AMD runs benchmarks in Japan... X2 vs. C2D

[Clairvoyant129]

AMD's first official test....

My god! Just look at the discrepency of these benchmarks... Atleast the benchmarks done at IDF were consistent with 3rd party reviews.


First test,
X2 4200+ vs. E6300
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/etc_amdevent.html

What a load of bullcrap.

Second test,
FX-62 vs. E6700
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/etc_intelcomp.html


SuperPI 1M with an E6700.... 29secs lol. What a load of bull. Must have ran that E6700 without a hsf and it throttled,
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/image/nadi7.JPG,


From what I know, a E6700 runs SuperPI 1M @ stock... like 19 secs? Lol, how do you get 29secs?

[Durzel]

Poor AMD, clutching at straws. :(

[JNav89GT]

didn't take time to read it
but in past each manufacturer has had it's share of FUD. So is it really surprising?
oh well!

[Plaicd]

29 secs is what I was getting on my intel 630 p4.

[Clairvoyant129]

didn't take time to read it
but in past each manufacturer has had it's share of FUD. So is it really surprising?
oh well!

Yea, but atleast the benchmarks at IDF weren't as bad as this. Actually it was very accurate.

[iboomalot]

if you look at the pic on the 6700 link

look how the conroe red bars are above the FXs green ones.

the 4200 looks like BS but the other one looks to be inline.

[N00B]

:nono:

I really like to see the test's between the 4200+ and the E6300, from someone in the forum, just to compare.

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/image/name4.jpg

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/image/name6.jpg

[Vric]

SuperPI 1M with an E6700.... 29secs lol. What a load of bull. Must have ran that E6700 without a hsf and it throttled,
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20060812/image/nadi7.JPG,


From what I know, a E6700 runs SuperPI 1M @ stock... like 19 secs? Lol, how do you get 29secs?
the E6600 can do it in 21 sec. those bench are really wrong.

But hey, AMD have nothing more to do than lying to their fanboy. They don't have anything to offer until they release their K8L.

[Donnie27]

the E6600 can do it in 21 sec. those bench are really wrong.

But hey, AMD have nothing more to do than lying to their fanboy. They don't have anything to offer until they release their K8L.


Hehehe! QFT!

[DrJay]

The 4200+ vs E6300 tests might be somewhat acurate. Notice they didn't test '01, '03 or SPi where the X2 would get blown away. The X2 can remain at least competitive in '05 and '06 given a clock speed advantage. 2.2Ghz vs 1.86......about an 18% advantage for AMD.

[m0da]

i didn't/couldn't read it, but wow... that must be a wr for the longest time an e6700 does 1m. another wr for intel through amd ha

[Absolute_0]

My E6700 @ stock got 19.0 sec SP1M, their tests are Fn retarded

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v729/absolute035/Intel/87e9edad.jpg

[yoti]

AMD market share by Texas Oil :slapass:

[illidan]

AMD's first official test....
who cares...

[yoti]

who cares...
Yes who cares (Bagra bre) :D

[K.I.T.T.]

Maybe i should post this on the front page of Maxit for a laugh. I'll ask the webmaster. Should be bad publicity for these folks :hrhr:

[DARK SIDE]

AMD speed:slobber: :D
Something is rotten in the state of AMDenmark:D :D :nono:
Liar,liar...cccccccc

[DARK SIDE]

just like other folks says:
who gives a damn?
amd is gonna be allways no2 in world of cpu constructing and manufacturing...little lies of their market strategy never gonna last long..

[gone_fishin]

Looks like all of the -insert name here- fudware websites just got the green light from AMD.

[illidan]

well it's needed right now

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/1892/aaaiz8.jpg

[gone_fishin]

well it's needed right now

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/1892/aaaiz8.jpg

LOL, a need for fud. :slapass:

[d@rkn1ko]

LOL :slapass:

[illidan]

well there is no smile for LOL

but i'm laughing out LOUD

never liked AMD, now even more

[illidan]

This is what you want:

:ROTF:

not loud enough :D

[NickS]

LOL. At least it isn't as bad as before. When Netburst was Intel's only option, it was like AMD 86, Intel 7.

[kiwi]

Not to mention that core2 oc like hell :)

[palm521]

LOOOL

i have been using amd since thunderbird ,, and i did like the architecture.. now there was a time when amd ruled.. and its time ended.. am2 is really bad when compared TO ANY allendale or conroe..

the only thing that amd is still king is memory bandwith..wich it aint very usefull against the might of the core 2 duo..

[RAGING DRAGON]

I can't understand the Japanese?

[xlink]

i can see most of those benches as being unfudged... come one people, the x2 4200+ has a 400mhz clock speed advantage. most of us are saying a 20-30% increase in performance/clock for conroe over k8 w/ 1mb cache and about the same for allendale over k8 with .5mb so the results seem inline with reality. Also, note how the FX62 is still beat badly by the 6700, i don't see to much lying going on, a bit of fudging on superpi yes, but other than that, nothing.

also, how the hell do you even know if that is superpi? it's not in english.