PDA

View Full Version : Mobile Platform Wars: AMD vs. Intel


safan80
10-05-2007, 10:30 PM
http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3117

AMD has fallen on some hard times, dating back to the launch of Intel's Core 2 lineup in the fall of 2006. Many enthusiasts have been feeling quite anxious, holding out hope that Barcelona would mark the return of yesterday's AMD, where the K8 architecture basically scored a knockout punch for the underdog, but the chances of that occurring are becoming increasingly unlikely. At least in terms of raw performance, Intel has a roadmap in place that should keep the heavyweight belt firmly in their grasp. However, as many people are fond of pointing out, performance isn't everything. Is there some truth to the statement, or is it merely a phrase that serves as a convenient excuse? That's what we're here to find out.

It's no secret that the mobile PC market trails the desktop and server markets quite a bit in terms of computational power. Quad-core desktop systems are becoming increasingly common, and octal-core workstations and servers are more affordable than ever before. Bounce back to the mobile market and you will find plenty of dual-core offerings, but only at lower clock speeds. Laptops also come with slower memory, hard drives (with the exception of the new solid-state models), graphics chips, and system buses. Not surprisingly, for about $1500 you can build a high-quality desktop system that is capable of outperforming even the fastest notebook currently on the market. On the other hand, you can't easily take such a system on the road with you - and you certainly can't use it in an airplane or car. And if you want to talk about performance per watt, many notebooks are able to offer competitive performance to desktop systems that consume two or three times as much power

Jacky
10-06-2007, 04:00 AM
"If you are concerned with mobile CPU performance, AMD is essentially unable to compete at all with Intel's current Core 2 Duo laptops."
"...we would recommend most spend the extra money to get a Core 2 Duo notebook."

Btw Griffin was the worst Idea AMD has ever had. Mobile is only going to get worse from here on for AMD..

MAS
10-06-2007, 06:13 AM
as for laptops cpu is not the main part here

Core 2 Duo with intel integrated videocard is definitly worse for many users than Turion X2 with X1300 though both have equal price

Merom of course is much faster, but who buys notebook looking only at cpu?

Hornet331
10-06-2007, 07:50 AM
as for laptops cpu is not the main part here

Core 2 Duo with intel integrated videocard is definitly worse for many users than Turion X2 with X1300 though both have equal price

Merom of course is much faster, but who buys notebook looking only at cpu?

uhm, everyone how gives a :banana::banana::banana::banana: about playing games on notebooks aka business...

also my next notebook will be a subnotebook and i dont care about graphic power. IGP is enough for word processing and watching movies. (even h264 contet) :yepp:

Shintai
10-06-2007, 08:09 AM
I like how one is a 15.4" and another is a 14"...

FischOderAal
10-06-2007, 09:05 AM
as for laptops cpu is not the main part here

Core 2 Duo with intel integrated videocard is definitly worse for many users than Turion X2 with X1300 though both have equal price

Merom of course is much faster, but who buys notebook looking only at cpu?

ppl like me who only use notebooks for office work. my MacBook has GMA950 and it's sufficient.

alucasa
10-06-2007, 09:14 AM
I'd rather have more CPU power for my laptop than GPU power as I don't use laptop to play games.