PDA

View Full Version : Is it OK ? Sub 8min30sec with DDR2



K.J.
01-19-2008, 06:11 PM
http://francekj.googlepages.com/8m28.672s.PNG

-125'C Load LN2 1.872v Idle 1.900v BIOS

NO TWEAK , No MemSet
BIOS 4-4-4-4-1-25-3-3-2 and run directly in Win03

ASUS Blitz Formula BIOS 1302
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650es C738C551 @ 5718MHz 1.872v
LN2 Cooling Pote of my friend boblemanifique
Team Group DDR2-800 4-4-4-10 D9GMH @ 2.618v
Seagate 7200.10 IDE 320GB
Canopus G32 GeForce2 MX400
PC Power & Cooling TurboCool 1KW-SR


What a shame , My blitz Extreme is very bad , if < -50'C , it can't boot @ Dual Channel :( So finally i can only test with DDR2 on the Blitz Formula .

M.Beier
01-19-2008, 06:24 PM
Its a quite decent time, yes =)

Very great for DDR2 !
http://bird.zero.ad.jp/~zan89925/8_17.391.jpg about same frequency, just DDR3... A few percentage better, but DDR3 benefits alot !

Great tweaking KJ

K.J.
01-19-2008, 06:28 PM
Its a quite decent time, yes =)

Very great for DDR2 !
http://bird.zero.ad.jp/~zan89925/8_17.391.jpg about same frequency, just DDR3... A few percentage better, but DDR3 benefits alot !

Great tweaking KJ

:D No Tweak

My RAM DDR3 is too roxxxxxxxxxxx !!!!!!!!

if i can test 497x11.5 1:2 995MHz 7-6-5-18 1T for 32M or 500+ x11.5
Sub 8m10 will be not too difficult...

Supertim0r
01-19-2008, 08:53 PM
that's a sweet cpu :eek:

MaSell
01-19-2008, 10:17 PM
Canopus G32 GeForce2 MX400

vote 3dm01 :D

Vapor
01-19-2008, 10:20 PM
Sweet CPU and FSB :D

But why SuperPi 1.4?

Pt1t
01-19-2008, 11:30 PM
:D No Tweak

My RAM DDR3 is too roxxxxxxxxxxx !!!!!!!!

if i can test 497x11.5 1:2 995MHz 7-6-5-18 1T for 32M or 500+ x11.5
Sub 8m10 will be not too difficult...


Nice job


my CPU ? :D

lukas69
01-19-2008, 11:31 PM
Great Cpu i think with DD3 you can take less 8.20

dinos22
01-19-2008, 11:46 PM
very fast indeed

that FSB helps a lot :D

Oliver
01-20-2008, 12:36 AM
Really good job and your chip is good ;).

Keep pushing it.

before
01-20-2008, 02:33 AM
Nice one Kenny :) You may wish to use Spi mod1.5... ;)

I need a -125C CPU as well for my cascade. :D

K.J.
01-20-2008, 04:22 AM
1.4 has no bug ...

Tweaks is good for 1.5xs but not good for 1.4

When the systeme is ran into Windows , I test Pi directly

You can see , memory and all is no tweak , And Win03 , is a good systeme for test Pi , So It is fast.

dinos22
01-20-2008, 04:48 AM
just use 1.5 since we've all made a move for easy comparison
what's the big deal :shrug:

before
01-20-2008, 05:05 AM
1.4 has no bug ...

Tweaks is good for 1.5xs but not good for 1.4

When the systeme is ran into Windows , I test Pi directly

You can see , memory and all is no tweak , And Win03 , is a good systeme for test Pi , So It is fast.

I guess [Team Japan] (just an example) didn't wait for 1.5 to tweak their runs.


just use 1.5 since we've all made a move for easy comparison
what's the big deal :shrug:

I agree. :)

Kenny, personally, I don't know if it exists a real difference, and don't mind at all. The fact is that we (oc community) comprare our runs with a standard application; and the actual app is version 1.5. Simple as that. You know, if we don't take care about the standard, the comparison becomes utopian.

Please don't get me wrong, your run is great; I'm just talking about a detail. :up:

K.J.
01-20-2008, 06:43 AM
But Why 36GB 65nm i'm always not fast ?
my best 3.6GHz 1M = 13.984s
40GP 65nm 12.641s

I've saw many score of 13.7xx 13.8xx by 1.5XS and 12.4xx 12.5xx 4GHz
But there are not fast in 32M

Why ? 1M fast but 32M slow .
Strange . If 1M fast , 32M should be fast , too .

K.J.
01-20-2008, 06:47 AM
8m28sec. You think that is fast ?

No Copy Waza
No MemSet
No Tweak System
etc.

And 1302 BIOS is not very fast(memory timing)

So i think the 8m28sec is not really fast !!

This test is just for check a frequence for 3DMark in LN2 , so I dont need to push all things to maxi

before
01-20-2008, 07:39 AM
Kenny; it isn't a matter of fast or not fast... I don't really understand what you're talking about. :)

That's a great run. C'est un run tr&#232;s tr&#232;s roxx!! :D My point is only on the use of a standard in order to properly compare scores. Actual standard is 1.5, isn't it? Dunno what else to say. I don't say your run isn't valid or cheat, or anything like that, just that you may wish to use 1.5 in the future, in order to allow fair comparisons with others. :up: It's all about fairness.