PDA

View Full Version : 2.4c or 2.6c for waterchilling?


luihed
10-03-2003, 01:24 AM
I just finished my first waterchiller and Im one happy camper..... I can do 4gs screenie and 3850mhz 3dmarks but my problem is that my hyperx can only do 309fsb (5:4) at 2-2-2-5 and max 313fsb at crap timings..... I know I can switch to 3:2 but I would think tht the performance loss will be quite substantial.....

My question is would I be better of with 309fsb (5:4) with the 2.4c or 290+ with a 2.6c? It was really fun making this chiller but in reality Ill be gaining only 3fsb from my old watercooling...... also can I expect 3850mhz too from a 2.6c or did I just lucked out on this 2.4c? Thanks ....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7061591

http://www3.telus.net/luis99/4gs

kromosto
10-03-2003, 01:31 AM
nearly same problem with my hyperx to can run more than 245 2-2-2-5 stable ddr500 at 3.2 volt can be useable for windos but in gaming or banchmarking it is unstable

wespwnzu
10-03-2003, 08:35 AM
hmn.. i heard the 2.4c actually gets higher on good cooling then the 2.6c can, so judging by that, i'd say go with the 2.4, plus u save 90 bucks...