eva2000
07-05-2006, 05:42 AM
Yes couldn't wait for the Gecube provided card, so bought this 512MB HIS X1900 Crossfire Mastercard http://www.hisdigital.com/html/product_sp.php?id=219 2nd hand off TOX at OCAU. Thanks mate :toast:
System:
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 QPGE Step 5/B1 /Swiftech G4 Storm
Intel D975XBX Badaxe rev304 no volt mods
512MB HIS X1900 Crossfire stock HSF single card
2x 512MB Corsair PC5400ULv1.5 Micron D9 Fatbody DDR2
320GB Seagate 7200.10 SATAII 16MB
Pioneer DVD-RW + FDD
700W OCZ GameXStream Multi-GPU Psu (http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=2672)
WinXP Pro SP2 fully updated
6.6 Catalyst Official drivers
Right now stock heatsink air cooled with fan speed dynamic with it set for >55C = 100%
I managed on GPU core using ATI Tool 0.24 beta 14 with video memory set fixed at 720mhz.
GPU/VDDC/VDDQ/VDDCI = GPU/Mem
GPU Overclocking
1.425/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 712-715mhz - looking good, that's already 10-13mhz higher than my Gecube X1900XTX at 1.425v http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=103927
1.450/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 729mhz, very good i think 9mhz better than my Gecube X1900XTX.
1.475/2.086/2.086/1.486 =
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 732mhz so far @66C load temps. Slightly better than Gecube X1900XTX, looks promising for crossfire :D
Video Memory Overclocking
With GPU fixed at 621mhz
1.425/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 747mhz
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 769mhz - yup like all ATI cards seems increase GPU volts alone improves mem clocks.
1.525/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 769mhz - yup like all ATI cards seems increase GPU volts alone improves mem clocks. Seems need to place with other voltages heh.
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.563 = 783mhz
1.500/2.132/2.086/1.486 = hung at 724mhz
1.500/2.105/2.086/1.563 = run upto 868mhz artifact testing dropped it back to 864mhz - seems better than my Gecube X1900XTX on ram too!
1.500/2.113/2.086/1.563 = run upto 873mhz before locked up
1.500/2.119/2.086/1.563 = run upto 868mhz artifact testing dropped it back to 864mhz. Interesting 2.119v VDDC too much ?
1.500/2.124/2.086/1.563 = 859mhz guess >2.113v VDDC is too much so far
1.500/2.113/2.102/1.563 = 842-859mhz
1.500/2.113/2.009/1.563 = 814mhz
More tests to come :D
I'm very happy this crossfire card clocks as well as it does to keep up with my Gecube X1900XTX :D
Only thing to do now is buy a 2nd GPU waterblock for watercooling as I only have 1x Acteal Maze4 LP GPU waterblock right now heh.
Seems for it to work in Crossfire i won't be able to use another Maze4 block for one of the cards as the back threads stick too far out the back of the card for single PCI-E slot spacing.
Going to try Radiical's GPU waterblock http://www.radiical.com.au/FAQ%27s/Radiical%20GPU%20Block%20FAQ.asp as the threads come out the front/top side of the card. So can try this on the card in PCI-E slot #2 :)
Results
Well just doing some load tests to see what the max temps under load are and look at this raw power for a single X1900 Crossfire stock hsf card NOT YET in crossfire configuration!
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark05_725-855_14800_67C_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark05_725-855_14800_67C.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark06_725-855_7422_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark06_725-855_7422.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2003_725-855_25102_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2003_725-855_25102.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2001_725-855_57713_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2001_725-855_57713.png)
:slobber: :slobber:
Update:
Jumped straight to 1.55/2.113/2.086/1.564 and managed 735/864. That's 15mhz better on GPU core compared to my Gecube X1900XTX on stock hsf! I'm happy my crossfire card will not hold me back :D
From E6600 @3600mhz with 725/855 to @3748mhz with 735/864 only increased 3dmark05 from 14800 to 14999 hehe. Looks like for single X1900 CF master card only, E6600 is making 3dmark05 GPU limited not cpu limited :D
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/416-416-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFSsingle/3dmark05_735-864_14999_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/416-416-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFSsingle/3dmark05_735-864_14999.png)
.
System:
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 QPGE Step 5/B1 /Swiftech G4 Storm
Intel D975XBX Badaxe rev304 no volt mods
512MB HIS X1900 Crossfire stock HSF single card
2x 512MB Corsair PC5400ULv1.5 Micron D9 Fatbody DDR2
320GB Seagate 7200.10 SATAII 16MB
Pioneer DVD-RW + FDD
700W OCZ GameXStream Multi-GPU Psu (http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=2672)
WinXP Pro SP2 fully updated
6.6 Catalyst Official drivers
Right now stock heatsink air cooled with fan speed dynamic with it set for >55C = 100%
I managed on GPU core using ATI Tool 0.24 beta 14 with video memory set fixed at 720mhz.
GPU/VDDC/VDDQ/VDDCI = GPU/Mem
GPU Overclocking
1.425/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 712-715mhz - looking good, that's already 10-13mhz higher than my Gecube X1900XTX at 1.425v http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=103927
1.450/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 729mhz, very good i think 9mhz better than my Gecube X1900XTX.
1.475/2.086/2.086/1.486 =
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 732mhz so far @66C load temps. Slightly better than Gecube X1900XTX, looks promising for crossfire :D
Video Memory Overclocking
With GPU fixed at 621mhz
1.425/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 747mhz
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 769mhz - yup like all ATI cards seems increase GPU volts alone improves mem clocks.
1.525/2.086/2.086/1.486 = 769mhz - yup like all ATI cards seems increase GPU volts alone improves mem clocks. Seems need to place with other voltages heh.
1.500/2.086/2.086/1.563 = 783mhz
1.500/2.132/2.086/1.486 = hung at 724mhz
1.500/2.105/2.086/1.563 = run upto 868mhz artifact testing dropped it back to 864mhz - seems better than my Gecube X1900XTX on ram too!
1.500/2.113/2.086/1.563 = run upto 873mhz before locked up
1.500/2.119/2.086/1.563 = run upto 868mhz artifact testing dropped it back to 864mhz. Interesting 2.119v VDDC too much ?
1.500/2.124/2.086/1.563 = 859mhz guess >2.113v VDDC is too much so far
1.500/2.113/2.102/1.563 = 842-859mhz
1.500/2.113/2.009/1.563 = 814mhz
More tests to come :D
I'm very happy this crossfire card clocks as well as it does to keep up with my Gecube X1900XTX :D
Only thing to do now is buy a 2nd GPU waterblock for watercooling as I only have 1x Acteal Maze4 LP GPU waterblock right now heh.
Seems for it to work in Crossfire i won't be able to use another Maze4 block for one of the cards as the back threads stick too far out the back of the card for single PCI-E slot spacing.
Going to try Radiical's GPU waterblock http://www.radiical.com.au/FAQ%27s/Radiical%20GPU%20Block%20FAQ.asp as the threads come out the front/top side of the card. So can try this on the card in PCI-E slot #2 :)
Results
Well just doing some load tests to see what the max temps under load are and look at this raw power for a single X1900 Crossfire stock hsf card NOT YET in crossfire configuration!
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark05_725-855_14800_67C_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark05_725-855_14800_67C.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark06_725-855_7422_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark06_725-855_7422.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2003_725-855_25102_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2003_725-855_25102.png)
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2001_725-855_57713_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/400-400-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFsingle/temps/3dmark2001_725-855_57713.png)
:slobber: :slobber:
Update:
Jumped straight to 1.55/2.113/2.086/1.564 and managed 735/864. That's 15mhz better on GPU core compared to my Gecube X1900XTX on stock hsf! I'm happy my crossfire card will not hold me back :D
From E6600 @3600mhz with 725/855 to @3748mhz with 735/864 only increased 3dmark05 from 14800 to 14999 hehe. Looks like for single X1900 CF master card only, E6600 is making 3dmark05 GPU limited not cpu limited :D
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/416-416-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFSsingle/3dmark05_735-864_14999_tn.png (http://fileshosts.com/intel/Intel975x/975xbx_results/E6600_1/swiftechG4/corsair/PC5400UL/268_284/E6600_2/1304_1067FSB/9x/533/416-416-4438-1.465-1.725-1.395-2.2/X1900CFSsingle/3dmark05_735-864_14999.png)
.