View Full Version : Quad CF warming up run: 38.9k '05, 30.9k '06
nachthymnen
07-05-2008, 07:08 AM
First run for me with ATI cards.
Must test more the setup, this is a warming up run with low cpu/gpu frequencies.
Alot of problems with the vga in '03...
GT1 is OK but all the other tests run very slow:shrug:
Nature with cards @ 890/900 score only 680fps with 5750mhz QX:shakes::shrug:
Now the board won't boot so I've clean all and I'll retry tomorrow.
I will upload the score to FM later.
SETUP:
15L LN2
Dimastec BenchTable
Dragon F1 EE
QX9650 L744B156 1,928V(-150c)
Foxconn BlackOps(P04)
2x Asus HD 3870X2 Top stock cooled(no LOD BIAS)
2x1GB CellShock 14400
Sirtec High Power 1200W
Hitachi 120GB Sata
HP W2007v
Windows Vista+Sp1 non tweaked
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080705155959_Immagine049.jpg
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080705160022_38036.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4355342
'06 with really low cpu/gpu freq.
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080705160028_30701.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7350423
I can close '06 easy also @ 5735mhz:D
Tomorrow I hope to improve my score.
Updated:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706105919_30929copy.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7357944
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706110337_38916copy.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4356497
ZoLKoRn
07-05-2008, 07:13 AM
Very nice result for first run on ATI :up: can't wait to see more :D
k|ngp|n
07-05-2008, 07:14 AM
NICE NICE :clap:. Maybe the board will boot tommorrow for you. Always happens like that :D
nachthymnen
07-05-2008, 07:19 AM
Very nice result for first run on ATI :up: can't wait to see more :D
Tks Zolkorn:)
Unfortunately the really high temps don't help for the cards:(
As I say cpu can bench higher but for now I'm happy.
Tomorrow I want 31k '06:D
@ k|ngp|n: Tks Vince:)
Yes I hope the board will boot again later, this evening I will try with Tuniq.
Tomorrow I will push the chip over 5750mhz with a little bit of luck:)
LardArse
07-05-2008, 07:19 AM
hey... nice warm... but , you have the best and only QF OC Panel that works with the black ops... why not put this weapon to use? :)
nachthymnen
07-05-2008, 07:27 AM
hey... nice warm... but , you have the best and only QF OC Panel that works with the black ops... why not put this weapon to use? :)
Hey tks Peter:)
You're right:(
But unfortunately I'm not able to solder the panel on the board:(
I will must to send the board to my friend Marco(Zilla) for this work:)
fubarswe
07-05-2008, 08:19 AM
.., always nice sweet results from You my friend.., and as always I wish you the best of luck in coming benches! :-)
71 (Bryan)
07-05-2008, 08:57 AM
man, i wish i had the money to do that
Pegazus
07-05-2008, 09:00 AM
Great score Man:up:
You and I have something in common. :p:
Now I bench the same system as you like a mirror :D
And I think you have the same issues. Can not set RAM to higher FSB didn't you. :confused:
I can run 3D06 @ 5.74 Ghz (410x14) 3870X2 @ 904/945 CF-X but score is below 30K (catalyst 8.3). It lower than I use to run in another system @ 5.46 Ghz.:(
I don't know why? Do you have any suggestion ? Thank you for advance :p:
BTW : congratz with your score :up:
edit : Score with 5.70 Ghz . Poor score :(
nachthymnen
07-05-2008, 09:10 AM
.., always nice sweet results from You my friend.., and as always I wish you the best of luck in coming benches! :-)
Tks my friend:)
This is a test run just for understand something of the CF:rolleyes:
1 kit of my CS is dead:(
I'm a stupid, I've used the Catalyst 8.5 that is not FM approved so no HOF in FM for me:(:shakes:
M.Beier
07-05-2008, 04:14 PM
Looks very good my friend..
How did you like working with Vista, did it cause you any problems?
purecain
07-05-2008, 05:38 PM
hope you have good luck with the rest of your session....
TheKarmakazi
07-05-2008, 05:42 PM
very nice work! 30k in 06 is nothing to laugh at! great job!
philbrown23
07-05-2008, 06:03 PM
what are you using to overclock the graphics cards??? my CCC will not allow memory over 970 and core over 860?? and rive only does one core, and ati tool wont even load the clocks?? help me out brotha!
Pegazus
07-05-2008, 09:06 PM
what are you using to overclock the graphics cards??? my CCC will not allow memory over 970 and core over 860?? and rive only does one core, and ati tool wont even load the clocks?? help me out brotha!
Use Riva for first GPU then AMDGPUClocktool do the rest ;)
http://www.overclex.net/data/images/news//HD4850/amdgpuclocktool-9.8.rar
Oliver
07-06-2008, 12:57 AM
Sweet work nacthy...
Looking forward to the full run, when u tear everything up...
Keep pushing it...
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 02:02 AM
Updated with huge cpu frequencies in '05:eek:
SETUP:
15L LN2
Dimas bechtable
Dragon F1EE
QX9650 L744B156 1,94v(-151c)
Foxconn BlackOps(P04)
2x Asus HD3870X2 Top(stock cooled)
2x1GB Kingston HyperX 1800
Sirtec High Power 1200W
Aquamark for fun with GTX stock cooled:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706105904_327360.jpg
A '06 with low cpu score:(
NO LOD BIAS used
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706105919_30929copy.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7357944
I love this one:D
4 Core enabled and no affinity!
NO LOD BIAS used:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706110337_38916copy.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=4356497
The final score can be higher with higher FSB, next time:up:
Little up in Pifast:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706110432_pif16.34.jpg
Wprime 32M:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706110627_wp6.739.jpg
I forgot to say: Kingston Power!:eek:
Leghorn
07-06-2008, 02:11 AM
Nice CFX start Giorgio :up:
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 02:19 AM
Nice CFX start Giorgio :up:
Tks Max:)
Next time LN2 on chipset and higher FSB for better scores:D
George_o/c
07-06-2008, 02:39 AM
Holy shi(f)t ! :eek:
Giorgio, I've told you in the past that with every LN2 session of yours, you 're getting better and better :) Guess what ? What I said can be applied to that session too :clap: Great start with CFX m8, all the best for you in your next sessions :up:
P.S I can see that you also experienced the same thing as others, as far as BlackOps is concerned. The 8 phase digital PWM is doing very well its job, increasing the cpu frequency more than other mobos ;) (I never saw you running 3D 06 @ 5760, or 3D 05 @ 5820)
DeDaL
07-06-2008, 02:45 AM
Damn nice!
PCI-E clocks ?
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 04:35 AM
Holy shi(f)t ! :eek:
Giorgio, I've told you in the past that with every LN2 session of yours, you 're getting better and better :) Guess what ? What I said can be applied to that session too :clap: Great start with CFX m8, all the best for you in your next sessions :up:
P.S I can see that you also experienced the same thing as others, as far as BlackOps is concerned. The 8 phase digital PWM is doing very well its job, increasing the cpu frequency more than other mobos ;) (I never saw you running 3D 06 @ 5760, or 3D 05 @ 5820)
Tks my friend.:)
Now I must freeze NB for high FSB and better scores:up:
BlackOps is a beast with QX:eek:
Cpu is not to the limit, I've run '05 @ 5.8Ghz and after this @ 5824mhz without any problem:eek::D
Also in '06 I can bench so close to 5.8Ghz.
Hey, in Vista my chip run incredibly better than in XP:shrug:
Can't close Aquamark over 5.78Ghz in Win XP:shrug:
@ Dedal: Tks M8!
PCI @ only 105mhz:):(
2 pics:up:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706135314_Immagine050.jpg
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706135409_Immagine051.jpg
My first time in HOF FM:eek:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706141532_Hoffm06C.jpg
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080706141551_Hoffm05C.jpg
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 06:54 AM
Great score Man:up:
You and I have something in common. :p:
Now I bench the same system as you like a mirror :D
And I think you have the same issues. Can not set RAM to higher FSB didn't you. :confused:
I can run 3D06 @ 5.74 Ghz (410x14) 3870X2 @ 904/945 CF-X but score is below 30K (catalyst 8.3). It lower than I use to run in another system @ 5.46 Ghz.:(
I don't know why? Do you have any suggestion ? Thank you for advance :p:
BTW : congratz with your score :up:
edit : Score with 5.70 Ghz . Poor score :(
For higher FSB/RAM I think we need to put the NB under LN2.
Have you try the Catalyst 8.6?
intel101
07-06-2008, 07:07 AM
Real big 3d mark scores, good job.
Jason's ex-qx9650 sure doing well.
Disable 2 cores on the qx 9650 and max it out, as every little cpu mhz count for aquamark and 05.
2 cores only for 5900mhz 05 and aquamark should be possible. :confused:
Four cores needed only for 06 m8. ;)
Pegazus
07-06-2008, 07:08 AM
For higher FSB/RAM I think we need to put the NB under LN2.
Have you try the Catalyst 8.6?
Thank friend :)
Yes I try 8.6 first but it very low score so I turn to 8.3 nothing better here:(
I try use bios P04 as yours but it can not boot even in 400 FSB :(
I think may be I set something wrong in bios.
Can you please share you bios setting.
Thank you very much
:clap::clap: nice scores nathy :clap::clap:
next week is my turn :D
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 07:16 AM
Real big 3d mark scores, good job.
Jason's ex-qx9650 sure doing well.
Disable 2 cores on the qx 9650 and max it out, as every little cpu mhz count for aquamark and 05.
2 cores only for 5900mhz 05 and aquamark should be possible. :confused:
Four cores needed only for 06 m8. ;)
Tks:)
Yes, Jason's ex QX is a beast!:eek:
Yes, 2 cores is the best way for Aqua, '01, '03 and '05 but in Vista I've some problems of low cpu performance with only 2 cores for unknown reasons:shrug:
In XP my QX is not stable as in Vista:confused::shrug:
@ Pegazus:
Try to set RAM 1:4 with strap @ 333
If you want PL @ 6 you must to set CL to 6.
I ran 6-6-6-21 PL 6 and Trrd 6.
1,59v NB and 2.15v on ram for absolute stability.
PLL @ 1,54, VTT @ 1,425.
CPU GTL:
-1
-1
+4
+4
@ Hiwa: Tks my friend:)
Will you ran your new QX or your golden E8500?
Pegazus
07-06-2008, 07:26 AM
Tks:)
Yes, Jason's ex QX is a beast!:eek:
Yes, 2 cores is the best way for Aqua, '01, '03 and '05 but in Vista I've some problems of low cpu performance with only 2 cores for unknown reasons:shrug:
In XP my QX is not stable as in Vista:confused::shrug:
@ Pegazus:
Try to set RAM 1:4 with strap @ 333
If you want PL @ 6 you must to set CL to 6.
I ran 6-6-6-21 PL 6 and Trrd 6.
1,59v NB and 2.15v on ram for absolute stability.
PLL @ 1,54, VTT @ 1,425.
GTL: -1
-1
+4
+4
Thank friend :D
I see something different is I never set GTL just set it to auto.
I will try it.
Thank again and Wait to see more amazing job from you :up:
gandalfone
07-06-2008, 09:11 AM
Wap!! 38.9k:clap:
Impressive
Nice job nachthy
ZillaPct
07-06-2008, 09:23 AM
Greeeat Work Giorgio.....:D:D
This is superb score.....:yepp:
for the QF OC Panel no problem send to me a board and I transform him:D:D
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 10:58 AM
Tks Claudio:)
@ Zilla: Tks Marco.
Ok, I will contact you for the mod:D
nachthymnen
07-06-2008, 11:36 AM
Looks very good my friend..
How did you like working with Vista, did it cause you any problems?
Tks my friend and sorry for my delayed answer:p:
Well I must to say that in Vista I'm totally stable @ 5820mhz with my setup:eek:
Simply unbelivable, impossible for me to have the same stability in XP:shrug:
Just, Vista is really slow:(
saaya
07-07-2008, 12:15 AM
hmmmm weird... did you try vista and xp without any drivers installed?
maybe its some driver causing this?
and did you try to disable onboard hardware like sound etc? maybe its causing problems?
nachthymnen
07-07-2008, 01:00 AM
hmmmm weird... did you try vista and xp without any drivers installed?
maybe its some driver causing this?
and did you try to disable onboard hardware like sound etc? maybe its causing problems?
Not try this saaya but belive me, in Vista my chip is 100% stable over 5.8ghz with 4 cores, in XP I can't close Aquamark @ 5.8ghz also with only 2 cores enabled:shrug:
I have try in XP with many services stopped but result don't change.
But I will test again for sure.:up:
Harshal
07-07-2008, 01:33 AM
Very Good numbers man!!!
Looking forward to some more from you :D
nachthymnen
07-07-2008, 01:42 AM
Very Good numbers man!!!
Looking forward to some more from you :D
Tks Harshal, in 2 weeks I hope to re-run '05 and '06 for some better scores:)
It will be nice to found 4 good WB for the cards:rolleyes:
Harshal
07-07-2008, 02:27 AM
:D Thought so.... Good luck man!! :up:
nachthymnen
07-07-2008, 10:47 PM
:D Thought so.... Good luck man!! :up:
Tks Harshal:)
Cards testing:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080708110904_109082.jpg
Next LN2 session with cards @ 905/990 for better scores:D
nachthymnen
07-08-2008, 02:46 PM
Cards @ 915/999 run pretty good with stock cooler and maybe is not to the limit:D
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080708234751_109807.jpg
It really doesn't scale that well, but good score though
nachthymnen
07-09-2008, 02:11 AM
Cards @ 920/1000:)
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080709110923_111835.jpg
Now the score start to be intresting for only 4.2ghz QX.
intel101
07-09-2008, 02:14 AM
try 450 x 13x multi ram 1:2 1800mhz 7-6-6-16 1T
with more fsb and higher ram mhz you should be in reach of 40K.
You have the cpu and card clocks to do it m8. ;)
nachthymnen
07-09-2008, 02:27 AM
try 450 x 13x multi ram 1:2 1800mhz 7-6-6-16 1T
with more fsb and higher ram mhz you should be in reach of 40K.
You have the cpu and card clocks to do it m8. ;)
Next time I will try:)
With NB under LN2 maybe:D
My CS is dead but the Kingston is really good indeed:up:
intel101
07-09-2008, 02:31 AM
you need ln2 on NB for 450 fsb
or is it the qx or black ops that can't do more fsb :confused:
nachthymnen
07-09-2008, 02:40 AM
you need ln2 on NB for 450 fsb
or is it the qx or black ops that can't do more fsb :confused:
Last time over 430x13 I had some problems:(
Maybe wrong settings on my memory or some wrong voltage:shrug:
QX has already bench @ 486x11.5 with Evo X48 in the hand of MM:up:
So the problem is not the QX.
I must to find soon the best settings for this awesome mainboard.
Not tested so mouch till now:(
intel101
07-09-2008, 02:50 AM
Last time over 430x13 I had some problems:(
Maybe wrong settings on my memory or some wrong voltage:shrug:
QX has already bench @ 486x11.5 with Evo X48 in the hand of MM:up:
So the problem is not the QX.
I must to find soon the best settings for this awesome mainboard.
Not tested so mouch till now:(
1900mhz CL7-6-6-16 1T / perf. lvl 6 or 7 / trfc 50 / trrd 4 / trtp 4 / tref 16383T
with my G.Skill D9GTS sticks.
nachthymnen
07-09-2008, 02:06 PM
1900mhz CL7-6-6-16 1T / perf. lvl 6 or 7 / trfc 50 / trrd 4 / trtp 4 / tref 16383T
with my G.Skill D9GTS sticks.
Nice sticks:up:
Voltages?
G H Z
07-09-2008, 02:17 PM
Great results giorgio, you gotta love it when you can call a 5635MHz quad 'low frequency' :toast: :D
Hidetaka
07-09-2008, 02:35 PM
Congratulations :D
Where did you get that benchtable?
nachthymnen
07-09-2008, 11:25 PM
Great results giorgio, you gotta love it when you can call a 5635MHz quad 'low frequency' :toast: :D
:D
Tks my friend:)
Yeah, with this golden chip also 5.7ghz is a low frequency:p:
I'm 100% sure to be able to close '05 @ 5850+mhz:eek:
In my last session I've made a "test run" @ 5.8ghz and immediately after @ 5824mhz without any problems:eek:
Next session with cards over 925/1000 for 39+k '05.
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080710111303_114384.jpg
@ Hidetaka: Tks:)
You can contact "Dimas" or search in google "Dimastech":up:
nachthymnen
07-13-2008, 07:54 AM
I really love these Asus Top Cards:D
116k '03 very easy with only 4,46Ghz QX and stock cooled cards:up:
Stock voltages on the cards.
Vista+Sp1 new install and no optimized.
930/1019
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080713165258_116045.jpg
Can't imagine the score with 5.8Ghz QX:p:
Maybe 126k?
intel101
07-14-2008, 02:23 PM
Nice sticks:up:
Voltages?
2.1v
nachthymnen
07-14-2008, 08:11 PM
2.1v
Good:)
(do not look @ the write on my screen, haha, some mistake when I've write the ram description:D)
Cards @ 940/1014 stock cooler: :eek::up: (22° room temp.)
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200807/20080714201308_116501.jpg