PDA

View Full Version : L2 cache comparison roundup - E7200 vs E8500 plus QX9770 - lets take a look


PcCI2iminal
06-01-2008, 11:26 PM
Dont know if this has been posted, but here is a comparison between the L2 cache .


http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6715/45nmfotohr7.jpg

in some apps llike Cinebench,Wprime,etc the duals will see a performance penalty in comparison to a quad but is interesting to see the quad vs dual in single tasks like Pi,Pifast,etc.
Well, how does cache (3mb vs. 6mb vs. 2x6mb) affect the Core2 performance ?
lets take a look and enjoy :)

Core2 3.17GHz
E7200 @ 334x9.5 vs E8500 @ 334x9.5 vs QX9770 vs 334x9.5
Team Group DDR3 1600 @ 1333MHz Cas6 6-6-15 (see memset at Aquamark)
Asus P5E3 Premium 0402
9800GTX default clock
Forceware 175.16 high performance with no LOD

Aquamark fps
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8139/aquaim5.jpg

3D06 3dmarks
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/7697/3d06pg3.jpg

3D06 fps
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5371/3d06returntoproxyconiy6.jpg
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2228/3d06fireflyforestnc1.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4227/3d06cpu1redvalleyli8.jpg
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/1466/3d06cpu2redvalleylo1.jpg
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/6505/3d06canyonflightaf1.jpg
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2011/3d06deepfreezeae2.jpg

Cinebench
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2301/cinebench1cpupr7.jpg
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/3135/cinebenchxcpuse4.jpg
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/305/cinebenchmultiprocessorvd9.jpg

Cpumark
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/3456/cpumarkqo8.jpg

Pifast secs
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/1124/pifastfw2.jpg

Everest read MB/s
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/668/everestreadnr7.jpg

Everest latency ns
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/4436/latencygh1.jpg

Fritz Chess
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/1513/fritzchessbw5.jpg

Super Pi 1m secs
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/1234/superp1ok6.jpg

Winrar KB/s
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4674/winrarzk1.jpg

WPrime 32m secs
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/315/wprime32mzf6.jpg

WPrime 1024M secs
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/3787/wprime1024mut3.jpg

the screens
E7200
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3316/3d06jt0.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3d06jt0.jpg)http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7808/aqua176412wg4.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=aqua176412wg4.jpg)http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2391/cinebenchih8.th.jpg (http://img529.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cinebenchih8.jpg)http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/3221/pieverestwinrarop6.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pieverestwinrarop6.jpg)http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/4470/pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimfd9.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimfd9.jpg)

E8500
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9681/3d06th4.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3d06th4.jpg)http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5871/aqua198361gp6.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=aqua198361gp6.jpg)http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/581/cinebenchxk5.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cinebenchxk5.jpg)http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2460/pieverestwinrargx9.th.jpg (http://img529.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pieverestwinrargx9.jpg)http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/1058/pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimgt6.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimgt6.jpg)

QX9770
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9336/3d06hn6.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3d06hn6.jpg)http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/3889/aqua199785bt5.th.jpg (http://img529.imageshack.us/my.php?image=aqua199785bt5.jpg)http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/192/cinebenchjn1.th.jpg (http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cinebenchjn1.jpg)http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3936/pieverestwinrarfw0.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pieverestwinrarfw0.jpg)http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7393/pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimwq0.th.jpg (http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pifastcpumarkfrtizwprimwq0.jpg)

chinaguy
06-01-2008, 11:58 PM
Well a E7200 is on my shopping list for my HTPC. Looks like the extra cache doesn't make all that much difference for the extra $ for the E8500!

belial
06-02-2008, 12:40 AM
thx so much for this test, been looking for something like this

good to know that games almost don't take advantage from the extra cache

fng77
06-02-2008, 01:53 AM
Very interesting. Thank for your effort.

fiveprime
06-02-2008, 02:37 AM
Have you run any demo's of games? Whats the real world performance difference like?

CERO
06-02-2008, 03:43 AM
Nice comparison :up:, however would had like to see some comparsion in some Games if it was possible

PcCI2iminal
06-02-2008, 02:48 PM
thx guys
Crysis ,Call of Juarez DX10 & Company of Heroes will be tested soon

:)

philbrown23
06-02-2008, 03:02 PM
this is cool! it shows how much the cache actually does.

MomijiTMO
06-02-2008, 03:52 PM
Thanks for the review. I so want a E7200 [or a 7300 by the time I get around to buying it].

conzymaher
06-02-2008, 04:12 PM
Great comparison :)

But, Graphs that don't start at 0 are hard to interpret at a glance, this one for example:

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8139/aquaim5.jpg

I was like OMG WTF CACHE CAKES, then I realized the graph didnt start at 0 :)

shine121
06-02-2008, 05:27 PM
nice comparison,just realize the difference between L2 cache
E8500 just want i need

down8
06-02-2008, 05:56 PM
It would be nice if the graphs crossed at 0, so ppl could make a better judgment.

But, awesome information, nonetheless!

-bZj

STEvil
06-02-2008, 07:22 PM
Graphs at 0? Why, didnt you learn to read them in school?

If you cared to look at the scale used starting at 0 would make some really really poor graphs, hence why the numbers are included (graphs are just quick visual references to most anyone who knows how to use them anyways).

Solarfall
06-02-2008, 08:27 PM
excellent comparison PcCI2iminal.. i bet that alot of people will find this really helpful. :up:

WhiteFireDragon
06-02-2008, 08:43 PM
so the only reason the quad wins in most is because it has double number of cores instead of double the cache right?

Miwo
06-03-2008, 07:38 AM
Thank you for the writeup, lots of good info :) .
If its not too much to ask, do you think you could include some game benchmarks where you show MIN / MAX FPS?

You can buy an E8300 for $30 more than an E7200, I think the extra cache is worth it. You lose the 9.5x multiplyer, but i think 8.5x is fine if you can tweak your board well enough

conzymaher
06-03-2008, 08:36 AM
Graphs at 0? Why, didnt you learn to read them in school?

If you cared to look at the scale used starting at 0 would make some really really poor graphs, hence why the numbers are included (graphs are just quick visual references to most anyone who knows how to use them anyways).

I think you'll find graphs started at 0 in school, Graphs for advertising / marketing start elsewhere...

If the graph starts at 0 you can look at the bars or whatever and say "hmmm that one is about 10% faster." What use is a graph as a "visual reference" if it implies that the e8500 is twice as good as the e7200

Also stop being so :banana::banana::banana::banana:y, you were incorrect...

MadMan007
06-03-2008, 05:49 PM
It would be nice if the graphs crossed at 0, so ppl could make a better judgment.

But, awesome information, nonetheless!

-bZj

I agree, it's great to see a user comparison but the graphs skew the perception - 'marketing' vs 'real performance difference.' Scores as a percentage along with the absolute scores would give a more realistic impression.

systemviper
06-03-2008, 05:54 PM
I see all these people hawking the E6xxx, E4xxx and E2xxxx chips and they all are
asking for $100, + OR - $20 and i think to myself, i could get a.....

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Wolfdale 2.53GHz 3MB L2 Cache LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor

for $126 delivered..... and it makes me wonder.....
New or Old, Think I take the New....

Lestat
06-03-2008, 06:55 PM
dont make your graphs look like ther eis such a HUGE difference in the scores, its really confusing visually. the scores are very minor, make the graphs show the differences are only minor.

Glow9
06-07-2008, 11:27 PM
The game benchies still going to come out?

Leeghoofd
06-08-2008, 02:23 AM
Found this in a german hardware mag :

http://users.pandora.be/OAP/cache.JPG

Glow9
06-08-2008, 08:08 AM
Found this in a german hardware mag :

http://users.pandora.be/OAP/cache.JPG

eh? 2fps difference seems pointless to upgrade, I'm kinda eh about this graph

BNDMOD
06-08-2008, 08:21 AM
Very nice info bro..... this afternoo i'll read all this info slowly..... it's very interesting!

Leeghoofd
06-08-2008, 09:16 AM
eh? 2fps difference seems pointless to upgrade, I'm kinda eh about this graph

It's at only 1.8Ghz sir, if you use the CPU's at 3ghz gaps will be bigger

Glow9
06-08-2008, 09:30 AM
If they are al at 1.8, why would they different at 2, or 3? Seems like if there is differences they should be sorta consistent? No? I dunno. I guess I'd figure technology in the chips would be the determining factor *shrug*

Leeghoofd
06-08-2008, 01:46 PM
If I ran a game on my 100% Oc'ed E2140 at 3.2Ghz and would try the same game on my E6600 or even Q6600 the gameplay would feel totally different... beleive me I have found out on a LAN myself... 1Mb cache is too low for gaming, from 4mb on differences start to become less noticeable...