Gautam
03-28-2007, 06:43 PM
This a topic that's always bothered me, and seems to confuse me more the further I try to make sense of it.
I've read some people quoting that you can convert about 7000 btu to 1 hp, and others 12000. According to google (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=g93&q=horsepower+to+btu%2Fhr&btnG=Search) and some other sites, its only about 2500. :confused:
However, even barring the apparent inconsistency in conversion factors, how can a capacity rating on a compressor possibly mean anything unless its tied to a temperature?
For example, looking at the data sheet (http://rc.danfoss.com/TechnicalInfo/literature/manuals/06/nf11fx_steel_r134a_115v_60hz_12-2005_ed402g122.pdf) for the NF11FX, its rated at over 4500 btu/hr at +45f, translating to nearly 2 hp, but at -30, a significantly tinier rating of 500 btu/hr or only 1/4 hp.
If one looks at minimum rated temp, the inferior NF9FX (http://rc.danfoss.com/TechnicalInfo/literature/manuals/06/NF9FX_R134a_115V_60Hz_07-03_Cd43r822.pdf) actually looks superior, because its minimum rated temperature is 10f higher, but its capacity at this temperature is also higher.
Which rating has more meaning, if any? And which do people talk about when quoting horsepower figures?
Sorry for this newbie question, but I'm thoroughly confused here.
I've read some people quoting that you can convert about 7000 btu to 1 hp, and others 12000. According to google (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=g93&q=horsepower+to+btu%2Fhr&btnG=Search) and some other sites, its only about 2500. :confused:
However, even barring the apparent inconsistency in conversion factors, how can a capacity rating on a compressor possibly mean anything unless its tied to a temperature?
For example, looking at the data sheet (http://rc.danfoss.com/TechnicalInfo/literature/manuals/06/nf11fx_steel_r134a_115v_60hz_12-2005_ed402g122.pdf) for the NF11FX, its rated at over 4500 btu/hr at +45f, translating to nearly 2 hp, but at -30, a significantly tinier rating of 500 btu/hr or only 1/4 hp.
If one looks at minimum rated temp, the inferior NF9FX (http://rc.danfoss.com/TechnicalInfo/literature/manuals/06/NF9FX_R134a_115V_60Hz_07-03_Cd43r822.pdf) actually looks superior, because its minimum rated temperature is 10f higher, but its capacity at this temperature is also higher.
Which rating has more meaning, if any? And which do people talk about when quoting horsepower figures?
Sorry for this newbie question, but I'm thoroughly confused here.