twinmos 3200 @ 3,2,2,2.0???

[Azh_fx]

just got my memory today and was playing around.
now @ 1:1 ratio i can get to 199fsb
at 200fsb 1:1 it craps out in windows (something about physical dump etc)
( i havent done the vdd mod yet, but will be done soon)
now i was messing about and tried 200fsb with 83% so the resultant gives 166.
now @ these settings im able to run 217fb (434mhz)
@ 3,2,2,2.0 it shows as 434mhz in sandra 2003
anything lower windows craps out,
@ 3,2,2,2.0 3d mark clears, im currently in 20 mins in prime 95
no errors. (seems very stable at the moment)

im currently running a xp2400 with a abit 8rda+
(new 1700 coming in monday hopefully)

any thoughts?

[celemine1Gig]

My thought is as follows:

Why run the memory at 2.0-2-2-3, when 2.0-2-2-7 is faster???:toast:

[Azh_fx]

:confused:
i dont get it?

3,2,2,2.0 thought that was tighter!

u on drugs?
or am i? lol

[celemine1Gig]

Yes, 2.0-2-2-3 is tighter, but on nforce2 boards 2.0-2-2-7 is simply faster, due to some strange reason. Test it! You'll see what I'm talking about.;)

[felix88]

i believe JCViggen did a bunch of testing on this and found that 2-2-2-7 was fastest on Nforce2 boards.

which chips does your PC3200 have? i've got CH-5 and i haven't had much luck getting my tRCD at anything more agressive than 3.

[Azh_fx]

i also have the winbond ones.
after doing some 3dmark testing, the 7,2,2,2.0 gives about 30marks more!

:banana:

[Lunatic]

i think i will try this, in some swedish forums everyone says that 11 is better than 7 on nforce. Will try both and test performance :toast:

[Azh_fx]

now that i can do 434 @ that 200 fsb / 83%
will i obtain 434mhz @ 1:1 after the vdd mod?


@ 434 200/83% i get 2800 in sandra
i was hoping to hit 3500 in sandra @ least.

[antipop]

Originally posted by Lunatic
i think i will try this, in some swedish forums everyone says that 11 is better than 7 on nforce. Will try both and test performance :toast: That's really weird, so do you advice me to set my ram @7-2-2-2 or 11-2-2-2. I'm actually @5-2-2-2

[Lunatic]

Originally posted by antipop
That's really weird, so do you advice me to set my ram @7-2-2-2 or 11-2-2-2. I'm actually @5-2-2-2 try both, first 7-2-2-2 and check sandra mem bench then you try 11-2-2-2
Then you pic the fastest one (of course) :toast:

[felix88]

Originally posted by Azh_fx
i also have the winbond ones.

BH-5 or CH-5 chips?

[antipop]

Originally posted by Lunatic
try both, first 7-2-2-2 and check sandra mem bench then you try 11-2-2-2
Then you pic the fastest one (of course) :toast: I'll try that tonight :) I'll keep you posted

[QuadDamage]

if you have an EpoS 8rda+, you may wanna try 10/2/2/2, or 11/2/2/2, these timings seem to be the fastest for me.

[antipop]

Originally posted by antipop
I'll try that tonight :) I'll keep you posted
As promised http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14892

[Lunatic]

Originally posted by antipop
As promised http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14892 nice :toast:
I wonder why 11 is teh best

[antipop]

Originally posted by Lunatic
nice :toast:
I wonder why 11 is teh best I strickly have no idea :confused:

[Jeff]

Because it's one better than 10. :)

[Lunatic]

Originally posted by Jeff
Because it's one better than 10. :) Lol :p: