View Full Version : 512MB Inno3D 8800GT OC Edition - 650/1900 > 742/2052 easy
eva2000
12-01-2007, 08:56 AM
My twin babies arrived a few days ago - 2x 512MB Inno3D 8800GT OC Edition 650/1900 cards :cool:
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_01.JPG (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/)
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_10.JPG (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_10.html)
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_14.JPG (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_14.html)
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_15.JPG (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/videocards/inno3d/8800GT_OC/photos/Inno3d_8800GT_15.html)
Going to have fun putting them through their paces with this power house cpu - QX9650 Yorkfield :D
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/cpus/QX9650_L739A644/QX9650_02.JPG
First up will be on Gigabyte X38-DQ6 one card at a time, then Asus 680i Striker Extreme for SLI :)
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/motherboards/gigabyte/x38/preview/001.jpg
eva2000
12-01-2007, 08:57 AM
System:
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 L739A644 Retail OEM
CPU Cooling: Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme + 120x25mm Delta 75cfm fan + MX-2 TIM
Gigabyte X38-DQ6 F6B & F7D bios supplied Gigabyte
512MB 8800GT Inno3D OC Edition stock 650/1512/1900 with 169.02 WHQL drivers
2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-8500 dual channel kit
Memory cooling: 120x25mm Thermaltake 81cfm fan
160GB Seagate 7200.7 NCQ SATA port 2
2x3GB Gigabyte I-RAM raid 0 purchased from Auspcmarket.com.au
Pioneer DVD-RW
620W Corsair HX620 PSU supplied by Corsair
WinXP Pro SP2 Nlite Fully Updated.
The 512MB 8800GT Inno3D OC Edition cards come factory clocked at 650/1500/1900 according to GPUZ. But Rivatuner 2.06 reports them as 648/1512/1900.
Idle and load temps range from 41-49C idle to 59-62C load in an open desktop bench system.
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/8x/2.66c/400-533_4448_536-35-5_trd8-1_2T_1.275-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/rivatuner_gpuz.png
Seems I can easily hit 742/1836/2052 for 3dmark06 at least. For GPU and Memory 3dmark06 freezes at 756Mhz and 2074Mhz respectively. Haven't found max for shader clock yet only tested at 1836Mhz for now.
3dmark06 score scaling with clocks as follows:
QX9650 @8x400FSB = 3200Mhz
@650/1512/1900 = 13,884
@742/1728/1900 = 14,833
@742/1728/1998 = 15,035
@742/1728/2052 = 15,095
@742/1836/2052 = 15,300 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3974865)
Click image below for full screenshot
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/8x/2.66c/400-533_4448_556-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.275-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_15300_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/8x/2.66c/400-533_4448_556-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.275-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_15300.png)
eva2000
12-01-2007, 08:58 AM
Putting it altogether GPU/Shader/Memory clocks for 512MB Inno3D 8800GT OC Edition I managed to easily bench at 742/1836/2052 with exception for 3dmark2003 I ran with lower shader clock of 1783mhz.
Managed to easily break 16k barrier for single 512MB Inno3D 8800GT OC in 3dmark06 and pulls off very decent runs for 3dmark05/2003 and just under 75k mark for 3dmark2001 :D
3dmark06 = 16,088 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3975150)
3dmark05 = 24,427 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3735597)
3dmark2003 = 45,860 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5626705)
3dmark2001 = 74,961 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9295769) (LOD = 4), 72,188 (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2001_742-1836-1026_72188.png) (no LOD)
AM3 = 245,219
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_16088_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_16088.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark05_742-1836-1026_24427.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2003_742-1783_1026_45860_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2003_742-1783_1026_45860.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2001_742-1836-1026_74961_l4.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/am3_742-1836-1026_245219_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/10x/2.66c/400-533_4448_558-48-5_trd6-1_2T_1.5-0.5v_Nv_0.15_0.30_turbo_900mv_100psmch/8800GT_45/am3_742-1836-1026_245219.png)
eva2000
12-01-2007, 08:58 AM
Pushing to even further highs - clocked QX9650 up to 4104Mhz - 9x456FSB 4:5 divider with memory @570Mhz 4-4-4-8 :D
3dmark06 = 16,222 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3978759)
3dmark05 = 24,931 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3736630)
3dmark2003 = 46,298 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5627047)
3dmark2001 = 76,916 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9295895) (LOD = 5.3)
AM3 = 249,628
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_16222_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark06_742-1836-1026_16222.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark05_742-1836-1026_24931.png
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2003_742-1783_1000_46298.png[/URL]
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2001_742-1836-1026_76916_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/3dmark2001_742-1836-1026_76916.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/am3_756-1836-1026_249628_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/8800GT_45/am3_756-1836-1026_249628.png)
Include my Pcmark05 new personal best of 17,419 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=1241536) :D
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/pcmark05_8800gt_742-1836-1026_17419_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Gigabyte/x38_dq6_results/QX9650/ultra120/crucial/8500t_nk/9x/2.5a/456-570_4448_558-56-5_trd9-1_2T_1.55-0.7v_Nv_0.2_0.35_turbo_1v_100psmch/pcmark05_8800gt_742-1836-1026_17419.png)
sdumper
12-01-2007, 09:06 AM
Eva these cards are really fun but im not ready to ditch my x38 yet for a sli mobo so im going to pick up a pair of 3870's for Xfire.
That said I love this 8800gt and would recommend it to anyone...
Heres a AM3 from me last night...and a mediocre attempt at a highly overclocked 3dmark06
Of course my CPU was going pretty fast...
http://www.blazingpc.com/forum/showpost.php?p=108432&postcount=436
eva2000
12-01-2007, 09:09 AM
First up will be on Gigabyte X38-DQ6 one card at a time
;) :)
Congrats on 270k mate.. shame my QX9650 ain't that great on air/water topping out around 4176Mhz on Gigabyte X38-DQ6 and 4234Mhz on Asus Blitz Formula/Extreme.
sdumper
12-01-2007, 09:14 AM
Eva these chips are loads of fun on Ln2 and SS maybe you can give it a run.
BTW when you get a few minutes I would like to ask your advice on some good DDR3 and am hoping you can point me in the right direction.
eva2000
12-01-2007, 09:21 AM
Yeah do have plans to put it on my Kayl Black FrozenSS 1/4HP no colder than -40C to -33C but will have to do for now :)
DDR3 = Cellshock DDR3-14400, Crucial DDR3-12800, OCZ PC3-14400 would be my picks..
BeardyMan
12-01-2007, 09:29 AM
is there a reason why you black out a part of the cpu? :)
eva2000
12-01-2007, 09:35 AM
serial number blacked out hehe :)
From hipro's thread the 3 digits i blanked out are 073 :)
BeardyMan
12-01-2007, 10:07 AM
serial number blacked out hehe :)
From hipro's thread the 3 digits i blanked out are 073 :)
i see? but it doesn't seem to work then? or am i wrong? low number should be good no? :shrug:
eva2000
12-01-2007, 10:14 AM
Well theory is my cpu might be a LN2 gem.. with no cold bug and scale like a mother f##ker LOL
Air max FSB is 470-475FSB at default CPU PLL 1.5v so potentially good FSB under sub zero ???
Or i just am unlucky heh
BeardyMan
12-01-2007, 10:22 AM
Well theory is my cpu might be a LN2 gem.. with no cold bug and scale like a mother f##ker LOL
Air max FSB is 470-475FSB at default CPU PLL 1.5v so potentially good FSB under sub zero ???
Or i just am unlucky heh
Have you already tried to compare it's VID with others?
Also are you afraid of pushing volt's true it? :D
eva2000
12-01-2007, 12:11 PM
i don't think coretemp VID is correct even for 0.9.5.6 version
when vcore = AUTO my QX9650 is using 1.208v vcore so VID probably 1.2375v
afraid of volts ? not really but i won't be shoving 1.8v on air LOL
EXPANDER
12-02-2007, 02:03 PM
Good clock:clap: