What's a good Dbench figure [Archive]

View Full Version : What's a good Dbench figure

PFOUR

10-19-2006, 11:12 AM

As title really.

I get 177 sec on 1 core of my 805D @ 3885mhz

Good or bad?

I'd be interested to see other scores, especially an AMD comparison.

KaptainBlaZzed

10-19-2006, 11:53 AM

look here

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=66212

D2OL loves tight mem timings and does not care about speed.
If you can set your timings to 2-2-2-5 D2OL will be faster.

PFOUR

10-19-2006, 11:58 AM

Thanks Kaptain

KaptainBlaZzed

10-19-2006, 12:41 PM

no problem

PFOUR

10-19-2006, 01:03 PM

I'm just running 1 core of my 805D on this at the moment.
I've increased the overclock on my E6300 to make up for it on SOB, or at least some of it.
What sort of power are you giving it Kaptain?

KaptainBlaZzed

10-19-2006, 01:22 PM

I'm just running 1 core of my 805D on this at the moment.
I've increased the overclock on my E6300 to make up for it on SOB, or at least some of it.
What sort of power are you giving it Kaptain?

all 3 of my DX's are split 50/50 between SOB and D2OL right now.
( i just put them on D2OL, it was QMC)

i also have a 1.8 willament on D2OL, and a couple of my families comps on SOB when they get turned on.

SoF

10-19-2006, 01:43 PM

Looked interesting to me so I gave it a try with my X2 @2850 (that's crunching speed - processor isn't that good, even with these temps :( )

136s, have to get sub 100 until end of the year :D

PFOUR

10-19-2006, 02:18 PM

It appears AMD are better than Intel in this project clock for clock then!
When I get a chance I'll try it on my E6300

gearhead

10-19-2006, 08:11 PM

I am looking at the dbench figures and x2's are around 60-80.
My A64 x2 @2700 shows 135s.
Is this program able to use both cpus?
Why are mine showing so slow?

[XC] moddolicous

10-19-2006, 10:43 PM

D2OL is not Multi-cpu (hence why you have to install multiple clients per core). If you run 2 instances of dbench, you'll probably get ~140 or so. Since it is doing 2, it is equivalent to a single core machine doing one every 70sec. Does that make sense?

PFOUR

10-20-2006, 01:05 AM

SoF

10-20-2006, 01:24 AM

I am looking at the dbench figures and x2's are around 60-80.
My A64 x2 @2700 shows 135s.
Is this program able to use both cpus?
Why are mine showing so slow?

60-80s looks impossible on X2 for me, 135s is quite good considering you have -150MHZ lower clock than me :eek:
What are your RAM timings, I can't loose the feeling my mem timings and speed is holding me back :(

bullet2urbrain

10-20-2006, 07:08 AM

gearhead

10-20-2006, 09:13 AM

60-80s looks impossible on X2 for me, 135s is quite good considering you have -150MHZ lower clock than me :eek:
What are your RAM timings, I can't loose the feeling my mem timings and speed is holding me back :(
I am running 2 1Gb sticks of ddr500 @540 so timings are looser:
3-4-4-8
running fsb:ram at 1:1
SOF: your screenie shows d2ol running. did you have it running?

SoF

10-21-2006, 01:09 AM

I am running 2 1Gb sticks of ddr500 @540 so timings are looser:
3-4-4-8
running fsb:ram at 1:1
SOF: your screenie shows d2ol running. did you have it running?

my Ballistix won't do >250MHZ with the voltz I can give on my gigabyte. my OCZ booster is damaged, CL3 crashes on any speed...I wish I would have kept my old Kingston KHX BH5 this would be killer now :( :( :(

no for the benches I deactivated everything running in the backround. my first try with everything turned on was somewhat around 176s or so :eek: :p:
Maybe I will look on the ram timings today again but most important timings are not improvable (2.5-3-3-8, lower crashes system :( )

[XC] moddolicous

10-21-2006, 04:04 AM

d2ol LOVES tight ram timings as said by Kaptain.

2.2.2.5 just murders d2ol.. the ideal combo would be

an x2 @ 2500+
with some OCZ CH-5 @ 250 2.2.2.5

that will outpace any TCCD until you break 300mhz with the TCCD then it starts to even out.

best of luck..

I havent even seen DBench in a long time. i'll have to run it
That depends on the timings. I beleive 2-2-2-5 @ 200, 2.5-2-2-5 @ 215 and 2.5-3-3-5 @ 225 was about the same (this is where Superpi comes in handy). I'm not 100% sure on this. After PSAT's I look around some of the threads here and get a better answer. BTW, I dont think timings mattered much on Intel, although I could be wrong.

gearhead

10-22-2006, 10:32 PM

I cranked my A64 x2 up to 2800 and dbench is 130s.
An extra 100 Mhz x2 took a lot more voltage and puts out a lot more heat, had to upgrade my p/s as well:rolleyes:

SoF

10-23-2006, 11:54 AM

I just remarked that RAM was highly instable ^^ I had it on 1T for months (occt, dual pi stable) but since I had the strange "no-boot" issue it seemed that 1T caused games to crash immediatly. I don't know if it was fortunatly or unfortunatly that d2ol was running perfect anyway ^^ really strange, even pi crashed on 1m but d2ol run and run and run...yesterday I wanted to play fifa but no way...crashes right after going on the field...additionally this game won't run with AA.
Anyway 2T now, Pi dual stable again and d2ol running ... who cares about games :p: :D

spdycpu

11-04-2006, 02:58 AM

Gave Dbench a try on my new CPU, here are the results. My ram isn't great, but, it gets the job done. The 3GHz run is with the ram at 233MHz 2.5-4-4-8 1T on a DFI Ultra-D in Windows XP Pro x64. At 3.2GHz the ram is running ~247MHz with the same timings. I'm still tweaking stuff & playing with timings, *maybe* I could get it a hair faster. One thing I'm curious about, anyone with two CPUs have their DBench times (run at the same time) end up with different times? The 3GHz run seemed ok, 118-119 seconds per run, but at 3.2GHz there was a 5 second difference. I wasn't running anything else of course. I'll rerun it a few more times and see if I can get the time evened out by playing with affinity/process priority.

http://chess.homelinux.com/dbench-3006-2-win64.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://chess.homelinux.com/dbench-3200-2-win64.jpg