PDA

View Full Version : Aquamark 3 on WinXP-64


STEvil
05-28-2007, 10:23 PM
Anyone have any idea how to get it to run in a 64-bit environment? Direcpll.dll addition doesnt help, running in compatability mode wont go...

:shrug:

lowfat
06-04-2007, 03:18 PM
Same issue here, When i try to open the program it does absolutely nothing. No error, not running in Task Manager.

Dualist
06-05-2007, 11:21 AM
It's not written for it and it's no longer supported, they stopped writing for it ages ago :(

lowfat
06-05-2007, 04:12 PM
Even if it isn't written for it, every other 32-bit program i use works completely fine.

STEvil
06-29-2007, 09:17 PM
bump?

road-runner
06-29-2007, 09:25 PM
Not sure about the 64 bit version but I had to delete the Direcpll.dll file in order for it to run on my 32 bit XP otherwise it would hang at the end...

screwtech02
06-30-2007, 09:23 PM
Wont work, just the way it is, been tryin for years to get it to on XP-64...:rolleyes:

Movieman
06-30-2007, 09:36 PM
Steve: Had the same issue when I tried to run it on the clover with win2K3 64 bit..:( Just does nothing..Except give you an error message the next time you boot the machine.

STEvil
06-30-2007, 10:48 PM
we should try and contact a dev.

vanovich
07-02-2007, 02:49 PM
can anyone be so kind an give me a link to the wind xp 32 Direcpll.dll . my 2900xt wont complete the test .

STEvil
07-02-2007, 10:32 PM
You can just delete it.

Here is another thread with it: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106517&highlight=aquamark+direcpll.dll

lowfat
07-02-2007, 10:52 PM
It also does not work in Vista 64-bit.

STEvil
11-01-2007, 11:35 PM
bump time

newls1
11-18-2007, 07:49 AM
Bump again, any fix for this issue?

Bootsy
06-21-2008, 02:54 PM
revived form the dead

here it is ,runs on xp\vista64. scores seem low

STEvil
06-21-2008, 07:39 PM
What did you do to get it to run?

Bootsy
06-22-2008, 03:45 AM
whoops forgot the link.:)

http://www.geocities.com/superxpfx/Aquamark_Vista64-Bit_Patch.html


Make sure you copy .exe and .dlll file included in the download to your aquamark install folder.

screwtech02
06-22-2008, 08:00 AM
Nice!!

STEvil
06-22-2008, 07:39 PM
Awesome, thanks!!!!

ex2cib
06-22-2008, 08:20 PM
well, now that you can run aquamark again , post some scores

cadaveca
06-22-2008, 08:26 PM
NO point, it's still whacked...like more than 80k less than XP32.

STEvil
06-23-2008, 01:49 AM
53k on overclocked 8400gs (650/1622/415 or something like that) with no image quality tweaks.

I think thats pretty close to what I was getting on XP-32 with it... on a way faster motherboard (16x instead of 4x!)

cadaveca
06-23-2008, 02:04 AM
Multi-card plagues me..but renaming the .exe does wonders ;)

ex2cib
06-23-2008, 08:56 AM
my highest so far with e8400 and 8800GTX.

e8400 @ 4250 5:6 divider

ram @ 567 5-5-5-15

GTX clocks arn't so great.

624/1571/1052

i remember trying to get 80k back when i had an a64 and 6600GT. i think i finished around 79.9k:rofl:

i do like only having to wait less than a minute for the benchmark to finish now:yepp:

i almost want to put my 6600GT back in my computer for a quick run, just to see what i could score with it

edit: run on vista x64

jcool
06-23-2008, 10:13 AM
AM3 finally x64 capable? Wow, I didn't think I'd live to see that day.
Downloading now :D

STEvil
06-28-2008, 11:05 PM
Ran it on my X1950XTX @ 702/900 backed by E4300 @ 2.5ghz and 2x1GB @ 280mhz 4-4-4-12-1T on Asrock 775Dual-VSTA....

97K.

The trick is to run the bench no less than two times and you'll get scores similar to what XP-32 used to give it seems.

EDIT - no image quality tweaks. That was a straight up standard run.

jcool
06-29-2008, 10:47 AM
Hm, I got 180k on first run but didn't run it a second time. Looks weird though, everything is so fast you can hardly see it.

STEvil
06-29-2008, 10:05 PM
Bah, stupid X1950XTX sucks.. cant get the core over 720 even with 1.58v.

loonym
06-30-2008, 03:57 AM
Great post Bootsy, thanks!!!
http://images6.theimagehosting.com/amx64.th.jpg (http://server6.theimagehosting.com/image.php?img=amx64.jpg)

jcool
07-01-2008, 02:44 AM
Bah, stupid X1950XTX sucks.. cant get the core over 720 even with 1.58v.

Ha, mine used to run better:

http://de.geocities.com/spymaster2k4/Pics/3dm06.JPG

Was watercooled though.. but died on me while surfing the web at 38C core :rolleyes:
Remember my Z7S WS Thread? The bios pics with the red dots all over it? That's her... :shakes:

So be careful with those voltages. I only upped them for short benches and was on water, and see what happened.

STEvil
07-01-2008, 03:04 PM
I'm on stock cooling, havent even pulled the heatsink off to make it sit good yet lol ;)

Loads 70-75c at 100% fan

BulldogPO
07-14-2008, 07:36 AM
I got to test that on 64bit Vista