best super pi times?

[xsky]

27s in SuperPi 1M Test

P4 3,4E @ 4634; P4C800-E; 2x512MB OCZ EB 3500 @ 272.6 @ 3-2-2-8

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/944927Screen.JPG

All I've done is the droop and vdimm mod. 1024MB 272.6mhz is nice on i875P, right?
Vcore 1.6V, Vdimm 3.4V

[SAE]

27s in SuperPi 1M Test

P4 3,4E @ 4634; P4C800-E; 2x512MB OCZ EB 3500 @ 272.6 @ 3-2-2-8

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/d...44927Screen.JPG

All I've done is the droop and vdimm mod. 272.6mhz is nice on i875P, right?
Vcore 1.6V, Vdimm 3.4V
Not bad :D ... but - dead link!!!

[xsky]

fixed it ;)

[bias_hjorth]

very impressive :toast:

[SAE]

Dual channel? Wow. That rocks, my German fellow :thumbsup:

[xsky]

thanks a lot :)

yes it's DC with PAT and PAM enabled
it was cooled by stock LS (if I didn't mention before)

[SAE]

thanks a lot :)

yes it's DC with PAT and PAM enabled
it was cooled by stock LS (if I didn't mention before)


You did not mention it ;)

[Crankster]

"stock" LS you gotta love this place =) Myself i get 35 secs in a moderately OCed barebon thats supersilent.

[xsky]

now warming up for 32M Test with good old Kingston BH-5.
starting with 1.45V Vcore and 3.4V Vdimm

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/944924_46.JPG

[Andrewv]

Hello Im new here, and this my one
P4 2.8c @ 3.36 (240*14, 1:1)
Abit ic7
twinmos 400mhz 256mb *2 2.5-3-3-8
http://s03.imagehost.org/0070/SuperPI-40s.jpg

[bias_hjorth]

Welcome to the madness Andrew :)

Nice start. Are you sure you cant push the cpu any further and eventually running with a divider?

[Andrewv]

Welcome to the madness Andrew :)

Nice start. Are you sure you cant push the cpu any further and eventually running with a divider?

TNX,
240mhz x 14 (CPU:Mem 1:1) its high level of my P4 2.8c D1 :\ bad cpu for OC

I cannot boot my comp at 240mhz with ratio 5:4 ;( (i think the problem with CPU and not with memory )

[SAE]

now warming up for 32M Test with good old Kingston BH-5.
starting with 1.45V Vcore and 3.4V Vdimm

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/944924_46.JPG
Nett, my friend! ;)

Get it on... :D

[xsky]

Thx!

Here my first sub 24min bench:

P4E 3.4 DO @ 4511.6MHz
P4C800E-Deluxe
2*256MB Kingston HyperX 3200 @ 265.4MHz 2-2-2-5

http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/23.58.JPG

[Andrewv]

Thx!

Here my first sub 24min bench:

P4E 3.4 DO @ 4511.6MHz
P4C800E-Deluxe
2*256MB Kingston HyperX 3200 @ 265.4MHz 2-2-2-5

http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/23.58.JPG

Nice, how you do 1mb ?

[xsky]

my result should be some posts before
27s
http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/27Screen.JPG

this is done with 2*512MB OCZ EB 3500

[Andrewv]

my result should be some posts before
27s
http://maitre.physik.uni-kl.de/~mkrauss/27Screen.JPG

this is done with 2*512MB OCZ EB 3500

nice

[cpulloverclock]

I activated the pat on my P4P800SE and FSB250 stable now because the dram latency is at 101 , before it was 215

a little comparison with the pat disabled and dram latency at 111...

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/p4p800sepatdisabled.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/p4p800sepatenabled.gif

[cpulloverclock]

P4 3.4E S478, wcooled, 1.45v in full, but u have to look at the Pat enabled at this fsb with the P4P800-SE :D

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/31s.gif

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/5m47s.gif

[SAE]

Hmm, cpu, no differences to spot there besides the pat thingy ;) :D

/edit. first post, I mean :D

[cpulloverclock]

Hmm, cpu, no differences to spot there besides the pat thingy ;) :D

/edit. first post, I mean :D
yep, pat disabled + dram latency at 111 VS pat enabled + dram latency at 101 = same perf in superpi 104... elsewhere I dont know

[SAE]

yep, pat disabled + dram latency at 111 VS pat enabled + dram latency at 101 = same perf in superpi 104... elsewhere I dont know
Aaahhhh... now I understood. You wanted to show that the dram latency makes up for missing PAT!?

Kewl :D

[cpulloverclock]

Aaahhhh... now I understood. You wanted to show that the dram latency makes up for missing PAT!?

Kewl :Dyes exactly :D

[LardArse]

Dunno how legit this patch is that updates FISTTP instructions for prescott:

http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/patch.JPG

www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/pipatch.zip

But it gave me a 23 second result:

http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/23sec.JPG

Think it shaves off 2secs for the scotties

[cpulloverclock]

I test it at 4077MHz

[xsky]

wooooow. at 4ghz my score changed from 32s to 29s. please god let it be legit :)
as i understand it it's no cheat as the program does still the same calculation but optimized for p4e?

[cpulloverclock]

wooooow. at 4ghz my score changed from 32s to 29s. please god let it be legit :)
as i understand it it's no cheat as the program does still the same calculation but optimized for p4e?

impressive

[cpulloverclock]

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/29s.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/28s.gif

[macci]

Dunno how legit this patch is that updates FISTTP instructions for prescott:
Makes it pretty much impossible to compare with original superpi results - which is not a good thing IMO. Where's the A64 patch?? :D

[LardArse]

Yeah, but with this out there its impossible to tell which version its runnning so just run the fastest version? :p:

[cpulloverclock]

20-21s, the new world record??

[Mauri Antero]

Damn where is the A64 patch :(

[macci]

After the patch its good for comparing different Prescotts but thats about it. Silly prescott-only bench.
I mean superpi has been the same for several years now and become a popular 'standard bench'. It was fairly easy to see the performance level of any given hardware (AMD or intel) just by running the SPi 1M test. Now someone (working for intel??) got a great idea and edited the code and made it 'prescott-optimized'. He should have edited the name of the benchmark too.

[cpulloverclock]

and I think that's not just optimized for the 1M, 8M and 32m too?
I test

It's not funny if there is nothing for the A64

[xsky]

yeh it would be more fun if there was an a64 patch but somehow it's ok as it is a prescott feature. maybe simular things are possible in real useful tasks and prescott becomes superior to the rest.
i don't know enough about these things but maybe someone can tell me...

[macci]

It's not funny if there is nothing for the A64
Its not funny that it wont run on any other CPU than Prescott (just tested W/ my P4EE and it crashes instantly).
I dont see how this edited-superpi has anything to do with any kind of realworld performance now.

[Mauri Antero]

:banana::banana::banana::banana:ty thing that in weekend gonna cool with co2 and ln2 myh precious FX-53 and with out that patch. :( It ain't so funny anymore

[cpulloverclock]

5m16s at 4097MHz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bad trip

[macci]

5m16s at 4097MHz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bad trip
hehe =)
I wonder if Aguri has been useing this patch for his latest DDR2 Superpi benchmarks? If not then it seems that he is the only person on the planet getting decent performance out of DDR2 mobos :D
edit: or maybe there is a 'DDR2 patch' available too??

[cpulloverclock]

hehe =)
I wonder if Aguri has been useing this patch for his latest DDR2 Superpi benchmarks? If not then it seems that he is the only person on the planet getting decent performance out of DDR2 mobos :D
edit: or maybe there is a 'DDR2 patch' available too??
yes he has because he gets 31s at 4148MHz like me but with 230/306

http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/aguri-no.3/index.html/p4-550-E0_test.htm

[LardArse]

Yep, its definitely way off in terms of Real world performance
Have no idea at all who wrote the patch

[Mauri Antero]

Yep, its definitely way off in terms of Real world performance
Have no idea at all who wrote the patch


Hmm checked ABOUT in the patch

-={ CodeFusion Runtime }=-
Generator: CodeFusion Wizard
Super PI was reverse engineered by
Igor Levicki

[Sucka]

Here's an improved one of mine, nothing special, but i was happy to get it.

http://www.sevenlabs.net/sucka/pictures/superpi5.jpg

[Sucka]

Sorry, just keep trying for more...

http://sevenlabs.net/sucka/pictures/superpi6.jpg

[Henesseynalert]

Here's mine AKA Vflux/Henesseynalert

Sucka, whats up!!bro!!! :)
Air Cooling 3.2E 5:4 Cas2.5-3-3-7 BL8 PAM Auto/Standard
http://images.dr3vil.com/uploads/Prescottsuperpi2.JPG

[Tek]

LS cooled 3700+ @ 1.66v:

http://server5.uploadit.org/files/nexus2525-1M30s.JPG

Messy WinXP, stuff run in background. Only had this 3700+ for less than a day. I think it can do better.

[Andrewv]

LS cooled 3700+ @ 1.66v:

http://server5.uploadit.org/files/nexus2525-1M30s.JPG

Messy WinXP, stuff run in background. Only had this 3700+ for less than a day. I think it can do better.

it's realy "ScrenShot" :D

[Mauri Antero]

hmm CO2 didn't improve my 1M time at all, but 8M 3 second faster than with prometia machII r404. Now meh best time in 8M is 4min 49s

[macci]

SPi 8M (non-patched) w/ 2.8A (D0):
http://www.akiba-pc.com/2.8A/424.gif

Here's the 8M Ranking at the moment and as far as I can tell none of the top 7 results is done w/ the patch.
http://www.akiba-pc.com/2.8A/spi8mrank.gif

[Hilppa]

Neither is mine at place #10 ;)

5468Mhz and 4:36

Congrats on the 4:24 time!

:banana:

[Mauri Antero]

Still way behind even with ln2 coz couldn't get 13 multier get working.
best 8m time with 12x270 4min 46s

[Henesseynalert]

Macci, Is that SuperPI on your download site unpatched?


TIA
Henessey

[Verdict]

In Finland we NEVER use cheat patch, that patch sucks so hard...

Fair Play :toast:

[Henesseynalert]

In Finland we NEVER use cheat patch, that patch sucks so hard...

Fair Play :toast:

I just tried the one from macci's site and the one with patch. I got the same score..........What's the deal!!!I'd like to run mine clean. No pressy optimisation ofcourse.... :toast:

[macci]

the one at akiba-pc.com is unpatched and was uploaded there long before the patch was even available. see if you find a difference between the versions in 2m or 4m test? 1m may in some cases give the same result I guess.

[Pejsen]

Why can't people just bench by the rules instead of reprogramming every-f***ing peice of software to score a lil better :mad: :confused:

[Henesseynalert]

the one at akiba-pc.com is unpatched and was uploaded there long before the patch was even available. see if you find a difference between the versions in 2m or 4m test? 1m may in some cases give the same result I guess.

Bro, I got the same results from 1M-4M with the SuperPI i downloaded from your site and the one i runned my 32sec record. I guess i've been running the un-patched version all along then..Since there's no way i can tell which one is patched or what not....I just had to make sure I trully earned my 32sec respectively. :toast:


Respect,
Henessey

[macci]

Yup Your more than likely running the unpatched version - like most of us. :)
Haven't seen pre-patched version upped anywhere yet so basically your running the original version if you haven't downloaded the patch and patched the superpi.exe file.

[Henesseynalert]

Yup Your more than likely running the unpatched version - like most of us. :)
Haven't seen pre-patched version upped anywhere yet so basically your running the original version if you haven't downloaded the patch and patched the superpi.exe file.

Nope, I didnt even know there was a patch ti'll I read all through page 1 from this thread. All i know is that i've had this copy of SuperPI back then in april....So i guess my 32sec is legit!!! :banana:

Thx for clarifying.......


Respect,
Henessey

[Andrewv]

Someone can give me link for this Patch, and explain me what it do ?

Thx

[aoc007]

according to your sig you dont have a prescott and you shouldnt anyway, its cheating. but the link is earlier in the thread.

[eva2000]

New personal bests for my AMD64 system in sig

http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/6002_650/3700/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/3_4/LDT_AUTO/10x/270-270-2226-1T-1.84-3.58-1.6-1.8_8-12-2212-8x-7x_3120/superpi-1m_31s.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/6002_650/3700/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/3_4/LDT_AUTO/10x/270-270-2226-1T-1.84-3.58-1.6-1.8_8-12-2212-8x-7x_3120/superpi-2m.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/6002_650/3700/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/3_4/LDT_AUTO/10x/270-270-2226-1T-1.84-3.58-1.6-1.8_8-12-2212-8x-7x_3120/superpi-8m.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/6002_650/3700/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/3_4/LDT_AUTO/10x/270-270-2226-1T-1.84-3.58-1.6-1.8_8-12-2212-8x-7x_3120/superpi-16m.jpg

[Andrewv]

according to your sig you dont have a prescott and you shouldnt anyway, its cheating. but the link is earlier in the thread.

Ok .. TNX

[Henesseynalert]

My base for 8M Superpi (Unpatched) I'll slowly break it soon. All done aircooling.
http://images.dr3vil.com/uploads/Prescott8msuperpi.JPG


Henessey :toast:

[Unseen]

my new record :D with my single stage phase change.

[RootX]

my new record :D with my single stage phase change.

WTG Bro, nice :D :toast: :D

[funkflix]

Finally!

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/35secpi.jpg

But now im out of the nforce2-World! S939 is waiting for me :cool:
Results next week then.

[Dagalidis]

my new record :D with my single stage phase change.

Impresive results Unseen....
Keep going lower... :toast:

[Andrewv]

according to your sig you dont have a prescott and you shouldnt anyway, its cheating. but the link is earlier in the thread.

You was sure, on my NW i cant run the patch

[aoc007]

Its only for presscott.

[Hilppa]

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tulokset/5424mhz_superpi8m.jpg

Too bad I forgot to use the i875-tweaker :( Could have shaved off a second perhaps. Not that i'd care for that one second anymore, since with a prescottpatch I can shave off 20 seconds :rolleyes:

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tulokset/prescottpatch.jpg

This is not a legit score ;)

[jjcom]

whats a Prescott patch?

[Mauri Antero]

whats a Prescott patch?

page 44

Dunno how legit this patch is that updates FISTTP instructions for prescott:

www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/AS8/pipatch.zip

Think it shaves off 2secs for the scotties


Congrats Hilppa :toast: :toast:
Old pap needs to figure out what went wrong with myh 13 multiplier :mad:

[cpulloverclock]

Some tests between the S478 and the S775 with a superpi (unpatched) :

P4C800 + 3.4E = 31s at 4040MHz full timings and tweaks
P4P800SE + 3.4E = 31s at 4077MHz full timings and tweaks
AA8 + 3.6E = 31s at 4152MHz DDR2 in asynch mode
P5P800 + 3.6E = 31s at 4160-4165MHz full timings and tweaks

The S775 has very bad perfs in DDR + DDR2...

[cpulloverclock]

best frequency in Water cooling for a superpi 1M with my 3.6E : 4286MHz and always 31s :rolleyes:

[bias_hjorth]

Why was the Prescott patch released anyway - A very stupid idea.

[Gamer]

http://users.pandora.be/gamer/Gskill/31.JPG

personal best.

[cold_ice]

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tulokset/5424mhz_superpi8m.jpg

Too bad I forgot to use the i875-tweaker :( Could have shaved off a second perhaps. Not that i'd care for that one second anymore, since with a prescottpatch I can shave off 20 seconds :rolleyes:

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tulokset/prescottpatch.jpg

This is not a legit score ;)Whats the batch code of this 2.8a?
very nice, LN2?

[mObSoFt]

I got 33 seconds with my LS...check my specs and tell me what I can change to make this better!

P4 3.4c@4.27 251x17 -27 degrees celsius per BIOS
Corsair XMS 2.4-4-4-8 will not boot any lower timings running at 1:1
Vapochill LS
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe BIOS 18
CPU voltage is 1.95
DDR voltage 2.65
AGP/PCI locked at 66.6/33.3

33 seconds SuperPI @ 4.27 P4 phase changed (http://home.insightbb.com/~mobsoft/images/SuperPI.JPG)

[_root.x]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v375/rickcastro/superpi.jpg


3500+ @ 2.5ghz 1.6v
Corsair 3200XLPro 250HTT 2.5-3-3-7 2.85v
Msi Neo2


Nothing like you guys best its my best :D

[cpulloverclock]

My best time with my 3.4E S478 D0 water cooled at 1.52v
the highest frequency with superpi is 4238MHz, not bad

My P4P800SE is better than my P4C800dlx with worse tweaks

4077MHz for 31s with my P4P800SE (dram latency 01)
4084MHz for 31s with my P4C800dlx (dram latency 111)


!!!!

SUPERPI UNPATCHED
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30s.gif


29s at 4320MHz

[cpulloverclock]

better than Aguri :D

http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/aguri-no.3/index.html/p4_32eg_test.htm

http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/aguri-no.3/index.html/p434e_v16175_i4229s248x17luna.gif

[cpulloverclock]

SuperPI 1M at 4258Mhz for the best frequency

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/5m38.gif

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/5m38..gif

[p4z1f1st]

could someone tell me, what the actual SuperPI-records for Intel and AMD are?

[blander]

could someone tell me, what the actual SuperPI-records for Intel and AMD are?

i think 23s for both

[p4z1f1st]

i think 23s for both

lol, ich hab doch extra hier gefragt, um DIR eine antwort geben zu können @ P3D ;)

[Try-this]

this setup: http://www.try-this.dk/Projekt%20Isolering/Isolering17,2.jpg

with liquid @ -4,2ºC from my waterchiller

gives me this (never mind the vcore, it flucates :rolleyes: ):
http://www.try-this.dk/33sek,1.jpg

EDIT: pictures of isolation here: http://www.tweak.dk/forum/thread.php?threadid=29622&boardid=1&styleid=1

[Victorshen]

CPU Prescott 2.8 D0 @315*14
Mobo: ASUS P4C800E-D rev2.0 droop modded
Ram: Corsair 3200LL BH5 256×2 Vdimm 3.54v with DDR booster
VGA Card: Hercules GF2 Ultra
Cooling: Mach2

Pi 1M=29s :toast:

http://digi.pchome.net/2004/10/29/nVIDIA_1099033467.jpg

[kiko]

better than Aguri :D



better than all the japanese :D

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/3042.png

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/P4-3G-GP/P4-3G-GP-TABLE.htm

Ciao

[thesaucier]

getting a bit better.

[Sheik]

:banana: Ah yeh finally cracked 30 seconds. But, used my Mushkin BH5.

:toast:

[charlie]

A little AIR-COOLED Winchester action....

30s @ 2810mHz

[Mauri Antero]

And same winchester with boxed cooler 30s and 2729Mhz.
Quite amaising prosessors these are. :D

[charlie]

And same winchester with boxed cooler 30s and 2729Mhz.
Quite amaising prosessors these are. :D

nice...
does tras=0 help your sPi?

[Mauri Antero]

tras 0 improves mem speed a bit, so is also helps with superpi

8M superPi runs in 5min 35s

[CodeRed]

tras 0 improves mem speed a bit, so is also helps with superpi

8M superPi runs in 5min 35s

I might give that a try, previous testing on a S754 chip showed no improvement in scores from Tras=5 down to 0, but I never tested for improved stability ;)

[Mauri Antero]

2 seconds better result with 8M 5min 33s with boosted air cooling (cold morning and windows open)

[CodeRed]

25 sec at last, on win2k too ;)

http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/superpi25sec.jpg

It wouldve been easier to just install win2003 than squeeze that last 20 MHz out of this chip :D

[Nikita]

25 sec at last, on win2k too ;)

http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/superpi25sec.jpg

It wouldve been easier to just install win2003 than squeeze that last 20 MHz out of this chip :D
Looks like the MSI is doing a good job :toast:

[macci]

Thats some real highspeed action there CodeRed :toast:
Nice timings :D

[GoriLLakoS]

@Corered....what memory do you have there???and what cooling????

[Ice_]

cpu > Amd/xp 2280mhz
mobo > Abit nf7-s v2.0
ram > Geil 3200 400mhz 2.5 3 3 6 2.8V (1x512)
vga Card > GF4 Tit 4200
air cooling

my Pi 1M > 48sek :/

[CodeRed]

@Corered....what memory do you have there???and what cooling????

mem is kingston KHX3200/256 .. pure BH5 :D
cooling is a R507 modded mach I

[funkflix]

Which Vdimm u need for this results? :)

[cpulloverclock]

SuperPI unpatched

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30.gif

Patched
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/28.gif

5100/5080 and 3008/3056 at 200 for the memory bench

[CodeRed]

Which Vdimm u need for this results? :)

3.55V for that run

Normally I use 3.6-3.65 but I found with the warmer temps (its going on summer here) that I got better clocks with slightly less voltage.

[sierra_bound]

Great time, CodeRed. Congrats. :toast:

[blinky]

25 sec at last, on win2k too ;)

[IMG]http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/superpi25sec.jpg[IMG]

It wouldve been easier to just install win2003 than squeeze that last 20 MHz out of this chip :Dhey codered, why dont u use your own processtimer proggy to show the exact time?

[CodeRed]

hey codered, why dont u use your own processtimer proggy to show the exact time?


25.937 sec for that run ;)

I managed 26.000 3 times @ 3220 MHz but it just wouldnt go under 26 sec :(

[cpulloverclock]

I just used the patched version to see if I could get 27s in WC :)

vcore : 1.53-1.55 full

5m32s for the 8M and 5m06s for the patched at 4233MHz

very nice proc for a D0 :)


Pat is enabled

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/28..gif

[Onepagebook]

http://www.e04hardware.com/record/fx5533gpi32m.jpg

[saci]

is 35sec ok for amd 64 @ 260x10 on 512 mb single chann ram @ 218 2,5-3-3-7 ?

[cpulloverclock]

30s at 4188MHz with my P4P800SE and 26"23s at 4198MHz for Spi 32M (english version with Xp is the best)
24"16s with the patched version and the 2K3 at 4178MHz

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/4192.gif

[LikwidKool]

So far with my winny, this is the best I can do. I am still pushing default multi. Will see later what I can do with dropping the multi and higher ram clock. Actually would that even make a difference, as I would imagine super pi is mainly a cpu bench?

MSI K8N Neo2
3200+ winny @ 265x10 1.65v
2x512 OCZ PC3700 2.5-3-3-10 1t @ 265

[Mrki]

my new result ;)

http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/9x295_OCZ_2.5_3_3_8_pi_33sek.jpg

[bias_hjorth]

The good´ old 3000 having some fun.

http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/31.gif - Man I wish I could do 30 but this is def. the max of this cpu at least on prommy.

[SADS]

hi there, first post :D hoorraah

i get 40s on the nose with my AMD 3500, will try and get some specs in sig soon.
I have also got some troubs OCing, i have some guesses as to what the solutions may be, however this is the wrong thread for them :p:

[Squid_Spit]

heres mine

[notoriousformula]

34 secs with A64 3000+ NC @ 2.7Ghz(270x10) 1.67V, PC3700EB 2.9Vdimm

[bias_hjorth]

3700cg, kinda poor ballistix
http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/29.jpg
def. 28sec with some better memory!

[CodeRed]

3700cg, kinda poor ballistix

def. 28sec with some better memory!

Easy 28 sec with BH5 are good timings ... 28 sec @ 2994 (11x272) on a 1Mb S754.

[funkflix]

I think the Proz. will give me another 100 MHz easy! And tomorrow i will give
them BH5 +3,6V and have some 1:1 action :D First day playing with A64.

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi31.jpg

[bias_hjorth]

Easy 28 sec with BH5 are good timings ... 28 sec @ 2994 (11x272) on a 1Mb S754.


Yeah :D. The only problem is that I dont have any high speed modules. My ballistix craps out at 240..

[Pejsen]

Yeah :D. The only problem is that I dont have any high speed modules. My ballistix craps out at 240..


Very nice scores and tweaking on every cpu :)

[bias_hjorth]

thank you :toast:
The 3000 was very tweaked. I havent even started tweaking for real on the 3700 yet so I hope I´ve another second to gain :D

[Tom Holck]

thank you :toast:
The 3000 was very tweaked. I havent even started tweaking for real on the 3700 yet so I hope I´ve another second to gain :D

You meen +3700 not 3700Mhz

[Tom Holck]

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI

[funkflix]

Holy Sh**!

Any SuperPi run? :)

[bias_hjorth]

You meen +3700 not 3700Mhz

I am sorry but I dont understand you?
I didnt write 3700mhz anywhere?
I wrote the 3000 and was refering to my older cpu which Pejsen did to. And I wrote 3700 afterwards and was ofcause refering to the 3700+

[Crow]

:slobber:

[Zeus]

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI

Over 2 seconds better than the score from the portugese guys! :slobber:

Well done!! :toast:

You seem to be the master of PiFast. ;)

[Tom Holck]

Over 2 seconds better than the score from the portugese guys! :slobber:

Well done!! :toast:

You seem to be the master of PiFast. ;)

I like that little bench :D

quick and easy

[cpulloverclock]

I like that little bench :D

quick and easy
very good and cpumark, 3dmark, Superpi 838? :slobber:

[Tom Holck]

very good and cpumark, 3dmark, Superpi 838? :slobber:

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit

[cpulloverclock]

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit
:p: :toast:

[mg84]

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit
congratulation, your the number 1 :toast:

[CodeRed]

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:

[Tom Holck]

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:

LoL :toast:

btw. thanks for Tweak64 it was used well :p:

[cpulloverclock]

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:
he is changing his bad FX-55 :D

[CodeRed]

he is changing his bad FX-55 :D

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet

[Tom Holck]

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet

Give me a 939 mobo at 2.2 volt, then I'll give you 3.9Ghz :p:

[cpulloverclock]

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet
I think memesama can have 21s at 3620-3630MHz and 21s at 3750-3760MHz

[cpulloverclock]

Give me a 939 mobo at 2.2 volt, then I'll give you 3.9Ghz :p:
the future DFI S939 board

[CodeRed]

I think memesama can have 21s at 3620-3630MHz and 21s at 3750-3760MHz


22 sec @ 3630 ... whats he running TCCD @ 330 MHz?

[blander]

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI

i will see a superpi 1m run :slobber:

[misteroadster]

i'm going to do a battery of tests to know how much mhz wants my FX with about 255/270 1:1 to have 1 sec between 2442 mhz and 2850 , it should be interresting.
here is the first :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/32s2442.JPG

the second, with same timings but desynch 183: 283X183/200=258Mhz.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2547.JPG

Third 291X183/200=266Mhz
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30s2618.JPG

4th 301X183/200=276Mhz
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/29s2717.JPG

[Tom Holck]

i will see a superpi 1m run :slobber:

Already done :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=591000&postcount=1149

It was so fast, that you did'n se it

22 Sek :cool:

[misteroadster]

tom can you have the same times /same frequency than me ?

My last screenshot , my FX53 can't give me much :
I've added a piece of fun with my FSB and desynch 150 :D :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/28s2841.JPG

[misteroadster]

I've done 26sec @ 30..Mhz with my FX55 , opp did 24 sec at 34..Mhz , Tom 22 at 36..Mhz ??
I deduct there's 2 sec missing between 3000 and 3400Mhz. Strange. :confused:

[blander]

Already done :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=591000&postcount=1149

It was so fast, that you did'n se it

22 Sek :cool:

very nice, what's the wr?

[Zeus]

Guys,

I have a question about SuperPi.
If i run SPi 1m, 2m or 4m CPU utilization is 100% throughout the entire run but as soon as i try 8m or higher, CPU utilization fluctuate between 0 and 100%.
Also, 32m took 44minutes to complete at 10x235, not good at all i think.

I have no programs running in the background.

WTF is causing this? :confused:
Anyone else with this problem?

http://www.dc3k.com/hosted/getimg/CPU_util.jpg

Look at the CPU utilization statistic diagram. :(

[Learn]

Guys,

I have a question about SuperPi.
If i run SPi 1m, 2m or 4m CPU utilization is 100% throughout the entire run but as soon as i try 8m or higher, CPU utilization fluctuate between 0 and 100%.
Also, 32m took 44minutes to complete at 10x235, not good at all i think.

I have no programs running in the background.

WTF is causing this? :confused:
Anyone else with this problem?

http://www.dc3k.com/hosted/getimg/CPU_util.jpg

Look at the CPU utilization statistic diagram. :(

it's windows 2000? use windows xp or windows 2003 server :)

[Zeus]

Is win2K the culprit??

[bachus_anonym]

i'm not sure but it might be caused by some sort of instability...
what sometimes happens (if you look at processes window) is a process called drwtsn.exe kicks in stealing cpu clocks... i'm not sure what causes debugger to kick in....
i got that sometimes when i push FSB to high on my Infinity...

[Learn]

Is win2K the culprit??

yes, it's bad with super pi > 1M

[Zeus]

I can imagine that but 2350MHz isn't that high i'd say, it's prime stable at that speed.
If i remember right i have this at default speed as well, have to try again to be sure.
Thanks for your input anyway. ;)

[cpulloverclock]

2 f**ked and faked scores :rolleyes: :mad:

19 & 21s...
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi

[Tom Holck]

I've done 26sec @ 30..Mhz with my FX55 , opp did 24 sec at 34..Mhz , Tom 22 at 36..Mhz ??
I deduct there's 2 sec missing between 3000 and 3400Mhz. Strange. :confused:

I'm at 3730 64 bit OS misteroadster.

Depending of OS and tweaks and Ram-speed:

25 sec 3120 Mhz (64 OS) 940 Mobo
24 sec 3350 Mhz (32 OS) 940
23 sec 3520 Mhz (64 OS) 939
22 sec 3730 Mhz (64 OS) 939
21 sec ? my gess 3950

Btw nice FSB speed you got, my max is 313 then Ram is 3-4-4-8 :toast:

2 f**ked and faked scores :rolleyes: :mad:

19 & 21s...
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi

Yes, the one is now removed, but still 21/3825/975/244 must be fake at least at least 100 mhz to slow, and slow FSB :(

[misteroadster]

Okay tom, are you sure 2003 64 bits is faster than 2003 32bits?
25 sec at 3120 on 940 is very impressive !!!!
Can you try to analyse the progression of the 939 and the same 64 or 32bits OS when you ll got the time ?
As you could see on my screenshots :
the best for 1sec gain :2547-2619=80mhz with same settings, just FSB increased.
After that 1sec again between : 2619-2717 =100mhz same setting, just FSB increased.
And 2717-2847=130mhz same settings but FSB-20Mhz.

I've done 26sec at 3060 but i can do better now , 2847-3060 =213 mhz/2sec.
I understand your FX 939 is not better than your 940 setup , normally it's 1 sec better easy.
Give a try with your ECC sticks , i think it'll be interresting.

Tom turn on my light please , and of course congrats, if i was nearest from you , i'll lend you my BH-5 and my X800 :toast:

[cpulloverclock]

Tom u dont want to test a dothan + aopen with your cascade? 100% compatibility

[Tom Holck]

Okay tom, are you sure 2003 64 bits is faster than 2003 32bits?
25 sec at 3120 on 940 is very impressive !!!!
Can you try to analyse the progression of the 939 and the same 64 or 32bits OS when you ll got the time ?
As you could see on my screenshots :
the best for 1sec gain :2547-2619=80mhz with same settings, just FSB increased.
After that 1sec again between : 2619-2717 =100mhz same setting, just FSB increased.
And 2717-2847=130mhz same settings but FSB-20Mhz.

I've done 26sec at 3060 but i can do better now , 2847-3060 =213 mhz/2sec.
I understand your FX 939 is not better than your 940 setup , normally it's 1 sec better easy.
Give a try with your ECC sticks , i think it'll be interresting.

Tom turn on my light please , and of course congrats, if i was nearest from you , i'll lend you my BH-5 and my X800 :toast:

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:

Tom u dont want to test a dothan + aopen with your cascade? 100% compatibility

Tel me about it!?

[aoc007]

Dothan on a cascade? Now that I would love to see :slobber:

[cpulloverclock]

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:



Tel me about it!?a dothan at 3.8GHz is more powerful than a FX-55 at the same frequency

[Tom Holck]

a dothan at 3.8GHz is more powerful than a FX-55 at the same frequency

OK, when do I test it :banana4:

[zakelwe]

Excellent Superpi and pifast scores Tom. I particularily like the pifast score :)

Edging slowly towards the magic 30second barrier ( some way to go though ).

Regards

Andy

[misteroadster]

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:



Tel me about it!?
Thanks tom.
Can you try yours ECC sticks on 939 if it works ?
Do some tests at same timings with ECC- and non ECC ram , and you ll can touch de diff between 939 and 940.

[funkflix]

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi30.png

I wonder which clocks i would need, to get the 29 sec. ?!

[CTKP]

Running 1:1 will get you there.

[funkflix]

Yeah, BH5 @ 310 2.0-2-2-5! :banana:

[misteroadster]

Running 1:1 will get you there.
Yes, probably :toast: if i could have 30 sec at 2674 With winXp you can have 29 sec at 2780 easy with 2K3 server and 278 2/2/2/1 1:1.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/350030sec.JPG

[funkflix]

How much Volts ~ for 275 2.0-2-2-5? 3,75 + i think!

[macci]

I wonder which clocks i would need, to get the 29 sec. ?!
w/ that RAM divider mine reaches 29sec at 2817MHz (11x256) (http://www.akiba-pc.com/939/spi1m_29s_2817.gif) under W2K.

[funkflix]

How much Volts on ur 3200+ ?Thats exactly the same settings i have, just
a few MHz more. U tweaked it with A64-Tweaker?

Edit: Ah, ok ~ 1,8V.

[funkflix]

I cant get my 3200+ stable over 2800MHz, doesnt metter how much Volts.
1,76 was the max.! It runs better with less Volts! Do u think the Heatspreader
ist the Problem? Maybe i should cut him off! Can run SuperPi with 2790 MHz
@ 1,59V! Strange! I can run the BH5 at an lower Multi @ 260 2-2-2-5 1T
with 3,45V, so i think thats not the problem!

[cpulloverclock]

eheh not bad :cool:

I'm 6th of the P4-36GP, I get 33s at 3705MHz :cry:
http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

31s at 4026MHz with only a fsb of 236.8 :)

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30...gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3600.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3597.gif

[zyx]

29 bh5 2-2-2-5 dfi nf3 250gb. 1.85vcore

[kiko]

eheh not bad :cool:

I'm 6th of the P4-36GP, I get 33s at 3705MHz :cry:
http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

31s at 4026MHz with only a fsb of 236.8 :)



nice work there cpu. :)
BTW a 3.4 D0 can be unlock on a P4C800-E?
coz i can not find a 2.8 D0. :D

Ciao

[Pejsen]

29 bh5 2-2-2-5 dfi nf3 250gb. 1.85vcore

1mb cache?? NICE result!
:cool:

[zyx]

1mb cache?? NICE result!
:cool:


yeah man, 1m cache. thanks

[cpulloverclock]

33s...

very nice time

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3708.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3708.41.gif

[cpulloverclock]

:D google is my friend :banana4:

http://www.thelab.gr/archive/topic/4824-1.html

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/ProcessTimer.exe

already 0.040

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3700.gif

[HaLDoL]

30 seconds
DFI nf3
A64 claw
BH5 @ 3.70V
100% air

http://kaine.studentenweb.org/superpi.1M.30sec.jpg

[misteroadster]

My best for 35 sec (stock FX53's time).
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/35sec2221.JPG

And here a funny 1M :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/21loop.JPG

[JBREAKS]

thats mine not sure what it means

[Pejsen]

And here a funny 1M :confused:

*PIC*


LOL that makes no sense at all. If i remember correct Tom H once ran a SuperPI 1M with only 18loops :confused:

[HaLDoL]

How much Volts ~ for 275 2.0-2-2-5? 3,75 + i think!
I need 3.65 for 277

[misteroadster]

WR ? :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2450.JPG

[cpulloverclock]

I'm in the tanuki's database of the P4 36GP

6th :)

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

[cpulloverclock]

WR ? :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2450.JPG
yes!!

send u result here

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/24-GP/24-GP-TABLE.htm

yok@mx.biwa.ne.jp <yok@mx.biwa.ne.jp>


try a jap superpi, maxmem=104 to improve the score...

gogogogo

[zakelwe]

So the highest air cooled AMD is 3027 ? I did 3009 the other day without trying too hard which puts me in 3rd place.

It's getting colder here as well ! :)

Regards

Andy

[FreshMeat]

http://mitglied.lycos.de/freshmeat666/sp34.JPG

[Stonecoldkilla]

I guess this one aint to bad.I just got the system up and runnig and still playing with it some.

[Formann]

I dont know what made me try super-pi with my surfing/gaming install, but suddenly it got a little bit extiting. This is a WindowsXP SP1 install with absolutely no tweaks.

A64 3500+ @ 2670Mhz (1.7v Air-cooled; SLK948-U /w 70mm 3300RPM fan, 21c room temp)
267*10 2-2-2-8-12-16

This is a crappy NewCastle... lol

http://privat.bluezone.no/forman/images/31sek.JPG


Tomorrow im gonna bench with Win2003, A64 Tweaker etc. 30sek Should be doable :D
Not too bad for a poor 512kb chip...

[enduracell]

Formann very nice score.
What mobo are u using?

[Crankster]

Formann, 29 is doable if you can get 275+ fsb and ramdisk. Fight for your fellow newcastle owners against the tide of winnies and clawhammers!

[SAE]

Formann, 29 is doable if you can get 275+ fsb and ramdisk. Fight for your fellow newcastle owners against the tide of winnies and clawhammers!
Hmm. In what way a ram disk helps? Erm, ... I mean, IMO it can only help during larger calculations like 16M/32M, can't it?

Please tell me how to set up a Ramdrive (I do not really know much about it except the fact, a winME bootdisk uses one - but that's DOS ;) )

[Formann]

Formann very nice score.
What mobo are u using?

Its a Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939. Not too bad, but the vcore is all over the place. Not very stable. Think im gonna try the MSI to.


Crankster: I wont get my BH5 to do 275+. One of the sticks can do 280 @ 3.55v, but the other wont do more than 270 @ 3.5v
The 3500+ is maxed @ 2670Mhz unless i do a vmod. (or open-window-mod :p: )

Maybe 29sek is doable with 271-272 1:1 and fully tweaked 2003.... hmmm.

[kristos]

I've been told that you can get better scores on superpi if you use windows 2003 server but there are so many different versions like "corporate" and "enterprise" or just plain server.

can someone tell me wich one too get? :shrug:

[Hilppa]

More here (http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=598315#post598315)

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tulokset/5575mhz_superpi8m.jpg

:banana:

[rkolegendkiller]

45 Second's with AMD athlon xp 2500+@ 2.43ghz.

[zabomb4163]

Just tried that test.

Is 33s OK?

It's 33 sek on 4260 and also 33s at 4353 ?

funni test.:rolleyes:

4260 mhz ???

[phyrexia]

mine is 33seconds on a
AMD64 clawhammer 2000@2400 9x265 HT 3X DDR at 265 OCZ VoltMod Watercooled Self Made

[cpulloverclock]

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3691.23.gif

[zyx]

28sec. dfi nf3 3400+ 1m cache 1x512 bh-6 3.3vdimm 1.9v core cooling 2 stage phache change by ice of hellas *thelab.gr*

[SwimmerBoy]

45 Second's with AMD athlon xp 2500+@ 2.43ghz.

That's too much! Need to improve that :D :stick:

[funkflix]

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi292.jpg

Timings : 2.0-2-1-2-7-16 1T

And that is the best i can bench, but no 28sec! :(

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi295.jpg

Where can i get the "Process Timer"? Want to know how far i'm away from the 28 sec! :D

(all watercooled)

[Learn]

really Nice GravediggA...

here you go:

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=492715&postcount=777

[funkflix]

really Nice GravediggA...

here you go:

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=492715&postcount=777

Thx m8! :)

Will give it a try tomorrow!

[Tom Holck]

4260 mhz ???

LOL

It is long time ago, it was a P4. 3.2 mhz with Prommy R404 and semicascade from a old Vapochill.


Today its new WR in the difficult M32

It's 64 bit win 2003 server, had to lower the speed 100 mhz :rolleyes: But

Sub 20 min :banana:

[Pejsen]

LOL

It is long time ago, it was a P4. 3.2 mhz with Prommy R404 and semicascade from a old Vapochill.


Today its new WR in the difficult M32

It's 64 bit win 2003 server, had to lower the speed 100 mhz :rolleyes: But

Sub 20 min :banana:

:toast:

[cpulloverclock]

Tom
it give that when I click on ur screen url here http://holicho.lib.net/pi3355/pi3355.htm

Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the webmaster

I uploaded ur score, if u want to change this link...
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/TomHolcksPi32(WR).JPG

as u want of course :)

[Tom Holck]

Thanks cpulloverclock :toast:

dono what happend

btw the bench was hard to do, in OS64 sometimes the ramspeed don't change when the FSB change? Had to try several times. And a lot of Heat comming from that FX at that speed :flame:

[zabomb4163]

LOL

It is long time ago, it was a P4. 3.2 mhz with Prommy R404 and semicascade from a old Vapochill.


Today its new WR in the difficult M32

It's 64 bit win 2003 server, had to lower the speed 100 mhz :rolleyes: But

Sub 20 min :banana:

lol. thats where my confusion came from. i always thought you just benched amd and 4.2ghz seemed a little far fetched for amd at this point

[aNabolic]

http://www.mi7clan.com/superpi.jpg

http://www.mi7clan.com/pi.jpg

P4 3.4EE

[zakelwe]

Tom
it give that when I click on ur screen url here http://holicho.lib.net/pi3355/pi3355.htm

Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the webmaster

I uploaded ur score, if u want to change this link...
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/TomHolcksPi32(WR).JPG

as u want of course :)

Hi Cpulloverclock,

Can you get this air cooled FX-55 to the Japanese

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/speed3.jpg
http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/speed1.jpg
http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/speed2.jpg

I think it beats their air cooled record but do not know where to send it .. cheers

Also pifast and superpi air cooled

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/speed4.jpg
http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/speed6.jpg

more to come tomorrow hopefully, it will be colder.

Regards

Andy

[Zeus]

New CPU, new score:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19674&stc=1

Just watercooled. :)

[FrozenGPU]

31 seconds, not too shabby! :)

[kristos]

P4c 2.8 M0 @ ~4gig on air (thermalright xp-120, 120mm delta on 3/5 of the max rev.)
1.7Vcore bios
asus p4c800e-dlx unmodded (no sinks on the mosfets/PLL's, no Vmods) 1019 bios
win xp pro sp1
blackviper's registry patch to disable services.
without intelinside's northwood pi patch.

tips for better scores are welcome :D

http://users.skynet.be/MesjogemeH/super%20pi%20P4%20no%20patch.JPG

[Mauri Antero]

Myh first Intel and first day result with air Zalman 7700 boosted with open window.
Intel 560
Abit AS8
KHX3000
Hopefully this is close time to those clocks

http://netti.nic.fi/~jhermune/56030.jpg

[Mauri Antero]

Day two with Intel legit version of SuperPI 1M
Aircooled 560

http://netti.nic.fi/~jhermune/56029.jpg

[chikitano]

My last result

http://img130.exs.cx/img130/6879/3783.th.jpg (http://img130.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img130&image=3783.jpg)

if I can fix the problem with the voltage will improve something

Salu2.

[chikitano]

Hello:

one secon less, and less vcore :D

http://img99.exs.cx/img99/6020/7315.th.jpg (http://img99.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img99&image=7315.jpg)

Salu2.

[Learn]

33s, Mobile 2500+, liquid 12.5°c

[kakaroto]

My new one, seems the fastest Newcastel S754 :D

Mach 1 R507
Gskill PC4400

http://www.xs4all.nl/~famchow/A64_3400/3400+%200.6/superpi1M_3.1GHz_11.JPG

[Pejsen]

My new one, seems the fastest Newcastel S754 :D

Mach 1 R507
Gskill PC4400


Hi Kakaroto

That is really NICE! Im on 29s with my NC 3400+ @ 272 * 11 1:1 cas 2 5 2 2 T1

[shidokanjohn]

My new 3.2 D0 :)
http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=119797

[saaya]

wow this sticky is old... :D

making room for new stickies since we have an mbot updated superpi sticky now :)

[iMAX]

My result with
MSI K8N Neo2 (bios 1.3b6)
Winny 3500+
Gskill 4400

[SAE]

My result with
MSI K8N Neo2 (bios 1.3b6)
Winny 3500+
Gskill 4400
Nice clocks... that's aircooling, I assume!?

[iMAX]

Nice clocks... that's aircooling, I assume!?


No air, water but very hot :D (45C)

[funkflix]

wow this sticky is old... :D

making room for new stickies since we have an mbot updated superpi sticky now :)

Hmm, this "mbot-thing" never worked for me, tryed it a few times...
And the first place at the 1M is an P4 with 10 seconds! :stick: :)

[SAE]

No air, water but very hot :D (45C)
:lol:

[MrSeanTsontas]

Μy best score air cooled and A.C. compressor..... :D
Not bad for single channel A64.....

[zyx]

27s with newcastle 3400+ 11multi with 183 divader 251memory bh-5 2-2-2-5
cooling 2stage phase change by ice of greece

[NonProphets]

32 sec on amd 64 300 @ 2.7 w/ mem @ 250 (2.5-3-3-8)

[arbiter]

http://img9.exs.cx/img9/5173/t5a10x27729pi.jpg

bh5 modül
2 2 2 1t & ram tweak

[SAE]

27s with newcastle 3400+ 11multi with 183 divader 251memory bh-5 2-2-2-5
cooling 2stage phase change by ice of greece
Great one, zyx :thumbsup:

Wanna share some pics of your cascade??? :D

[papatsonis]

Arbiter , EXCELLENT :) spi score , for the clocks , where u hit the 30" ? (to compare with mine,at 2703 ,ram 245,7)

[zyx]

Great one, zyx :thumbsup:

Wanna share some pics of your cascade??? :D

thanks sae.
sure here ;)
ant here the link but is in greece
http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5695

[zyx]

here ant one 32m with newcastle 1.84vcore 1x512 bh-6 corsair with 3.3volt dfi nf3 183 divider 11multi of cpu

[arbiter]

Arbiter , EXCELLENT :) spi score , for the clocks , where u hit the 30" ? (to compare with mine,at 2703 ,ram 245,7)
thanks .
267x10 30pi (max ram tweak) :)

[Orker]

32sec here @ 1M

[W4nK5ta]

another 32s shot with a heavily tweaked win xp and some bh-5 ram @ 3,4 v... ;)

http://img124.exs.cx/img124/8027/SuperPI1M-A64350026GHz.jpg

in the next weeks i'll try a 3000+ or 3200+ chip - i hope it will perform better than my 3500+. :( 2,6 ghz is fully stable with 1,55 v, but one single mhz more and i can't even run super pi(the multi/v-core doesn't matter). :(

[shidokanjohn]

P4 3.2E Do
More to come with 410 gas :D


http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=125693

[shidokanjohn]

And 1mb

[mike.elmes]

26 seconds

[Zeus]

It was hard but i got it, 30seconds on a watercooled S754 NewCastle! :banana:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=20661&stc=1

[Zanr Zij]

26 seconds


Can U show ur running like Zeus ?

U can see mine :D :D :D

/edit : mine is cheat ? So what about u ?

[aCidbAbY]

thanks sae.
sure here ;)
ant here the link but is in greece
http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5695


holy crap dude you are a madman how do you work in that area?
that isnt even an office anymore its a lab :stick:

[mike.elmes]

Can U show ur running like Zeus ?

U can see mine :D :D :D

/edit : mine is cheat ? So what about u ?
No cheaters allowed around here! 26 seconds as advertised :D