle an50R
http://www.yamafoto.com/users/niaboc79/hr/13916/280-2-2-2-5.JPG
280fsb 1/1 on 2-2-2-5 timings
OH MY GOD how much vdimm on that (probably) BH5 memory?
(why didnt you reply about our deal with the 3ghz barton)
andyddr
03-20-2004, 03:03 PM
280 on BH5/6? WTF?
Wow that is really good dancing bananas!!!
neo.life
03-20-2004, 03:40 PM
280 with BH5 corsair @ 3.7Vdimm ;)
SKYNET
03-20-2004, 04:07 PM
Originally posted by neo.life
280 with BH5 corsair @ 3.7Vdimm ;)
PC3200 LL rev. 1.1 or PC3500 C2 rev. 1.1 ?
alz85
03-21-2004, 12:31 AM
weeee, 3 GHz screenshot ^^
Not stable at this speed, max stable is 2.85 GHz.
Might try to get 2.9 GHz stable on 2.0v next time.
pics of setup: http://users.pandora.be/alz/dryice64/
CPU: CAATC 0405 VPMW
andyddr
03-21-2004, 12:50 AM
This is what I don`t get...all 3000+`s are Newcastle and the 3200+ and 3400+ are ClawHammer right? Well then why is post #2`s 3000+ (previous page) showing as a ClawHammer?
Link (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?postid=398962#post398962)
alz85
03-21-2004, 01:18 AM
Originally posted by andyddr
This is what I don`t get...all 3000+`s are Newcastle and the 3200+ and 3400+ are ClawHammer right? Well then why is post #2`s 3000+ (previous page) showing as a ClawHammer?
Link (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?postid=398962#post398962)
Because it's an older version of CPU-Z
Originally posted by misteroadster
your problem was the timings , dont worry !!! ;)
you have to adjust now and obtain the best compromise.
Yes.
I will try later... Maybe 2-3-3-6 will work?
EmineM
03-21-2004, 01:33 PM
K32A are you sure GeIL PC 3700 are able to run 2-2-2-5 as you are saying on your sig? I highly doubt it
niaboc79
03-21-2004, 04:09 PM
Originally posted by SKYNET
PC3200 LL rev. 1.1 or PC3500 C2 rev. 1.1 ?
PC3200LL rev 1.1, it's BH5
niaboc79
03-21-2004, 04:12 PM
Originally posted by koensa
280fsb 1/1 on 2-2-2-5 timings
OH MY GOD how much vdimm on that (probably) BH5 memory?
(why didnt you reply about our deal with the 3ghz barton)
my barton give me only 35s
3.7v
TinTin
03-21-2004, 09:55 PM
My A64 3200+ is now at 2740MHz, 3D-benchable
http://hk-submit.no-ip.com:2/bbs/attachments/K4uq_3200+2740.jpg
At 2790MHz, superpi1M completed.
http://hk-submit.no-ip.com:2/bbs/attachments/GQcj_3200+@2790superpi.jpg
20MHz more than before :D
paul007
03-22-2004, 02:35 AM
tintin can you tell me where ya got oyur wallpaper??
and as always nice clocking my man :)
Tin tin that 3dmark01 score is 1000 marks low . compare to my score below sig
edit: nm you are running ddr 333 setting
Originally posted by EmineM
K32A are you sure GeIL PC 3700 are able to run 2-2-2-5 as you are saying on your sig? I highly doubt it
Yes, i run at 2-2-2-5, 2.7v now ;)
Wee, got my cpu up to 2400MHz, but my memory could'nt handle it at 1:1 so i just ran it at 2:1
TinTin
03-22-2004, 08:04 AM
Originally posted by yuri
Tin tin that 3dmark01 score is 1000 marks low . compare to my score below sig
edit: nm you are running ddr 333 setting
Reason:
1) Windows 2000 + DX 8.1 will have about 500marks more
2) The Game 1 low details always has some fluctuations in the frame rate, if you run this test for, say, 10 times, you will see at least, there is a score have about 20fps in average more for the same setting :D
3) You are running your CPU/RAM at 1:1 ratio
Totally, 1000marks...hahaha....
:D
Hey!
I hope that you guys can help my friend ;) He's just got a A64 3200+ caaoc 0352spmw but it will not go higher than 213x10!!! Can any one of you get some data on that chip for me?
Greets
misteroadster
03-23-2004, 11:30 AM
A64 3000+ 0350 XPMW CAATC AEP4AP 9
Just Waterchilled.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/2958screen.JPG
I can do better , a little , .... but better :D
misteroadster
03-23-2004, 11:32 AM
I am testing an FX-53 actually. :rolleyes:
cooling AMD Boxed :
stock vcore: 2510 stable prime 95
1,65V: 2580 stable prime 95.
max screen 2749 Mhz@1,65V
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/MAXaircool165.JPG
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/prime2588.JPG
I can do very very very Much better :D
eviLRuLeZ
03-23-2004, 12:47 PM
wow
impressive mister :D
tooning
03-23-2004, 01:10 PM
mister,
with the cooling box fan it's: :banana: :D
misteroadster
03-24-2004, 07:26 PM
Waterchilled FX53 : Rock Stable Prime 2960Mhz 1,85Vcore.
But cpumark and superpi 2M doesn't work , i think there is a problem with my ram Corsair Ecc 3200 (CH5).
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/3156.JPG
cpulloverclock
03-24-2004, 10:56 PM
try with 2v for 3.2G
between ur FX-51 and FX-53 there are 100MHz at same voltage
I see 3275MHz rock stable in cascade for Tom Holck
:D
tombman
03-25-2004, 05:55 PM
1.) Which mainboard?
2.) What cpu temp?
3.) Nice, i´m trying to get a fx53 too to replace my fx51 ;) (can you get me a retail one fast? ;))
misteroadster
03-25-2004, 07:11 PM
Mobo is SK8N cpu temp is very variable.
#1 ORB 9700Pro with a non Pro
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/WChampion.JPG
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/29Sec.JPG
SKYNET
03-26-2004, 01:48 AM
http://downhill666.bei.t-online.de/Rechner/memory@323_small.gif (http://downhill666.bei.t-online.de/Rechner/memory@323_big.gif)
IvanAndreevich
03-27-2004, 12:59 PM
HOLY SH|T THOSE COLORS ARE KILLING ME!
SKYNET
03-27-2004, 01:01 PM
i love this colors ;)
ogica
03-28-2004, 02:49 PM
what mobo for oc an a64 3200 ?now i have an abit kv8 max3 but it's not lock pci agp :s
misteroadster
03-28-2004, 03:48 PM
AN50R for poweroverclocker's who wants more than 3,5 to vdimm
or gigabyte K8NPRO for soft OC.
nutcase
03-28-2004, 10:27 PM
Ok, Now that I have a Decent Overclock to show.. Time to post it:
Shuttle AN50R with Vdimm and Vcore Mods
Athlon64 3200+ (CAAAC 0345SPMW)
OCZ PC3200 Plat LE (2x256mb) @ 2-2-2-5 @ 3.6V Vdimm, 5:4
Prometia Mach I (no Mods) for Cooling.
RootX
03-29-2004, 04:34 AM
3.6V for 220MHz ????
way too much voltage man...
edit: forgot my manners, nice clock, :)
nutcase
03-29-2004, 05:49 AM
Originally posted by RootX
3.6V for 220MHz ????
way too much voltage man...
edit: forgot my manners, nice clock, :)
Too Lazy to Take the Vdimm Down whem I was Running 1:1 ;)
Hi guys!
I just got my gigabyte K8N non-pro todya because my Shuttle An50R was sick :( Well, is this K8N a very bad overclocker or what? I cant get it stable at 2200MHz... I've tried all kind of vcore selection in bios...
Whats wrong`?
I dont know if its the mobo there's seeing the wrong kin of volts from my PSU, because MBM5 says that:
Core 0: 1.49v
Core 1: 2.52v
+3.33 : 3.22v
+5.00 : 2.85v
+12.00: 11.19v
They are very lower than they were on my shuttle :s
Could a bios update be the solution?
EmineM
03-29-2004, 10:25 AM
well your 5 v is a joke...
just 2.85v where it is supposed to be around 4.82v
its must be your PSU
No, it is'nt my PSU... On my shuttle an50r it was around the 4.85v
Matshui
03-29-2004, 11:07 AM
It is your settings in MBM5, when I change something in my settings my voltages act the same way...
Okay... But is the K8N mobo a bad overclocker? Because i can't get it stable at 2200mhz... even at 1.7vcore
Matshui
03-29-2004, 11:58 AM
Are you clocking throug BIOS or using ClockGen..?
I have heard that the K8N has problems when trying to boot with more that 230Mhz FSB, could be that problem you are running in to..
I have set vcore to 1.700v, LDT to x2.5 and chipset and vdimm to +0.3v in bios and booting up at 210x10...
Increasing fsb with clockgen to 220, and even there it is not stable at all!
Damn... I dont know what to do`?
s e t h
03-29-2004, 12:21 PM
it's not a bad board. it is a well known good overclocker. it does have some quirks but then again they just about all do these days with us doing all the beta testing.
Have i done anything wrong since it wont get stable?
lil old me
03-29-2004, 12:46 PM
My 5v line is like that too guess it must be the board.
I posted a couple of weeks back about my oc and someone wanted to know the codes on my chip finally got around to fitting my watercooling setup so here they are.
ada3200aep5ap
caamc 0347vpmw
9359625k30176
I've gained a small oc from using water gone from 2260mhz to 2328 mhz stable. 1.7v, my psu seems very bad so i think thats holding me back. Im 44C full load 29 idle.
misteroadster
03-29-2004, 01:36 PM
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/Render.JPG
niaboc79
03-29-2004, 01:46 PM
i think my shuttle AN50R is dead too
shimmishim
03-29-2004, 03:29 PM
anyone know if the a64 3200+'s from newegg being shipped out now are CG stepping or still C0 stepping?
i know the mobile ones are CG just wanted to see if the nonmobile ones were as well.
tooning
03-30-2004, 04:29 AM
hello, I can't beat 265 1/1 with my k8n pro and my 3000+ . however I bench stable A 320 of fsb with the RAM in desynchro 166. my RAM is A-data 4000 .
same results with 2,6v or 2,9v 265 stable but not anymore
tooning
03-30-2004, 11:29 PM
Originally posted by tooning
hello, I can't beat 265 1/1 with my k8n pro and my 3000+ . however I bench stable A 320 of fsb with the RAM in desynchro 166. my RAM is A-data 4000 .
same results with 2,6v or 2,9v 265 stable but not anymore
now i can do 8,5x280 synchro 1:1 with a litle gain of performance.
i can beat 4x320 in synchro 1:1
why i can't do more than 280 with a cpu frequency near 2400mhz ?
the X8 multiplicator seems to work bad , but with 7,5 multiplicator it's the same : can't reach 280 .
actually the best combo for me is 8,5x280 , it give me the best performance but i want a litlle more .
:stick:
edit: i know the memory isn't running at 280 when i set a x.5 muliplicator , it run at 266mhz
CodeRed
03-31-2004, 02:22 AM
Originally posted by tooning
edit: i know the memory isn't running at 280 when i set a x.5 muliplicator , it run at 266mhz
whats this?
my rig does better at 3dmark using 8.5x327 166 ratio than 9x309 166 ratio.
Does this 266 MHz effect only come into play for 1:1 ratio
tooning
03-31-2004, 05:41 AM
Originally posted by CodeRed
whats this?
my rig does better at 3dmark using 8.5x327 166 ratio than 9x309 166 ratio.
Does this 266 MHz effect only come into play for 1:1 ratio
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
tooning
03-31-2004, 05:47 AM
Originally posted by tooning
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
ok, i have more info :
it's a problem when you use half multiplier AND 1:1 ratio
this problem not exist when you use half multiplier and an asynchronous ratio ;)
Formann
03-31-2004, 06:09 AM
Originally posted by tooning
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
tooning
03-31-2004, 06:42 AM
Originally posted by Formann
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
yes it's true : i'n my case it's :
8.5x282/9 = 266
CodeRed
03-31-2004, 01:28 PM
Originally posted by Formann
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
thanks, now its clear
so 1:1 uses integral memory dividers
for me it doesnt matter anyway since I have to use the 166 ratio (mem is limited to 267 MHz @ 3.6V)
cpulloverclock
04-02-2004, 05:23 AM
the memory controller of my 3400+ is dead---> rma :mad:
Originally posted by lil old me
My 5v line is like that too guess it must be the board.
I tired of this... I'm sending the K8N back and get my money back and sending the AN50R to Sweden and get it repaired (If i can find the warranty proof?)
lil old me
04-02-2004, 05:54 AM
Originally posted by K32A
I tired of this... I'm sending the K8N back and get my money back and sending the AN50R to Sweden and get it repaired (If i can find the warranty proof?)
I tried setting the voltage in mbm settings to 'GA-8KNXP' for my k8n mbm now reads my 5v as 5.06. My 12v reading also went up a bit.
Well, i did also try that, but it did'nt help either :( - I think that i just have to wait getting my AN50R back :(
CrashOv3r1De
04-02-2004, 04:50 PM
Not sure if you can see in pic but its:
A64 3400+ @ 2.75ghz
Gigabyte K8NPro
KHX3200 BH-5 @ 2-2-2-6
CPU/14
1.7vcore/2.95vdimm/2.95vddq
Still plenty of headroom imho. Board is completely stock. WIll be doing mods soon!
3dmark stable 24/7 gaming rig
SuperPi 1M 34Sec
http://a7.cpimg.com/image/39/75/31715897-0e63-02000199-.jpg
gabbax
04-02-2004, 10:27 PM
http://w1.825.telia.com/~u82509111/Pifast%202800mhz.jpg
Heres my new mem chip :) looking good :) Its a HyperX PC3000, do you know if its a BH5 or BH6 ?
Running in 2.5-2-2-5, I cant run CL2 if i use 1:1.. just if i use 200mhz option in BIOS btw.
http://home.no.net/geekporn/asd/261mhz.JPG
Originally posted by CrashOv3r1De
Not sure if you can see in pic but its:
A64 3400+ @ 2.75ghz
Gigabyte K8NPro
KHX3200 BH-5 @ 2-2-2-6
CPU/14
1.7vcore/2.95vdimm/2.95vddq
Still plenty of headroom imho. Board is completely stock. WIll be doing mods soon!
3dmark stable 24/7 gaming rig
SuperPi 1M 34Sec
http://a7.cpimg.com/image/39/75/31715897-0e63-02000199-.jpg
What cooling? Very good clocks at 1.7v :)
kyosen
04-03-2004, 07:16 PM
CG core is wonderful:)
M/B: ASUS SK8V / BIOS: 1002.019
CPU: Athlon64 FX-53 CAABC 0410MPMW
CPU Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
Memory: Corsair CMX512RE-PC3200LLPT(CH-5) 512MB x4
VGA: Quadro2Pro(AGP, GeForce2Ultra-modded)
HDD: IBM DTLA-307015
Power suplly: Zippy-460W
Vcore: 1.987V, Vddr: 3.350V, Vio: 3.550V
OS: Windows Server 2003
MEM: 2:1(DDR400)-CL2.0-7-14-2-2-1-5-2
SuperPI 104man(=1M): 25sec
Facedeharicot
04-03-2004, 07:24 PM
very impressive kyosen :D
s e t h
04-04-2004, 01:07 AM
yea that rips kyosen. don't suppose you've got a radeon handy?
nice synced busses.
edit: if it wasn't via. doh
A64 3200+ 0330
2.5ghz
34sec :)
watercooling
http://home.no.net/geekporn/asd/34sec.JPG
CrashOv3r1De
04-05-2004, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by Orak
What cooling? Very good clocks at 1.7v :)
nVentiv Mach2 "stock"
This setup is screaming for a vmod. I have to run the memory at 166 to get 2.7ghz I cant even do 220fsb @ 1:1 with 2.95v :(
Originally posted by CrashOv3r1De
nVentiv Mach2 "stock"
This setup is screaming for a vmod. I have to run the memory at 166 to get 2.7ghz I cant even do 220fsb @ 1:1 with 2.95v :(
speed up and get some mods dude :) you realy need it asap
Formann
04-06-2004, 11:37 AM
Got another one a few days ago.. was hoping for a CG chip, but no.
A64 3200+
0351 CAAOC
"9"..160
Cooled by a Vapo PE.. poor thing.
Stable? It was.. now its acting up on me. It refuses to run nature in 01 at more than 2650. I also suspect my AN50R to be the sinner here, cause I can no longer run 270HTT with 2.5LTD. Have to run 2x.
http://privat.bluezone.no/forman/images/32sekpi.JPG
2PiZzA
04-08-2004, 10:30 PM
Tell me please, does anyone own a CG-revision of A64?
I was watching this thread and it seems that everyone have C0.
n00by
04-09-2004, 10:19 AM
Originally posted by misteroadster
AN50R for poweroverclocker's who wants more than 3,5 to vdimm
or gigabyte K8NPRO for soft OC. Whats the stock vcore/vdimm/vdd voltages on the shuttle? Any other 64 boards that have the vdimm option to 3.3? thanks :)
Matshui
04-09-2004, 01:36 PM
The stock vDimm voltages on the Shuttle is; 2,6v, 2,7v, 2,8v and 2,9v...
The vCore is from someplace under 1v to 1,7v and the vdd I can't remember - but it is something like max 1,8v or so...
paul007
04-09-2004, 01:58 PM
at 1.725v
ownage
http://jason57.iwarp.com/3ghz.JPG
Formann
04-09-2004, 02:03 PM
Originally posted by paul007
at 1.725v
ownage
Holy crap.. at only 1.72v ?!?!
Whats your water and cpu temp?
Nice chip you´ve got there, and of course nice OC :)
paul007
04-09-2004, 02:06 PM
thanks is chilled ethanol and it is "VERY" cool.. down below -65c
cpu temp during all benching never dropped below -28c in bios ;) botto0m of block maintained a load temp of -56c wish I had access to a 20k VR for the vmod today as I think i could have pulled off some 3100mhz benches :)
more to follow and opf course 3d and a top spot on the 3dmark orb :)
2PiZzA
04-09-2004, 02:15 PM
PLEASE answer my question. ANYBODY.
Tell me please, does anyone own a CG-revision of A64?
I was watching this thread and it seems that everyone have C0.
paul007
04-09-2004, 02:19 PM
I think all fx53's are CG's if so ask OPP or XMAN they both ahve these chips.
2PiZzA
04-09-2004, 03:27 PM
I'm not talking aboun FX. I'm asking about Athlon64 (No FX).
paul007
04-09-2004, 03:32 PM
ahh well then out of the 100 forums I vist I have not seen one :(
2PiZzA
04-09-2004, 04:06 PM
paul007 hmm..... I looked at this: http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25759.pdf
and found out that there're A64 CG.
paul007
04-09-2004, 04:15 PM
oh yeah there has been but I dont know when there are going to start shipping :(
EmineM
04-09-2004, 05:24 PM
so paul where are your ownage 3d benches ;)
paul007
04-09-2004, 06:10 PM
so paul where are your ownage 3d benches
stock 9800xt was dishish out in the 24.5-25k+ region the rest you all have to wait for till I get the card cooling on and have the time to vmod the 9800xt and so on..
Gaurt. 30k ;)
Matshui
04-11-2004, 06:39 PM
I might aswell publish my currently OC result - not maxed out yet..!!
CPU is a 3000+ CAATC 0350XPMW
http://img21.photobucket.com/albums/v64/Jakob.Soendergaard/OverClocking/250x10.jpg
This is 112% stable and for everyday use - at only 47°c full load with watercooling...
I need to do the vCore mod to get much higher as my board maxes at 1,7v.....
Anyway there will be more from me later on, as I will convince myself about trying with 1,7v in vCore.... :rolleyes:
I'm doing a SuperPI in 39sec. on 2400MHz with 200MHz on RAM, is that okey or is it too slow?
(1M ;))
andyddr
04-12-2004, 09:17 AM
39s for a 2400 A64 is not good. But them what are the timings on your mem? You should be seing around 36s with decent timings or higher clocks. I got 35s with 2.6g and mem at 3-4-4-7 at 270FSB
Edit: Sorry not 2.6G but rather 2.46G
http://www.planetmars.co.za/forums/uploads/post-88-1079392372.jpg
nutcase
04-12-2004, 09:41 AM
anybody going to try the New Athlon64 2800+??
andyddr
04-12-2004, 09:59 AM
Yeah I`d like to. I saw a review a few days ago that showed it faster than the 3X00+`s in memory bandwidth.
Originally posted by K32A
I'm doing a SuperPI in 39sec. on 2400MHz with 200MHz on RAM, is that okey or is it too slow?
(1M ;))
Its a bit slow yes, what timings do you run ?
i got 35sec with 2500mhz and 227mhz on my mem. 2-2-2-5.
And my record is 34sec with2500mhz and 250mhz on my mem. 2.5-2-2-5 :)
I think it is because i'm only running 200MHz on my mem. and auto timings?
2PiZzA
04-14-2004, 09:21 AM
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/268_2cpu.png
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/268_2mem.png
Here's what I got.
Zalman 7000CU on CPU.
3.6V on memory
Albatron k8x800 proII mobo
Swiftech cooling soon
Look at the memory timings. It's not photoshop. Memory is OCZ premier series - the cheapest memory from OCZ.
andyddr
04-14-2004, 10:46 AM
Good god. That`s pretty amazing stuff 2PiZzA! If you EVER want to sell your mem I`ll buy!
2PiZzA
04-14-2004, 11:01 AM
This mem did only 217 2-2-2-5 with vmod on p4c800-e deluxe.
It's funkin weird. I just can't believe it.
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 02:10 AM
Oh, Lord. Look what I did with air cooling.
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/2560.png
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
Oh, Lord. Look what I did with air cooling.
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/2560.png
Hehe, printscreen stable ? :)
lil old me
04-16-2004, 03:09 AM
Not going to last long with 1.9v!! :eek:
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 03:29 AM
1.9v is not a problem. Gonna vmod mobo for higher vcore.
It's realy printscreen stable. But if you look at http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/search.php , my a64 is the fastest 3200+ with air cooling. With the highest FSB and memclk.
but 2464MHz = 260x9.5 @ 1.8VDC is absolutely stable. With 2-2-2-5 mem timings in synchro.
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 08:25 AM
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/284mem.png
beat that
Bennah
04-16-2004, 09:30 AM
I think these do :D
Some results that luihed got :eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/292
:eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/335c
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 10:08 AM
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
andyddr
04-16-2004, 10:10 AM
If that is`nt a Photoshop job then it`s the best BH5/6 I`ve ever seen. What system was this on and is that a buffered or unbuffered score?
andyddr
04-16-2004, 10:12 AM
PiZza we think alike (u just type faster than me) :)
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 10:24 AM
andyddr My split keyboard helps me a lot doing that. :)
Now my Super_Pi is on 36 sec. - It's good with some faster RAM :)
http://keza.port5.com/Super_pi!.JPG
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 10:55 AM
K32A Not bad. Increase VCore. You'll get higher clocks.
I got 35 sec. It's maximum on air.
2PiZza I can't increase the vcore with out a mod. And i'm sending the motherboard in to get it fixed at the place where I bought it. There's some small problems when i update windows... What do tou think my RAM can run at 2.9v ? And with what cas.?
cpulloverclock
04-16-2004, 11:55 AM
with my second 3400+ I get 2460MHz rock stable at 1.4v
it is worst than the first
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore?
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 01:06 PM
K32A It's nice. pretty nice.
cpulloverclock
04-16-2004, 02:41 PM
Originally posted by K32A
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore? yes and 2700 at 1.63v
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 03:30 PM
cpulloverclock Someday I gonna change may 3200+ on 3400+ or 3700+ or whatever.
Update. Got 2580 at 1.92. Screenshot stable. :)
Bennah
04-16-2004, 04:47 PM
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
Yea it is not a PS job. Its a real result that he got.
But using the A64 meant that it was'nt a real 335MHz, its a little lower I think.
macci posted somewhere on these forums, showing how you can work it out, but I cant find it now :(
I think his rig was
A64 3200+ (waterchilled)
AN50R
KHX3200
Pretty decent isnt it :)
2PiZzA
04-16-2004, 05:31 PM
Anyway, you're all using nforce3 and i'm using k8t800. THat's a big difference. So there're no problems with fake clocks.
SKYNET
04-16-2004, 05:34 PM
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
1.9v is not a problem. Gonna vmod mobo for higher vcore.
It's realy printscreen stable. But if you look at http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/search.php , my a64 is the fastest 3200+ with air cooling. With the highest FSB and memclk.
but 2464MHz = 260x9.5 @ 1.8VDC is absolutely stable. With 2-2-2-5 mem timings in synchro.
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
2PiZzA
04-17-2004, 12:03 AM
SKYNET This works on Nforce3. I've just tried 257*10 - no problems. But my CPU cannot work at higher frequncies.
So it's definately not 'bout me.
Bennah
04-17-2004, 07:30 AM
Originally posted by SKYNET
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
So thats how ya work out the mem speed :)
FSB / 10 x Multi = Mem Speed :)
:toast:
I got my garden hose directly connected to my watercooling now :D results later :)
cpulloverclock
04-17-2004, 05:51 PM
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
misteroadster
04-17-2004, 06:45 PM
it's promising cpull ;)
this is my best Superpi 1M with my 0338 UPMW 3200+ and BH-5 KHX3200
K8Npro Vcore moded , mod Vio=Vddr 3,36V
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s.JPG
misteroadster
04-17-2004, 06:53 PM
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ? don't forget the 3200's bandwith is very lower at 260FSb 1:1 than FX at 200.
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/FX55Vs3200-2600mhz.JPG
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
what bios did you use ?
andyddr
04-18-2004, 12:59 AM
Originally posted by misteroadster
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ?
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/FX55Vs3200-2600mhz.JPG
A little unfair IMO. Fx53 has higher mem timings and lower FSB. Obvious that it would come second. But the fact that it still beats 3200+ in some tests show`s it`s a better chip.
cpulloverclock
04-18-2004, 03:30 AM
Originally posted by Orak
what bios did you use ? F11 in 16-7-2-2-5-2-2-1-3 I believe
I can get 36s at 2280-2288MHZ with a better fsb
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/36s.JPG
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.