Hyper PI 0.99b

[vbo]

http://www.virgilioborges.com.br/virgilioborges/hyperpi/hyper_pi_0.99b.png

New result screen (read file pi_rec.dat2):
http://www.virgilioborges.com.br/virgilioborges/hyperpi/hyper_pi_results.png

Official site: http://www.virgilioborges.com.br/virgilioborges/hyperpi
Download version 0.99b here (http://www.virgilioborges.com.br/virgilioborges/hyperpi/hyper_pi_0.99b.zip) (~500KB)!

[MikalCarbine]

Been waiting for something like this

[Richard Dower]

Everytime i ran it with Vista SP1 it failed...stopped working.

[breakfromyou]

Doesn't work on XP...on both machines i tried it on.

[MikalCarbine]

Works for me on XP :confused: :confused: :confused:

[Sunfire]

Everytime i ran it with Vista SP1 it failed...stopped working.

It's working on my machine with Vista Ultimate x86 SP1 :up:
Try running it as an admin.

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8170/hyperpiqy3.th.png (http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8170/hyperpiqy3.png) http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/7836/hpi20080213074652bo2.th.png (http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/7836/hpi20080213074652bo2.png)

[Craftyman.]

Everytime i ran it with Vista SP1 it failed...stopped working.

Disable Audio services first, and then tick Audio when it comes up. Then you can reenable audio services.

[Bail_w]

Works for me on XP :confused: :confused: :confused:

Yes it does...

[bakalu]

One Core Score is faster than Two Core Score. Why ?

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/8246/whyaw4.jpg

[kiwi]

Doesn't work on XP...on both machines i tried it on.


Hmm, maybe it needs .dot net runtime

[KTE]

Great. Will test it soon. :toast:

[largon]

F-Secure Client Security anti-virus thinks it's a trojan.
:P

[3oh6]

first, off, i am loving the Hyper Pi front end. after 98B it has been a treat to work with. the first version was a little sluggish but your first update has really made it an excellent multi-pi front end. haven't even touched 99B yet but will start using it now.

one small suggestion though, it would be less confusing if you kept all your updates to one thread. you have the thread in the Xtreme Benchmarks section and it would be really nice if you simply updated the first post in that thread with a build log and each new version you post. otherwise you have different versions floating around and no one knows which is the newest. the guys who did CoreTemp and Memset have done it like this and it worked out rather nicely having a single "home" thread...this one:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=172569

other than that, keep up the excellent work, Hyper Pi is now the only way i run Super Pi for stability testing. it is working fine on Vista Ultimate x64 and fresh installs of XP Pro on P35, X38, and 790FX chipsets for me :up:

One Core Score is faster than Two Core Score. Why ?
with one thread it has all the cache to itself, with two threads it has to share the cache and this slows both threads down.

[KTE]

This is actually slightly quicker (0.1s) than Super Pi mod 1.5 XS on it's own even with a normal priority (IME). Tried them earlier today on both a Q6600 and a Phenom 9600BE.

[Kunaak]

One Core Score is faster than Two Core Score. Why ?

cause both cores being bogged down loses efficiency.

[pxhx]

Não gostei desse programa.

[biohead]

awesome!

[s3rv3r]

Não gostei desse programa.

You did not like, therefore you do not know the objective of the HyperPi, and at the very least you find that it is for substituting the SuperPi. But a simple way for you to understand, since failed to understand the objective, the HyperPi is only for being able to run the SuperPi in Two or More nuclei at the same time of beginning.

[Boogerlad]

is there going to be a linux version on source code?

[Millyons]

ran once, and 2 seconds slower that super PI on q6600 (ok efficiency np) but running second time froze the comp, and its super stable, not even oced much just at 3200, oh running win2003 server