Post your Aquamark3d results here !

[Major]

I have no idea how good this is, I just downloaded Aquamark3d tonight and this is my first run. Just currious what everyone is getting ?

Edit: I'm 1st place with 60,037 !!!! my 15mins !! hehe http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=286234053

[BBThumper]

........42,750 in default test............

[Major]

alittle better second run

[piercedandtatto]

46,188 with a mild overclocked 9800, will max everything out and try it again some time this week!

[Major]

How about 3rd place ! hehe (no comp yet ! lol)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=272541651

[Ranger Loki]

I got 19,583 total :(

[Dexter]

I get 48,557 with the system in sig. 5th for AMD with a 9800Pro but then again there ain;t many scores online yet.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=274264409

[Swiftdeathz]

46,000 or so link in sig

[b0bd0le]

i got 39k with a 9700np @ 340ish core and 270ish for mem

and my barton @ 2.1 with 200fsb

[Major]

How about 2nd place ! hehe

59,743

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=282901763

[Major]

My 15mins !!!!

[JeffPH]

congrats bro and i thot u never benched 3d !! :)

Way to go now aim for the 1st place

[mkleingeld]

Hey, how do I see the ORB (ARC)? I can only see my projects, not the rest can anybody give me a link?

[Major]

How about 1st place ! lol

60,037

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=286234053

hurry !!! It wont last long !

[eva2000]

someone reported they're getting higher aquamark scores with HT disabled for P4s ???

[Major]

I got a significantly higher score with HT ENABLED, by about 2000 points !

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by mkleingeld
Hey, how do I see the ORB (ARC)? I can only see my projects, not the rest can anybody give me a link?

Go to your score page and there is a Compare link on the right hand side, click on that and then do a search. It compares to your card but works more or less like 3dmark

I am top FX 5200U card, even beating the 51.75 driver folk. Not too much competition yet though in that class as I am running on an AthlonXP 1.6Ghz, since my Canterwood died, and the card is not fully overclocked. Bet the GF4 ti class is pretty hot, will have a go at that later.


Regards

Andy

[JeffPH]

OMG Major congrats lol :) I see u enjoying your bench :)

[zakelwe]

If I compare my FX 5200U to all cards I am on page 292 ! I don't think I have ever been so low :D

I'm wedged between a GF3 ti and a Radeon 9000 . Golly.

Regards

Andy

[Major]

I reworked my vapchill on the R9800pro this weekend and got temps looking good. I've got my GPU cranked up now. Tomorrow I'm going to increse the Vgpu alittle bit and should be able to hit 550mhz + on the core. Ram still stinks on my board though, might play with those voltages too tomorrow (but I'm scared ! lol)

[phil stanbridge]

I got 55k somink. I was in first place until all you yanks came online :p:

[mkleingeld]

Originally posted by zakelwe
Go to your score page and there is a Compare link on the right hand side, click on that and then do a search. It compares to your card but works more or less like 3dmark


Thanx, why didn't I see that myself? :)
I did a quick bench yesterday and got close to 46000 at very conservative daily settings. But now I can see the top 9700 is 51500, which should be close to reachable. Unfortunately I don't have an HT proc :(

Edit: major, why publish all your runs? You push everbody down 5 places :)

[Major]

I don't have all of my runs published, only my top 3. Should I remove the 2nd and 3rd ?

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by Major Slaughter
I don't have all of my runs published, only my top 3. Should I remove the 2nd and 3rd ?

Yeah, coz that might get me slightly higher on page 292 ! :D

LOL ...

Regards

Andy

[Major]

Ok I'm sorry, I was wrong....Still had several results being published. I've removed all but my top score !! hehe

Tomorrow 62k ! :D

[DarKcyde]

Originally posted by Major Slaughter
(but I'm scared ! lol)

says the guy running a vapochill on his video card :rolleyes:

[eva2000]

latest score - can't wait to see what i get with my prommy :)

P4 2.4C @ 3400mhz with MCX4000 + 120x38mm Delta 190cfm fan :D
P4C800-E
2x 256MB OCZ PC3700 Gold @ 226mhz 2337-8 15.8usec
ATI 9800NP @459/684

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=295799764
AquaMark Score: 52563
AquaMark CPU Score: 11297
AquaMark GFX Score: 6852
Average FramesPS: 52.563
Average TrianglesPS: 15822 K
Average PixelPS:

[zakelwe]

The GF3's are faster at running this bench than the 5200U :eek:

And not by a short head either ...

LOL

Regards

Andy

[kingassasin]

Congrats major slaughter, hehe I was there for a min anyway. That things alot of fun. Pretty neat little bench. Guess I got to work on it a litttle. Goodjob

[Major]

Hey, neither of us will be anywhere near the top page once Opp, Macci, DJ, Fugger, or the rest of them download and run this bench !!

Atleast we got our names in lights for a short while !

[kingassasin]

Yea, I agree. but I guess we had our 15mins. goodluck

[Major]

Hey Jason ! Yea I saw your results up there, looking good my friend !!

I've got alittle work to do on my benching rig, but I'm hopeing to hit 8k and 24k this week. I've got the cooling right now, just need some time. I've had the R9800pro up to 542 so far and thats without increasing the Vgpu any.

[Major]

Yea noticed that aquamark will let you clock pretty high. The bigest thing holding me back on doing some benching is my HD is loaded with some BS. I need to reformat and install a fresh copy of XP to run some serious benches.

[zakelwe]

Nice video card clocks Jason, I assume you got the temps sorted out, what LOD are you running ?

Is your GF 4600 still in existence or did it RIP ? I think you;d have some fun in that class, maybe against gabbrox ?

I've noticed something interesting about the GFX score in that it is still related to how fast the system is. I am running my GF4 at 338/675 and yet my video card score is less than people running lower clocks, ie they get up to 4000 and I am 3195. I think this is because FSB and chipset speed in general helps the video card scores and also the cpu scores.

The actual score of course is just dependent on framerate, ie fps x 1000, but it does show that the bench is cpu limited to some extent, unlike 3dmark03 which is almost all gpu apart from Gt1.

I am running on the worlds slowest chipset, AMD 760X dual at 140FSB and am struggling with 338/675 speeds to be on page 7 with 23.5k when top spot is running 320/716 at 32k ! ..

:rolleyes:

Regards
Andy

[Narbo]

I think after a bit of fooling I got up to around 39500 or so which was in the top 10 for cards listed as 9500s and somewhere around 500th overall. You are right that this bench will take more clock then say 3dmark 2003, I can only run 3dmark2003 at 350/313 core/mem without getting texture errors while in aquamark I had the core almost up to 370 with no errors. Could go for more I guess but the guy in first for 9500s has something like 50K and there is no way I will be about to touch that with stock cooling.

[Colin]

Man I really need a faster processor...

59679 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=219718932) is the best for me so far...

[GRexer]

Nice new benching program that i can see, too bad i'm back on dialup now and have to wait a week more to join in the fun, bet that by that time, the compare links will start pilling up ;)

[hedge]

LOL. It says that your computer will be able to run current games like Aquanox 2:Revelation or such. I just that at that becuase the only good thing that ever came out of aquanox was this aquamark. They made it when the geforce 3 came out to show it new technology.

[wrxsti]

Bah, I got 42,949. Wish my mem would clock higher then 302 :(

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=343977320

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by Colin
Man I really need a faster processor...

59679 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=219718932) is the best for me so far...

Nice to see you back again Colin.

The usual suspects keep rising to the top :)

Of course the " A " team seems to be thinking about it .. but whilst the cats are away the B team will play.

Colin, Major, King Assassin, Jason5750, all sticking in very good scores.

It looks like Futuremark might have some competition at last now another company has copied them and provided something the market wants. Good for us consumers. And it loads up and runs quicker .. :)

Regards

Andy

[LikwidKool]

I am really liking this bench. Maybe the 3DMark replacement??

Well here is my score. Not very good, but the VC is at default clocks and sliders. Nothing tweaked.

39,363
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=259849740

hehe I am #952 overall!!

[LikwidKool]

here is a little better, Sliders set to performance, and a very slight OC.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=385787011
43,307

[eva2000]

yay #24 on the ARC for 9800 series

9800NP @ 459/716 = 54,469
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=383355771

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/asus/p4c800e_results/2.4C_2/corsair/xms3500c2/2x512/190cfm/aquamark_rank/24th_small.jpg

[macci]

Hmm looks like I just found me a new bench :D

Just tested it on my gamin rig (9800SE AIW@9800Pro AIW, 2.4C) and got a score of 43.8k (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=385270140)

[wrxsti]

I got 43,319. Then I hit submit and BAM, froze :( :D

Oh well, 43,066 here (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=390417863)

[Kunaak]

how are people cheating, and forcing off the 4 times aniostropic filtering in the default test?

I see like 5-6 tests that advertise that right in there description...

[wrxsti]

I dont see anyone with the AF off. The AA is off, sure thats not what ur looking at?

[kanedazan]

35600, with a Radeon 9800 at defaut speed , xp2100@2100mhz...Seems to be a long way to reach 50k o_O

[zakelwe]

Not bad Jason, but you'll get stampeded by a herd of Intel boys before you know it, unless you go 64 bit :)

It puzzles me why you have a great video card then put it with a cpu that couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding :p: You remind me of my grandma's computer buying problems ...

:D

heh heh.

Regards
Andy

[Kunaak]

Originally posted by wrxsti
I dont see anyone with the AF off. The AA is off, sure thats not what ur looking at?

oh no, I mean people are bragging that they can run the benchmark with a setting inside some programs like rivatuner or something that Forces Aniostropic filtering off.
so while you are running the default benchmark, the benchmark thinks your card can't run AF, and then you get an instant 5-6,000 point boost.
it was in the results browser of ARC that people were saying this in thier headlines, and something is definatly fishy, cause the results are extremely high.
PC's running 30% slower then mine in both CPU score and GFX scores, are getting thousands more then me, and they bragg about forcing the AF off.

[Zeus]

Only got 22431 with my GF4 ti 4200 :(
Haven't compared yet.

[Kunaak]

I assume I am am "K" ? ;)

I will have another r9800 pro here tommorow, but the thing is...

if this cheat becomes more common, then all it would take is a cheater with a 4 ghz PC, and high end card to make a score you couldn't honestly touch :(

[STEvil]

I pulled 41,562 at my everyday running speeds. 2300mhz, 430/345 on lowly KT333 @ 192mhz FSB 8-)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=431168582

[Zeus]

Damn! I could easily take the no1 spot for AMD/GF4 ti but for some strange reason i get very low GFX score, my CPU score is way higher than the current no1.
What's wrong?

[Major]

Originally posted by MickeyMouse
yes 58k and the untouchable elite vc score of 8.4k all wiht a small 2600mhz cpu ;)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=412419161

I need some P4 4ghz+HT power ;)



I like it sorted by top overal score better Jason ! :D (but Im in 2nd now :( )

[Major]

Originally posted by macci
Hmm looks like I just found me a new bench :D

Just tested it on my gamin rig (9800SE AIW@9800Pro AIW, 2.4C) and got a score of 43.8k (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=385270140)

Macci you should let us little guys have fun with it for awhile before you break 80k with it !!! :D

[Gamer67]

*in steps a little man*


62,371 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=440002329)

P4C-800e deluxe
259fsb 1;1 turbo, 2.5,3,3,8 pat on (ocz pc3700gold)

172w tec on 5900u


My limit ATM... locks up on me after 260 fsb :rolleyes:

[Major]

Congrats gamer!!! :toast:

You too can enjoy 15mins !!!

Seriously thats a good score, I think I might have to try 1:1 and my OCZ Gold 3700 out to see if it would make a difference. But the FX 5900 just OC's so damn high !!!!

[Zeus]

This is freakin'me out!
I have the no 10 spot for overall AMD CPU test but my GFX score simply sucks!!
I have 9188 for CPU but only 2589 for GFX, i see ppl with much lower clocked Gf 4 ti cards that get better GFX score's than me. :(
I tried different drivers but to no avail, what's the secret of gettin good GFX scores? :confused:
I just can't take the No1 spot for AMD/ GF4 ti4200 because of my lousy GFX score.
My CPU score is waaay higher than the current no 1 AMD/GF 4ti!!

[Niven]

Im having major problems as well.
I see you Athlon guys getting 9000+ cpu score @ 2400mhz.
Im getting 4500 @ 2200mhz, somethings definately not good.

Has anyone got any ideas, or does this benchmark really suck?

[faruquehabib]

43, 789...when my slk900a comes in, that cpu score will go up. im lookin for 50k for the xtreme team

[kingassasin]

Your right slaughter, I need my geil 4200 back I just sent back. Too slow in 3d01 & 03, but I think this bench likes the bandwidth much more than it doesn't like the relaxed timings.

Jason, you need some p4 powa. Course, you've heard that from me before. hehe

[STEvil]

I got 7k cpu @ 2300mhz... sounds like something isnt set right, Niven?

[STEvil]

12x192
Single channel (Epox 8K3A+)
2-6-2-2-1T 4 bank Fast R/W.

Once I put in the 8RDA+ they'll go up a bit 8-)

[retrospooty]

54301 for me :D

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=502508146

[retrospooty]

tx... I gotta update my sig though, I am now at 295 mhz bus, but 3:2 ram divider because my wonderful Max3 just hates 5:4 :(

[Major]

retrospooty have you tried your ram set to 3 on Cas to Ras ?? Known issue with Corsair and 865/875 chipset. I think I remember talking with you about it but not sure. Its worth a try if you haven't already. My XMS3500 will not pass memtest at anything much over 200mhz with Cas to Ras at 2.

[macci]

w00t I broke 50k (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=512551102) :D

#1 under 3GHz P4.. with stock All In Wonder card ;)

this is nice little bench indeed :)

[Major]

I like it too macci, its quick and I suffer from attention deficit disorder I guess ! lol

[STEvil]

This bench absolutely LOVES memory bandwidth....

[Dagalidis]

Here is mine.....
With 2440 MHZ (244 x 10) and 480/930 my FX5900... :D
http://users.in.gr/dagalidis/assets/50k300.jpg
http://users.in.gr/dagalidis/assets/50k300details.jpg

And more to come.....

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by Zeus
This is freakin'me out!
I have the no 10 spot for overall AMD CPU test but my GFX score simply sucks!!
I have 9188 for CPU but only 2589 for GFX, i see ppl with much lower clocked Gf 4 ti cards that get better GFX score's than me. :(
I tried different drivers but to no avail, what's the secret of gettin good GFX scores? :confused:
I just can't take the No1 spot for AMD/ GF4 ti4200 because of my lousy GFX score.
My CPU score is waaay higher than the current no 1 AMD/GF 4ti!!

Post a link ?

Regards
Andy

[retrospooty]

Originally posted by Major Slaughter
retrospooty have you tried your ram set to 3 on Cas to Ras ?? Known issue with Corsair and 865/875 chipset. I think I remember talking with you about it but not sure. Its worth a try if you haven't already. My XMS3500 will not pass memtest at anything much over 200mhz with Cas to Ras at 2.

Yup. I tried it, even tried 3-4-4, as well as 2.5-3-3 . It just can't go (stable) over 270 at 5:4, no matter what the vdimm, or timings, or other settings under GAT are. (although in single channel both sticks can run at 300mhz 5:4 at 2-2-2-5 :eek: ) My Max2 went 283 at 5:4 at 2-2-2-5, so its a bummer I cant get as fast.

I have Corsair XMS3500 (bh5) that run great at 283mhz 5:4 2-2-2-5 on the MAX2 , but on the MAX3, they can't run the same speed, at 5:4 they max out at 270.

I could easily believe that I just have an unlucky board except...

Using the increased Vdimm of the Max3

at 1:1 I can now get 245mhz at 2-2-2-5 , with MAX2, i got 225 so the ram CAN go alot higher with the Max3

at 3:2 I can run stable at 295 mhz , with the MAX2 I got 290 max so the fsb CAN go alot higher with the Max3

So... at 1:1 and 3:2 my MAX3 is quite a bit faster, but its unstable at 5:4 ??? Which is where I need to be , given my RAM and CPU. :mad:

[phil stanbridge]

Retro, Isn't there a 5:4 bug with the Max3 that Abit are aware of. I'm sure they're looking into it, and there will be a fix addressed in a new bios.

[retrospooty]

Originally posted by phil stanbridge
Retro, Isn't there a 5:4 bug with the Max3 that Abit are aware of. I'm sure they're looking into it, and there will be a fix addressed in a new bios.

There is a 5:4 bug with the IC7 series with several memory chips, but mine ar bh-5, the one widely known to work well... And they DO work well at 283 5:4 2-2-2-5 on my Ic7G.

Are you saying you heard of a separate bug that ONLY effects the MAX3 ? I hope so, at least that means there is hope. :banana:

[eva2000]

10 seconds you serious ? my score at 54,469 took alot longer heh

[CarNabY]

http://space.virgilio.it/tizgugl/IMG/aqua%2061236.gif
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=552200406

2.4@3.965Mhz
9800 555/400
DDR Kingston 3500 3:2 2-5-2-2

:toast:

[eva2000]

curious why you top 10 or 20 folks don't list your systems in full in the description fields rather than just your name/nick ? trade secret or something ? :)

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by Kunaak
oh no, I mean people are bragging that they can run the benchmark with a setting inside some programs like rivatuner or something that Forces Aniostropic filtering off.
so while you are running the default benchmark, the benchmark thinks your card can't run AF, and then you get an instant 5-6,000 point boost.
it was in the results browser of ARC that people were saying this in thier headlines, and something is definatly fishy, cause the results are extremely high.
PC's running 30% slower then mine in both CPU score and GFX scores, are getting thousands more then me, and they bragg about forcing the AF off.

Hello Kunnak,

Thanks for pointing this out. I thought I'd test it and so used Rivatuner to control filtering. I ran the test beforehand at 325 / 633 for my GF4 and got 23 100, then used rivatuner to control the filtering and my score went up to 26500. So 3 000 points on 24 000 so about 13% increase.

This is not a problem when comapring between like cards as everyone can use it, but when comparing the top scores and people are using different cards then it becomes an issue.

I'll poke around a bit more. If you see my GF4 getting 65 000 points then you'll know I am making rapid progress doing my own nVidia style optimistations :D

Regards

Andy

[charlie]

Originally posted by eva2000
curious why you top 10 or 20 folks don't list your systems in full in the description fields rather than just your name/nick ? trade secret or something ? :)

I think they're just too lazy to type it all in there...
:p:

[eva2000]

Originally posted by charlie
I think they're just too lazy to type it all in there...
:p: type it in a text file and copy and paste when needed :)

[daddy_fizz]

am i doing something wrong? i have my 3.0C running at 3.6 (240x15) and have my 9800 pro at 455/380 and can barely break 20,000...???

HT is enabled...but it shouldn't make that big of a difference...

~Fizz

[Zeus]

Originally posted by zakelwe
Post a link ?

Regards
Andy

Oh, sorry, bragging and no proof! :D

Here you go:

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=469227149 ;)

[macci]

daddy_fizz, have you installed intel chipset drivers? :)

[daddy_fizz]

i did it not too long ago but i'll redown it and try it again

thanks for the suggestion macci

~Fizz

[Major]

Originally posted by eva2000
curious why you top 10 or 20 folks don't list your systems in full in the description fields rather than just your name/nick ? trade secret or something ? :)

The Bench details system info, all except mb type

[macci]

57495 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=596127635)
3.2@3976 (watercooled)
R9800Pro @481/389 (stock cooling on card)
HyperX PC3000 @ 1:1 2-2-2-5

funny thing is that it won't give me GFX or CPU scores at all??
I found that using setfsb or clockgen seems to cause this. Also its wierd that I can boot at say 200FSB set it to 210fsb via clockgen and it will still give those CPU and GFX scores..BUT if I set it to say 240 (booted up at 200) it wont give the scores anymore? Whats up with that?

[Major]

61,473 :D 2nd place (for the next 15mins ! lol)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=623759033

[Major]

Ok Gamer67 !!! whats your secret ??? :D

I can't get past 61,500 no matter what I try.

Tomorrow fresh install ! maybe thats what it will take ?

[TribesMan]

I'am no.1 in R9100 & R8500 at the moment:

AquaMark Score: 20657
CPU: 7799
GFX: 2379

20657 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=575826825)

I'am waiting for new DC RAM at the moment. And then...

[Major]

Congrats TribesMan !! :toast: I hope your new ram helps keep you on top ! ;)

I finally broke through to 61,800 but my room is soo hot I'll have to continue tomorrow

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=651236414

[xigfrid]

I don't get it ...


My setup : barton 2500+@2.6Ghz + ATI9500Pro+win2K3

Aquamark score : 19748
CPU: 4714 <=== find it like a "athlon tm XP" ??
GFX: 2511

but TribesMan has : barton@2.6Ghz + winXP
AquaMark Score: 20657
CPU: 7799 <== find it like a "athlon tm"
GFX: 2379


I ll try some register trick to put in windows the AMD athlon tm ::D but i don't like this aquamark for that :(

EDIT : forgot the link :
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=660597675

[TribesMan]

@ xigfrid

I don't have Barton CPU, my is ordinary Athlon XP 2000+ @ 2540MHz, with barton at these frequencies CPU score would be around 10k.

It looks like you have some sirious problems... Check your drivers, DirectX version... I don't think it is an hardware problem.

[thetruememphis]

46201 with a 9700pro (see sig for rest of details) not to much of an overclock YET.

amd@2455 10.5x233

number 8 in amd xp and 9700

[Zeus]

Originally posted by TribesMan
@ xigfrid

I don't have Barton CPU, my is ordinary Athlon XP 2000+ @ 2540MHz, with barton at these frequencies CPU score would be around 10k.

It looks like you have some sirious problems... Check your drivers, DirectX version... I don't think it is an hardware problem.

Erm, i don't think you'll get 10K with a barton @ 2540, look at my CPU score, this is 228x11.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=576815470

Still 9.2K is nice for a AMD aircooled setup i'd say! ;)

[xigfrid]

Originally posted by Zeus
Erm, i don't think you'll get 10K with a barton @ 2540, look at my CPU score, this is 228x11.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=576815470

Still 9.2K is nice for a AMD aircooled setup i'd say! ;)


Oh well ... here is my 11x232 (2550Mhz) :mad:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=680155490
cpu:4800
GFX:2502
total bad4ss : 19855

compared to my 12.5x209 (2610Mhz)
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=660597675
cpu:4714
GFX:2511
total: 19748

guess what ? I hate aquamark3 !!!!

:mad:

forgot to say,
DDRAM timings 2-2-2-11 (cpu interface enable, DX9a, cata3.4, etc ...)

[wrxsti]

Yeah, you definately have some major problems lol.

[Gamer67]

Originally posted by Major Slaughter
Ok Gamer67 !!! whats your secret ??? :D

I can't get past 61,500 no matter what I try.

Tomorrow fresh install ! maybe thats what it will take ?

I think it is purely down to the clock speeds of the diferent cards m8, CPU wise we are close ;)

You might not like to hear this but, the only thing holding me and Jason back from posting higher is this damn 0c issue with the 5900u :rolleyes:

[xigfrid]

Originally posted by MickeyMouse
are you in sync m8?? lol reformat and install your os and software thats a messed up setup

let me think : I've just reformat yesterday, all drivers has been installed correctly ... prolly something i didn't get up to now... btw thanx for the help.

I won't know whats the matter, keeping on 3Dmark :P


EDIT / yeah of course synchro , dual channel with 2* 512 OCZ PC3500 EL that can do 240Mhz@2-2-2-11@ 3.2V pime stable

[eva2000]

35,512

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=695544105

AquaMark Score: 35512
AquaMark CPU Score: 11521
AquaMark GFX Score: 4197
Average FramesPS: 35.512
Average TrianglesPS: 10689 K

#1 128MB 9600PRO VIVO - P4 system on ARC :cool:
#6 128MB 9600PRO VIVO - overall :D

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/asus/p4c800e_results/2.4C_3m/corsair/xms3500c2/2x512/190cfm/aquamark_rank/9600pro_vivo_P4_rank1.jpg

======================
======================

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/asus/p4c800e_results/2.4C_3m/corsair/xms3500c2/2x512/190cfm/aquamark_rank/9600pro_vivo_6_rank.jpg

seems that 4 of the 5 scores above mine are all Medion 9600TX rebadged 9500PROs ???

[Zeus]

Originally posted by xigfrid
let me think : I've just reformat yesterday, all drivers has been installed correctly ... prolly something i didn't get up to now... btw thanx for the help.

I won't know whats the matter, keeping on 3Dmark :P


EDIT / yeah of course synchro , dual channel with 2* 512 OCZ PC3500 EL that can do 240Mhz@2-2-2-11@ 3.2V pime stable

Don't worry to much about this benchmark, i can't seem to get a decent GFX score, no matter what i do.
I see ppl with the same videocard at much lower clocks getting much better scores than i get! :confused:
My CPU score on the other hand looks nice but doesn't seem to bump the overall score up that much. :(

[CarNabY]

Up ;)
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=702200147
61655
2.4@4023 1.6v :)

335*12 Nb stock cooling :)

DDR 3:2 2-5-2-2 223Mhz :( I need DDR for 5:4.......

9800 558/405 grrr I do not succeed to go up beyond the 405Mhz
Gpu 1.82v and Mem 3.3v...I have tried increasing the voltage 3.7v but it does not change nothing



x Major.
Which voltages use with yours 9800?

thanks

[Major]

Ok weird thing happend today ! reformated and put a fresh clean install of XP, drivers, and only the benching programs I need. The machine if flying, I mean it "feels" twice as fast. I'm thinking oh yea baby !! let the benching begin. But when I go to OC my R9800pro, it wont OC as well now ??? WTH happend ??

I had it OCed where it would pass Auqamark3d at 551/418 now it will only pass it at 546/416 any ideas as to why or what ?? Could it be the overhead with the previous install (had all sorts of crap on it) actually made it possible to obtain a higher stable OC on my video card ?

CarNabY, I just bumped them up a tiny bit yesturday, about .10v on all but Vref and increased it .05v.

(I could have Vddr and Vddq reversed, I always get confused about them)

Vgpu = 1.98v
Vddr = 3.3v
Vddq = 3.0v
Vref = 1.6v (this one is scary !)

Gamer67 and Jason, I hope they never fix the dirvers for your FX cards !!!!! :D ;)

[saaya]

20K with 8500 default and 9x240dc

[Major]

Jason, I ran it up to 2.1v last night but I didn't gain anything just made the card freeze :D

I can run it at around 542 with zero artifact and without tearing, even at 547 the artifacts just are starting to show up. But I get a freeze at anything above 551. Upping the memory volts help alittle, I went from 396 to around 416 and can run at 404 without any tearing.

[Hobocrow]

Major S, Are you measuring the VDDQ under the card from the capacitor base or some easier/better place? :confused:

btw, great scores and o/c! :)

[Major]

Thanks Hobocrow

I measure Vddq between the capacitor and the choke coil at the front bottom right of the mb its the last one in a row of three.

[Hobocrow]

Thanks Major S...I'll check that measuring point out. I used Macci's guide on my last R9800 and was too lazy to do a lead from the cap on the bottom of the card...so I always did that one from the "feel of it" :p: Soon killed that card!

Vref=1.6v....:eek: ;)

[macci]

Seems that the 'Max FPS' result is a good indicator of pure bandwidth/CPU speed. Atleast it seems so: the higher the CPU and the faster the mem subsystem (timings, ram speed, fsb etc) the higher the max FPS seems to be. Card speed will make a difference on this obviously but bandwidth seems to be more important. I noticed that enabling HT would give a clear improvement on this too.

Some examples:

Major (4009MHz, 547/416) => 181FPS
bmg (4246MHz, 527/398) =>181FPS
KingAssasin (3965MHz, 533/416) => 173FPS

oh and here's mine too ;)
3976MHz (16x248 1:1) (481/389 => 182FPS

[STEvil]

Someone needs to run this on an AMD @ 3.1ghz with an nF2 @ 255mhz DC 2-2-2-5/6/7/11 amd R9800 Pro or GFFX 5900.. heh.

[Zeus]

Originally posted by STEvil
Someone needs to run this on an AMD @ 3.1ghz with an nF2 @ 255mhz DC 2-2-2-5/6/7/11 amd R9800 Pro or GFFX 5900.. heh.

Never seen anyone doing 255 DC 2-2-2-5 on an NF7 with decent multi's but it sure is nice to dream about it!! ;)

[STEvil]

Time to LN2 us an nF2 board! 8-)

[Pejsen]

Hey Major Slaughter

in the voltmod pic u posted, i can see the Vgpu mod is done a little different from the others i have seen, or is it just me?

i've think that i have seen some doing it like on the R9700PRO's u know tho one with 2 SMD-grabbers the "big" chip called
SC1175CSW
0205
G27729A

Am i correct or just mistaken?

Thanks

[macci]

both mods are doing the same thing. The one Major posted has just different solderin points (both of those solderpads in the pic are connected to the pins of SC1175).

Did some testin.. got the clocks to about the right level but the score kinda sucks :D
62441 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=777121575)

Any good tweaks for this bench?

[wrxsti]

Yeah, score is just "ok" :)

[Major]

Originally posted by Pejsen
Hey Major Slaughter

in the voltmod pic u posted, i can see the Vgpu mod is done a little different from the others i have seen, or is it just me?

i've think that i have seen some doing it like on the R9700PRO's u know tho one with 2 SMD-grabbers the "big" chip called
SC1175CSW
0205
G27729A

Am i correct or just mistaken?

Thanks

Yea Pejsen its the same mod, just different location of soldier points.


Did some testin.. got the clocks to about the right level but the score kinda sucks

Macci go back to benching 3mdark !!!!!! :D Please ! ;)

[macci]

Macci go back to benching 3mdark !!!!!! Please !
:D well actually I did but it locked up in nature.. was doing a 26.1-26.2k Mark2001 run (@4050MHz, 22640 without nature..). oh well gotta figure out whats up with the aqwamark3 score - it SHOULD be higher :D

[charlie]

Aquamark3...don't really like it...
It takes REALLY long to run...not good for bleeding edge cooling. So I ran it on my gaming rig, 3.2gHz, R9700 Pro @ 385/345, and it came up with 16,800pts...less than the 3dMark 01 score...lol.
I'm sure I'm just not use to it as I've only run it 2x...will play more this weekend.
C

[saaya]

Originally posted by Zeus
Never seen anyone doing 255 DC 2-2-2-5 on an NF7 with decent multi's but it sure is nice to dream about it!! ;)

i can bench @255dc with my a7n8x but my memory wont run cl2 above 245dc even with 3.6v :(

[wrxsti]

Originally posted by charlie
Aquamark3...don't really like it...
It takes REALLY long to run...not good for bleeding edge cooling. So I ran it on my gaming rig, 3.2gHz, R9700 Pro @ 385/345, and it came up with 16,800pts...less than the 3dMark 01 score...lol.
I'm sure I'm just not use to it as I've only run it 2x...will play more this weekend.
C

You have a problem then. Should score over 45k

[daddy_fizz]

i have the same problem

i am running my 3.0 at 3.6 and my 9800 pro at 450/380 and i only get 20000 max... some wierd qwirk...

~Fizz

[Major]

Guys this Bench is all about memory bandwidth (and gpu OC !) see if you can get your memory bandwith up and your scores will improve significantly.

[Major]

Oh yea Jason !!! a 3.2c is what I need ! good luck buddy that should rock !

[bmg]

For overall aquamark score macci's moved into the #1 spot (no surprise there!). IIRC, Major's #3 and I'm #5. I'm still #1 for cpu score and major is #2, but the difference is only about 0.1%. However, for some reason macci has no separate cpu or graphics scores listed, otherwise he'd clearly be #1 cpu.

[Major]

Yea he said when you use setfsb or clockgen it doesn't recongnize the the cpu socre ?

[Major]

I've hit a wall, got to make a major change to get past my high score. Either new chip, new mem, or different video card !

[STEvil]

Mickey - Try running the TEC @ 5v or so maybe?

[CarNabY]

Originally posted by macci
Seems that the 'Max FPS' result is a good indicator of pure bandwidth/CPU speed. Atleast it seems so: the higher the CPU and the faster the mem subsystem (timings, ram speed, fsb etc) the higher the max FPS seems to be. Card speed will make a difference on this obviously but bandwidth seems to be more important. I noticed that enabling HT would give a clear improvement on this too.

Some examples:

Major (4009MHz, 547/416) => 181FPS
bmg (4246MHz, 527/398) =>181FPS
KingAssasin (3965MHz, 533/416) => 173FPS

oh and here's mine too ;)
3976MHz (16x248 1:1) (481/389 => 182FPS

Ok Macci
For that I cause I have a low score?

4023Mhz,fsb 335Mhz,558/405 = > 178FPS :confused:
Bad version bios? (1008)
3:2 with DDR 223Mhz 2-5-2-2 ??
I do not understand the reason of the low score :mad:

[CarNabY]

Originally posted by Major Slaughter

Macci go back to benching 3mdark !!!!!! :D Please ! ;)

:D :D

[macci]

carnaby, I was testing with 1008 yesterday too and my max fps took quite a hit (went below 180). not sure if it was just the bios or some bios setting I had forgot but anyways once I put 1007.12 back in I hit 185+ again :)
so might be a good idea to test with some other bios.

the current Mark2001 score is done with 1008 thou so it can't be that bad ;)

[CarNabY]

Macci thanks... I try 1007..
Yours radeon is full mod?


Compliments... remains always the number one :toast:

[macci]

Thanks :) and Radeon is fully modded (no Vref mod thou)

And I think I figured aqwamark out :)

64k (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=825109624) (watercooled CPU) :)

[CarNabY]

:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
Macci!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrr go back to benching 3DMark!! :slash:

590/420 !!! Dry ice?

[macci]

64809 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=826932010)
16x252 1:1 2-2-2-5 (waterchiller -5C)
R9800 @590/423 (dryice)

[Major]

U da man macci ! :toast:

Ok now you can slow down and let everyone catch up !!!!! (mainly me !) :D

[G H Z]

Chasing Macci

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=877019780 , but I can't really see him;)

G H Z

[saaya]

do you think you can get a 600 core run? :D

[CarNabY]

Up :p:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=964216867

[kromosto]

i ot a 48k score but wont post a link here untill i got 50k lol

[kromosto]

waow macci "Maximal Triangles per Second: 47492422" this is great as if gpu can play 90 million of them per sec then quality of the graphics will be same as real life i think you have to most near card to that barrier

[mkleingeld]

Guys, could you have a look at the top 3 entries for r9700 (r300) cards? They look very fake to me. It pisses me off as otherwise I'd be on 11 and almost on the top page for r9700 cards.

1 AquaMark Score: 59807 (CPU: 0, GFX: 0) FPS: 59.81 TPS: 18004 K Detail Comparison
CPU: Pentium(R) 4 processor CR: 4579 MHz SRAM: 511 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 CM: 263 / 263 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: pro75_2000, 2003-09-19, "Benchmark 2003-09-19 10-48-37"

#2 AquaMark Score: 58239 (CPU: 0, GFX: 0) FPS: 58.24 TPS: 17532 K Detail Comparison
CPU: Pentium(R) 4 processor CR: 4463 MHz SRAM: 511 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 CM: 263 / 263 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: pro75_2000, 2003-09-18, "Benchmark 2003-09-18 11-05-29"

#3 AquaMark Score: 52463 (CPU: 0, GFX: 0) FPS: 52.46 TPS: 15793 K Detail Comparison
CPU: Pentium(R) 4 processor CR: 4031 MHz SRAM: 511 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 CM: 263 / 263 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: pro75_2000, 2003-09-18, "Benchmark 2003-09-17 23-55-43"


Ok, the 3rd might be real.

[macci]

all clear fakes.. :/

[mkleingeld]

Thanx for that. So I know I should be 11th really :-)
Just need better contact on the promi head with this MAX3 that I just got 2 days so I can go for the top page (in my class)

[mkleingeld]

Ok, just to hopefully put some life back into this thread :)

Just put my new 2.8c in and did some testing. I think there is more to come, otherwise I'll not be very happy. Just 3.8ghz zo far, beyond that I have trouble with spontaneous freezes.

But I did manage the number one 9700 score that is not fake:

53430

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1377191847

[STEvil]

Update: 44k @ 2405mhz 8-)

[BiG]

55091p with an water/pelt cooled Sapphire 9700 np.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1412407185

[DjTonic]

My newest Aquamark 3 project with my system:D I'm so happy with new score. I have Barton 2500+ oc'ed to 2012 Mhz. Graphics card is Leadtek GF4 Ti 4200 128DDR oc'ed to 327/675 :p: ;) 31,575 Marks (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1419346363) ;) Comments please :P

[xgman]

51,964 with a small o/c of a 5900U and all stock settings otherwise on a SK8N/FX51. det 52.13's.

[Boogotop]

in my sig

[DjTonic]

:eek: Good score :D

[leinad78]

p4 2,4BC1@2,988 9700pro @392/332

gfx 5775
cpu 7669
41965

is that ok?

[Kunaak]

where do you get the 52.13 driver?

[Soulburner]

Score is in sig.

I used 51.75, tried 52.13 and score was identical but was brighter like it should be and not dark like the previous drivers. It looked like the Radeon cards.

[Major]

Originally posted by Kunaak
where do you get the 52.13 driver?

I beleive they are available at www.guru3d.com

[Kunaak]

highest 5900 non ultra scores on 3dmark 2001se, 3dmark2003, aquamark3.

although 2003 was given to me cause Mickeymouse there removed his top score, haha ;)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1559270500

[charlie]

Nice Kunaak,
The "triple crown" !!!
C

[Major]

Excellent :toast:

Did the 52.13 drivers help ??

How do you like the 5900 so far ??

[Kunaak]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1559836899

a hundred or so points away from 60K, now at spot number 15 ;)
not bad for a unmodded 250 dollar card :)

the 5213 didn't really make a difference on either 3dmark2003 or aquamark, the score on aquamark was identical, and the score on 2003 was only 10 points better...
maybe I am missing something?

the 5900 is a fun card, it really hasn't let me down yet.
my experiences with the 5900 ultra were far from what I could call fun, but this card is a different story all together, it just seems to get better and better, and has none of the issues I had with the 5900 ultra.
well worth the effort for a slightly "slower" card, thats more reliable.

well, shooting for 60k now, wish me luck...

[Kunaak]

60,001

ok, thats just tooooooooo damn close, haha, it's definatly time to go to bed, luck is just hanging around about to give me the finger. when a score is that close and you still break your goal it's definatly time to call it a night and be happy :)

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1560017204

1 point, above 60k....
thats insane.

[Major]

I Knew you could do it !

It just goes to show how dependent Aquamark3 is on memory bandwidth.

[mkleingeld]

Originally posted by BiG
55091p with an water/pelt cooled Sapphire 9700 np.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1412407185

Ok, a bit of a late reply to that but seems like I have work to do, I'm the one right below you in the R9700 catagory :)

[bigballaga]

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1499303017

i got a pretty nice CPU score i must say, but my bottleneck without a doubt is the gpu. I have a ti4400 which is holding me back from blowing at least 58-59k !!!

[Soulburner]

bigballaga, you need to use different drivers for that benchmark, the 45.23s run it like ass. Try 52.13.

[CarNabY]

Up :banana:
62371
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1624211298

[Soltani]

My score is 55633 http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=138199131

[Tom Holck]

Radeon XT at 559/448

64.708 :D

Thats top 5.

[Tom Holck]

Originally posted by MickeyMouse
YOM I see your having some fun there hu?? ;) now imagine that rig of yours wiht a nice shinny P4EE at same clocks ;)

Yes, that will be great.

My FX51/SK8V/CorsairRE3200/voltmodded finich next week,
then I go for 3DMark2001:D

just passed Macci

now

64985

:toast:

[Soltani]

Originally posted by Tom Holck
Yes, that will be great.

My FX51/SK8V/CorsairRE3200/voltmodded finich next week,
then I go for 3DMark2001:D

just passed Macci

now

64985

:toast:

Haha Tom Holck you are passing them all, and going straight for the first place:toast:

[xgman]

still got a ways to go. But, 5950 stock voltage on FX51 water.

[Tom Holck]

Now moving up.

P4@4306 Radeon XT set at 565/457 going


65.202 :D

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=205627172

[gabbax]

57765

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1010956680

[Tom Holck]

I think the Aqua is better with P4.

well done:toast: