Multi cores (1-16) benchmark "Queen". Your results?

[Locki]

The eight queens puzzle is the problem of putting eight chess queens on an 8×8 chessboard such that none of them is able to capture any other using the standard chess queen's moves. The colour of the queens is meaningless in this puzzle, and any queen is assumed to be able to attack any other. Thus, a solution requires that no two queens share the same row, column, or diagonal. The eight queens puzzle is an example of the more general n queens puzzle of placing n queens on an n×n chessboard.

So, because CPU now is so fast we change chessboard (17x17) and number of queens (17). You can change it from 4x4 till 32x32. So, we have a program, like a SuperPi+Multi Core, that calculate and Bench your CPU…

- Write on clear assembler and "hand optimized" for Intel NetBurst,
perfectly work on AMD 64...

download from: http://benchqueens.narod.ru/
programmed by Black_mirror.
I am interesting in your result. -) Whose CPU will be FASTER!!!
P.S. Please, write your configuration in detail: CPU-vendor-name-freq.,m.b. chipset, ram freq and timings

[JPQY]

Hi Locki,

Here you have my result on a AMD 3400+ 512Mb

FXv1.31:
F(17)=1617092 time=1000 ms speed=1617092 v/s
F(17)=4012728 time=2000 ms speed=2006364 v/s
F(17)=11760870 time=6000 ms speed=1960145 v/s
F(17)=31726728 time=14000 ms speed=2266194 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=33562 ms speed=2854868 v/s

I gonne help you a little by upload the test,because it goes very slow to open the site!
Here a quicker way:
http://www.systekonline.com/upload/files/202/Queens.rar

Locki,if you interested i have also two chess tests on the Xtreme Benchmark site!

Regards,
Jean-Paul.

[Locki]

JPQY
OK, thanks for it.
So, i made English interface... redownload it, please, from site,

[stestan]

Everything in sig below running stock mem @ 15-5-5-5

FXv1.31:
F(17)=1575866 time=1016 ms speed=1551049 v/s
F(17)=3775376 time=2016 ms speed=1872706 v/s
F(17)=11430754 time=6078 ms speed=1880676 v/s
F(17)=30622026 time=14078 ms speed=2175168 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=33844 ms speed=2831080 v/s

Thanks JPQY nice and fast link :toast:

[Fixxxer]

Hi!

These results are under my X6800@292*12:

FXv1.31:
F(17)=5257976 time=1000 ms speed=5257976 v/s
F(17)=11064998 time=2000 ms speed=5532499 v/s
F(17)=31647132 time=5016 ms speed=6309236 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=11578 ms speed=8275617 v/s

Greetings.

[Locki]

My suggestion: to be faster, make "Real Time priority" from Taskmanager. -)hrvojezg00
Call "TaskManager" by pressing ctrl+Alt+del
Open tab -"process"
Click right mouse button on "Queens.exe"
and in "priority" choose "REALTIME".

[hrvojezg00]

here`s with specs in sig.greets
FXv1.31:
F(17)=8181016 time=1016 ms speed=8052181 v/s
F(17)=18347652 time=2016 ms speed=9101017 v/s
F(17)=42764072 time=4016 ms speed=10648424 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=7484 ms speed=12802659 v/s

how do you make "real time priority"?

[qui]

FXv1.31:
F(17)=92690090 time=6734 ms speed=13764492 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=6953 ms speed=13780397 v/s

Do I win?

[nooh]

FXv1.31:
F(17)=987552 time=1000 ms speed=987552 v/s
F(17)=2446368 time=2000 ms speed=1223184 v/s
F(17)=4013040 time=3000 ms speed=1337680 v/s
F(17)=10485824 time=8000 ms speed=1310728 v/s
F(17)=30313410 time=20000 ms speed=1515670 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=48813 ms speed=1962901 v/s

its a pentium d 930 running @4.1ghz
chipset 955 , i think

Its a aw8 -max abit
2 x 1gb corsair ram running at ddr2 570mhz =235mhz @ 3 3 3 9 they are ddr667 but I had them at this at my last overclock and then changed the ram and just tightened the latencies on the new ones.

[nooh]

FXv1.31:
F(31)=13384 time=5000 ms speed=2676 v/s
F(31)=31088 time=9000 ms speed=3454 v/s
F(31)=104268 time=21000 ms speed=4965 v/s
F(31)=308638 time=40000 ms speed=7715 v/s
F(31)=1001746 time=80000 ms speed=12521 v/s
F(31)=3013912 time=151000 ms speed=19959 v/s
F(31)=8080122 time=309844 ms speed=26078 v/s

I tried this and after about 5 minutes the PWM chips were at 80c , so i had to abandon the op.

[nooh]

they were maxed at both ends. 31 and 16 , it never goes this high on gaming for 10 hours .

[colfin22]

Hi,
Specs in sig. Results
FXv1.31:
F(17)=2215134 time=1000 ms speed=2215134 v/s
F(17)=4933722 time=2000 ms speed=2466861 v/s
F(17)=10068892 time=4000 ms speed=2517223 v/s
F(17)=31663508 time=11000 ms speed=2878500 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=25328 ms speed=3782971 v/s

[Locki]

nooh
Your result very bed for dual core CPU...
Did you enter Number CPUs:2?
May be your CPU was in throteling? (because OverHeat)

So, my result on
Celeron-D 2.66Ghz @3,6Ghz 180Mhzx20
mb ASUS P4P800-SE /i865pe+PAT
RAM pc3200 @450Mhz 3-3-3-6 Kingstone 2x512mb
FXv1.31:
F(17)=95815104 time=39313 ms speed=2437237 v/s in REALTIME PRIORITY
And from Hall of Fame:
10._swoop_____Intel_P4-D930_4056Mhz_________676Mhz-4-4-4-10__17500ms

[Locki]

qui DO I WIN? Please, write your configuration in detail.

from Hall of Fame:
1.__ГерцоГ____AMD_2*Opteron270_2800Mhz____372Mhz-ECC-Reg___6593ms
so, you are still SECOND.

[hrvojezg00]

which place do I take?

[nooh]

@locki , no i didnt do that , is that why?

I will do it later ,I have a lot going on my system as it is now , but I would like to see its potential , i will do it later , i promise.

[Locki]

nooh @locki , no i didnt do that , is that why?

to use all (2) cores , you must run it in 2 thread.
hrvojezg00 which place do I take?

see it on http://benchqueens.narod.ru/results.htm
it still fill up

[hrvojezg00]

which score do I look at?

[Locki]

which score do I look at?
no score - just see "Best Time" in millisecund (ms) ; like in SuperPi

To ALL:
Write links on your screenshot with result, please!

[colfin22]

I hadn't checked 2 cpu's in the 1st test. Specs in sig.
Here is my results:
FXv1.31:
F(17)=94933484 time=12422 ms speed=7642367 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=12562 ms speed=7627376 v/s

How come the Amd's beat me? Expected only a higher clocked conroe 2 beat that.

[an0nym0us]

FXv1.31:
F(17)=4311706 time=1000 ms speed=4311706 v/s
F(17)=12523000 time=3000 ms speed=4174333 v/s
F(17)=35670470 time=7000 ms speed=5095781 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=14656 ms speed=6537602 v/s

E6300, DS3, 400x7, 2gb G.Skill DDR 800 4-4-4-14 1:1

[alpha754293]

for my dual MP2600+, 1 GB RAM:

FXv1.31:
F(17)=2471072 time=1000 ms speed=2471072 v/s
F(17)=5164844 time=2000 ms speed=2582422 v/s
F(17)=10824658 time=4000 ms speed=2706164 v/s
F(17)=31210340 time=10000 ms speed=3121034 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=23453 ms speed=4085409 v/s

[alpha754293]

for my mystery system #2:

FXv1.31:
F(17)=13427352 time=1015 ms speed=13228918 v/s
F(17)=31617036 time=2015 ms speed=15690836 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=4734 ms speed=20239776 v/s

I win! :D

JP - now try and figure out what my system is. :D

(I have another system that I will be testing as well, "mystery system #1").

[Locki]

for my mystery system #2:

FXv1.31:
F(17)=13427352 time=1015 ms speed=13228918 v/s
F(17)=31617036 time=2015 ms speed=15690836 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=4734 ms speed=20239776 v/s

I win! :D

JP - now try and figure out what my system is. :D

(I have another system that I will be testing as well, "mystery system #1").
So, very well, but can you write your machene configuration in detail... And
write link on screenshot with "result+cpu-z" and First place will be Your!

[alpha754293]

So, very well, but can you write your machene configuration in detail... And
write link on screenshot with "result+cpu-z" and First place will be Your!

Actually JP sort of told me NOT to do that because he said that he will guess what my system is once I ran the test.

So, he has to guess what my system is first. If he gives up; then I will include the screenshot and the system configuration details.

I am going to have to add the CPU-Z screenshot separately because the system is currently busy doing other things. How do you want me to arrange the CPU-Z screenshots? (i.e. one? two? more? CPU only? CPU and memory?)

[Locki]

on screenshot must be
1. program with Result
2. CPU-z with CPU detail
3. CPU-z with Memory detail

[alpha754293]

on screenshot must be
1. program with Result
2. CPU-z with CPU detail
3. CPU-z with Memory detail

I will try and get it all in one screen, but no guarantees on that one.

My system is currently busy doing other work/testing for me right now that is expected to take about a week. After that, it is being wiped, and Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 AS is going on it permanently.

The best that I would probably be able to do is to take the CPU-Z memory and CPU settings independent of the run.

Like I said though, JPQY has to guess what my system configuration is based on those results before I am going to be able to post the screenshot.

[alpha754293]

Here's my "mystery system #1" result:

FXv1.31:
F(17)=5648406 time=1000 ms speed=5648406 v/s
F(17)=11960314 time=2000 ms speed=5980157 v/s
F(17)=36667532 time=5000 ms speed=7333506 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=10438 ms speed=9179450 v/s

[Locki]

[alpha754293] "mystery system #2":
May be it AMD 8 core ~2Ghz ..

[nooh]

just got my nem system together and I will try it on that , need a day or so.

E6600 running 3.6ghz

[alpha754293]

[alpha754293] "mystery system #2":
May be it AMD 8 core ~2Ghz ..

Very good.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=51614&stc=1&d=1159163022

I don't have CPU-Z screenshot of it, but yes, it is a quad Opteron 870 (2.0 GHz, dual core). 4P/8C total.

16 GB of RAM.

[phelan1777]

hmm wonder if I can keep last place :-P

just for fun I ran it on my ex's computer.

Athlon XP-M 1900 @ 1.6 GHZ
1GB RAM PC3200

FXv1.31:
F(17)=877118 time=1002 ms speed=875367 v/s
F(17)=2225406 time=2003 ms speed=1111036 v/s
F(17)=3757100 time=3004 ms speed=1250699 v/s
F(17)=10017260 time=8012 ms speed=1250282 v/s
F(17)=30196420 time=21030 ms speed=1435873 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=51184 ms speed=1871973 v/s

second run
FXv1.31:
F(17)=891480 time=1001 ms speed=890589 v/s
F(17)=2276162 time=2003 ms speed=1136376 v/s
F(17)=3828572 time=3004 ms speed=1274491 v/s
F(17)=10287664 time=8012 ms speed=1284031 v/s
F(17)=31081048 time=21030 ms speed=1477938 v/s
F(17)=95815104 time=49311 ms speed=1943077 v/s

[alpha754293]

Here's my results, with the screenshots.

Is there anything that I'm missing?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=51737&stc=1&d=1160360151