View Full Version : Testing CF X1300Pro on AW9D-MAX
DEVIL K-ce
09-23-2006, 11:45 AM
Hello :)
When my P5B Dlx burn ( 3V on ram ) i reply mobo to ABIT AW9D-MAX, and start to fun with dual Tul Radeon X1300Pro 256MB DDR3.
Test system :
E6600 retail box
AW9D-MAX - retail@non oficial bios
2 x 512MB Crucial Ballistix DDR2 667MHz
2 x Tul Radeon X1300Pro DDR3@stock cooling, no mod's, no oc <-- at this moment. Driver' new CAT 6.9
Tagan 530W
First bench with litlle bump on c2d & mem : 365x9, mem 4:5 4-4-4-8
01 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9053111
03 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4971527
05 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2227107
First run and complete WR in this category.
I still testing ;)
Link to orb is update in next post !!
Fr3ak
09-23-2006, 01:08 PM
Not too bad, but slower than a 7300GT, right?
Edit: Just noticed it aint overclocked yet. Considering its basically a 80nm 1600Pro, I am sure it will score a lot higher overclocked.
DEVIL K-ce
09-23-2006, 02:14 PM
Not too bad, but slower than a 7300GT, right?
Edit: Just noticed it aint overclocked yet. Considering its basically a 80nm 1600Pro, I am sure it will score a lot higher overclocked.
Yes this card is very slower than GF.
I have problem's with mobo : >380MHz FSB = change strap and score is low. Also mem divider 4:5 is not working on FSB >390MHz :mad: Mem can easy hit 585MHz 4-4-4-8, but not on this Abit.
DrJay
09-23-2006, 04:03 PM
Edit: Just noticed it aint overclocked yet. Considering its basically a 80nm 1600Pro, I am sure it will score a lot higher overclocked.
Just because it has ddr3 does not make it an X1600pro.....different GPUs. Most X1600pros have ddr2 anyway.
Fr3ak
09-23-2006, 04:33 PM
1300GT is the new marketing name of the 1600Pro.
Most German shops list it as 1300XT/1600Pro.
Have a look at the specs, especially the shaders and you will notice that the 1300XT has more in common with a 1600Pro than it has with a 1300Pro.
From what I have read, a 1300XT is a 80nm 1600Pro.
DrJay
09-23-2006, 05:11 PM
1300GT is the new marketing name of the 1600Pro.
Most German shops list it as 1300XT/1600Pro.
Have a look at the specs, especially the shaders and you will notice that the 1300XT has more in common with a 1600Pro than it has with a 1300Pro.
From what I have read, a 1300XT is a 80nm 1600Pro.
Yes, but the cards DEVIL-K used are X1300pro, not GT or XT.
If the cards are X1300GTs, just labeled as PRO, the ddr3 would make them more simlar to x1600XTs. Its hard to tell...the top X1600 score, running in CF is over 45K with the cards only slightly overclocked.
perkam
09-23-2006, 06:38 PM
You need dual X1650XTs or the HIGEST yielding crossfire performance coming should be 2x x1950PRO at $199 each which comes to $399 for performance that will blow away an X1950XTX so far you'll have to check your nearest lake/river just to retrieve it.
Perkam
Fr3ak
09-24-2006, 01:23 AM
Oh sorry my bad, I thought he is using a 1300XT
DEVIL K-ce
09-24-2006, 04:36 AM
Oh sorry my bad, I thought he is using a 1300XT
No ;) It's only X1300Pro :toast:
My problem is not mobo :p: This is my girl, she adjust my profile is ATI CCC and my score is too low :slap:
This card is very strange : def 600/1000, oc to 650/1100 and only 30 points in 03 more :(
I going to 40k in 01, already I have 398XX :)
Regards Dev
milkcafe
09-24-2006, 05:37 AM
that can enjoy the slow HDR+AA :D
the 7300GT SLI cant
DrJay
09-24-2006, 11:45 AM
Nice scores!
Looks like with the ddr3, the performance could be in the neighborhood of an X1600pro with ddr2.
tvdang7
09-24-2006, 11:58 AM
2x x1950PRO at $199 each which comes to $399 for performance that will blow away an X1950XTX so far you'll have to check your nearest lake/river just to retrieve it.
Perkam
i dont think it will beat it so bad. it may just match a x1900xtx in games.
i could be wrong however.
DEVIL K-ce
09-24-2006, 12:09 PM
Huh ok ;)
This is last and no more.
Card is not good for oc. More MHz on core and mem, not give me free FPS in test.
Last score :
3D2k1 - 39847 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9053873
3D2k3 - 12333 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4973165
3D2k5 - 5676 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2227107
All score is WR in this category. I'm not happy, but is ok :)
Thank's all for reaply
Dev :toast:
tvdang7
09-24-2006, 12:32 PM
maybe a volt mod is due :)
DEVIL K-ce
09-24-2006, 12:53 PM
maybe a volt mod is due :)
I don't have artifact on screen. Lock card for oc :rolleyes:
\/icious
09-24-2006, 01:49 PM
i havent seen a 1950pro in stores. is it due out soon?
DrJay
09-24-2006, 08:22 PM
Huh ok ;)
This is last and no more.
Card is not good for oc. More MHz on core and mem, not give me free FPS in test.
Last score :
3D2k1 - 39847 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9053873
3D2k3 - 12333 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4973165
3D2k5 - 5676 point's - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2227107
All score is WR in this category. I'm not happy, but is ok :)
Thank's all for reaply
Dev :toast:
Looks like CF is still f***ing up nature scores. :rolleyes:
STEvil
09-24-2006, 08:47 PM
try changing catalyst AI to normal or disabled.
Magnj
09-24-2006, 10:14 PM
wow. Trouncing my X800xl in 01 and 03 and right up there in 05. Nice job.