PDA

View Full Version : ASUS Striker Extreme


sladesurfer
12-05-2006, 04:45 PM
:) http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTIzNCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

Due to the underwhelming overclocking experience I had with the Striker Extreme it's hard to recommend this board over the lower priced eVGA 680i which produced outstanding overclocking results. Even so, ASUS is usually really good about creating frequent BIOS updates and boards like the P5B Deluxe improved greatly over time. Therefore, I'd recommend waiting to see how the Striker Extreme improves over the next couple of months if you don't need to purchase a new motherboard right away.

Overclocking with the Striker Extreme has been challenging to say the least. Our board just didn't respond very well at all at speeds over 400MHz FSB for Kyle or myself in independent testing configurations. Our results shadowed each others using different CPUs, RAM, video cards, and high powered PSUs.


The system would sometimes POST at 400MHz FSB, but it wouldn't actually boot to Windows. In cases where it would, the system would hard lock and have to be powered off. There are a fair amount of overclocking options in the BIOS, and the general stability of the board leads me to conclude that these problems are more than likely BIOS related, and not a matter of hardware quality, although that is unclear still. We did get overclocking documentation of exactly how ASUS described the Striker should be overclocked and neither Kyle nor myself could make the ASUS recommended overclock settings work either beyond our 400MHz ceiling

safan80
12-05-2006, 05:55 PM
in my book posting anything from hardocp is worst than posting any inq rumor.

JoeBar
12-05-2006, 05:55 PM
Did they bother trying a 2nd board...? :p:

Kunaak
12-05-2006, 07:58 PM
as I've said many many times lately...

the Asus 680i boards aren't for noobs.
they arent very beginner friendly and definatly benifit from a experienced overclocker.

makes me wonder what kinda overclocker did that review if they couldnt even break 400 with a (almost the same) board that I do well over 500 on, haha....

cadaveca
12-05-2006, 08:23 PM
One that forgot to put the fan on the nortbridge.:hehe:

Ron 61
12-05-2006, 10:43 PM
LOL, Hard OCP 400 FSB Wall. Someone forgot to tell the H that your better off to keep your mouth shut when you don't have anything intelligent to say.

Im ready for another review from Kyle were he straps the cpu heatsink on with rubber bands lol, yet they try to come off as the grand wizards of overclocking knowledge.

serialk11r
12-05-2006, 10:50 PM
the heatsinks and stuff make that board look pretty impressive, and they look like they cool way better than the evga one. plus it has extra goodies that look nice:) quiet and looks are my 2 priorities

revenant
12-05-2006, 10:58 PM
LOL, Hard OCP 400 FSB Wall. Someone forgot to tell the H that your better off to keep your mouth shut when you don't have anything intelligent to say.

Im ready for another review from Kyle were he straps the cpu heatsink on with rubber bands lol, yet they try to come off as the grand wizards of overclocking knowledge.

you should take your own advice..

they never claimed to be grand wizards of OCing.. they just did a review.. they got a bad board.. my goodness.

serialk11r
12-05-2006, 11:07 PM
its interesting how much this thing costs though...i could never afford that

xVeinx
12-05-2006, 11:21 PM
It is expensive, and the thing is that, while it performs decent, it's not any better than the other 680i boards, so I don't know that the "extras" make up for the extra 100+ dollars...