PDA

View Full Version : Intel's newest ES chip



CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:02 PM
Unfortunately Im under NDA ;)

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/6741/avatar42014204rh.gif

vapb400
06-29-2006, 06:04 PM
haha nice

i thought it was for real.....then i saw "insane" lol

m0da
06-29-2006, 06:05 PM
woh... i think you should keep that on the d/l ;)

does intel even have a name now for their new 45nm chips?

oijkue
06-29-2006, 06:08 PM
Is it a kentsfield?

CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:08 PM
kentsfield is the noobish quad core, this is octal.

ShiningArcanine
06-29-2006, 06:09 PM
Intel's name for its quadcore chips will either be Tetro or Quadro. It should fit into its curren Duo naming convention.

m0da
06-29-2006, 06:11 PM
i think Quad-ro is kentsfield. Tetro? I dunno about 5 cores. Theyve been doubling cores from 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 8? Im going w/octo, though 8 cores in 1 does sound pretty dam weird. I guess 5 doesnt sound that bad :p:

3NZ0
06-29-2006, 06:15 PM
only 8 cores?

was expecting a few more tbh. :D

ShiningArcanine
06-29-2006, 06:19 PM
i think Quad-ro is kentsfield. Tetro? I dunno about 5 cores. Theyve been doubling cores from 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 8? Im going w/octo, though 8 cores in 1 does sound pretty dam weird. I guess 5 doesnt sound that bad :p:

I derived tetro from tetra, which I believe means 4 in greek.

CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:19 PM
Pfft, here you guys are all gloating over coolalers kentsfield wimpy quad core, and then I bring you octal and you expect more?!

How bout, it overclocks to 5Ghz on stock voltage! Drooling yet?

theteamaqua
06-29-2006, 06:21 PM
so when can u share benchies?

CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:21 PM
NDA ends 2008 :)

thunderstruck!
06-29-2006, 06:23 PM
Cpu-z shot please.

theteamaqua
06-29-2006, 06:23 PM
so this thread is kinda useless lol

CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:23 PM
NDA, sorry ;)

m0da
06-29-2006, 06:23 PM
I derived tetro from tetra, which I believe means 4 in greek.

lol!!! :stick: duh, sorry i was thinking of penta for some reason. tetra like tetrahedral duh. sorry about that.

we want 16 cores. will that be the eh... kentsfield's older brother huh?

ShiningArcanine
06-29-2006, 06:24 PM
NDA ends 2008 :)

I really doubt that Intel even has its 2008 micoarchitecture (the one after Conroe's architecture) working in its labs yet.

CompGeek
06-29-2006, 06:25 PM
I am in the lap of the intel CEO...

Err...! I mean, i have connections.

nn_step
06-29-2006, 06:40 PM
I am in the lap of the intel CEO...

Err...! I mean, i have connections.
Yeah and I have a sixty trillion core processor :rolleyes:
unfortunatly I am under AMD NDA till 2150

thunderstruck!
06-29-2006, 08:28 PM
I am in the lap of the intel CEO...

Err...! I mean, i have connections.
Are you saying you're sleeping with the CEO of Intel? Details please.

PkG.1337
06-29-2006, 08:29 PM
COMPGEEK is right
Intel Core 3 Octo is the real name (but logo above is chopped as you can see)
based on Nehalem 45nm 8-core 8Mb shared cache
CSI disabled
Spi1M WR @ Nehalem 2.66 stock
Here is a nice way of getting around the NDA, say its fake,lol
ok this might be fake
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/4521/nehalem2custom3im.jpg

Bloody_Sorcerer
06-29-2006, 08:31 PM
I am in the lap of the intel CEO...

Err...! I mean, i have connections.
sigged ;)

PkG, is that real? It validates correctly... O_O

nn_step
06-29-2006, 08:52 PM
COMPGEEK is right
Intel Core 3 Octo is the real name (but logo above is chopped as you can see)
based on Nehalem 45nm 8-core 8Mb shared cache
CSI disabled
Spi1M WR @ Nehalem 2.66 stock
Here is a nice way of getting around the NDA, say its fake,lol
ok this might be fake
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/4521/nehalem2custom3im.jpg
but strangely the Check sum Validation result:
Checksum matches!
Which means SuperPI is now eithier faked :eek:
or it is possibly real....

RyderOCZ
06-29-2006, 08:59 PM
but strangely the Check sum Validation result:
Checksum matches!
Which means SuperPI is now eithier faked :eek:
or it is possibly real....444 FSB with a bus speed of 1333?? 444 x 4 = 1776....strange.

Thrilla
06-29-2006, 09:29 PM
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/9170/omg1bv.jpg
Too lazy to mod all the non-working text

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 06:09 AM
Are you saying you're sleeping with the CEO of Intel? Details please.
lol, i knew thats what you guys would be interested in!

Movieman
06-30-2006, 06:22 AM
lol, i knew thats what you guys would be interested in!
Not me!:D Lets see a Rostetta bench with this. and block out all the cpu info if that is an issue. I'm just interested in what it will bench at with 8 cores, and thats if the current boards will even support that chip.
Nice score on the chip..Congrats!;)

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 06:35 AM
hmmm, rosetta = 10,253/46,948

Movieman
06-30-2006, 06:40 AM
hmmm, rosetta = 10,253/46,948
Can you do a SS of that? The info on the proc can be blocked if that's a concern.

k0nsl
06-30-2006, 06:41 AM
Same integer speed as my Pentium D 805 at stock...

-k0nsl

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 07:01 AM
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/5071/rosettacore3bench8ju.jpg

kiwi
06-30-2006, 07:20 AM
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/5071/rosettacore3bench8ju.jpg
:slapass: :slapass: :D

[XC]melymel
06-30-2006, 07:22 AM
:slapass: :slapass: :D

ditto, I think you made a mistake compgeek, damn and i thought this was true :rolleyes:

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 07:23 AM
which mistake? :)

Movieman
06-30-2006, 07:44 AM
which mistake? :)
Incredible numbers!:slobber: I'm assuming that either your board or rosy can't pick up the other cores? showing as 2 and not 8..
Either way, you just totally blew away any existing benches on rosetta!
Congrats!:clap:
With those numbers I think your looking at a machine that will do close to 7000 a day on 2 cores..Very close to uOpt's quad 875 numbers.

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 07:46 AM
bleh, i had disable all but one pair of core for super pi benching :rolleyes:, which is under NDA btw ;)


Forgot that i had done that, didnt reboot.

Movieman
06-30-2006, 08:03 AM
bleh, i had disable all but one pair of core for super pi benching :rolleyes:, which is under NDA btw ;)


Forgot that i had done that, didnt reboot.
Then multiply that 7000 number by 4..28K a day on rosy? :rofl:
or equal to 9 of my DX3600 systems..:slobber:
You do realise that you have to run this for at least a day and see what it will actually pump out..:p:

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 08:06 AM
i cant let it connect to rosetta, that would violate NDA ;)

RyderOCZ
06-30-2006, 08:13 AM
:rolleyes: :slap: :p: ;)

nn_step
06-30-2006, 08:13 AM
i cant let it connect to rosetta, that would violate NDA ;)
no it wouldn't :rolleyes:

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 08:23 AM
lol, you guys dont believe me? ;)

informal
06-30-2006, 08:27 AM
Sure i believe you.BTW i just typed my post on me new ES invisible keyboard:rolleyes:

Movieman
06-30-2006, 08:29 AM
lol, you guys dont believe me? ;)
Not that we don't beleive you. Just the reverse, a normal curiousity to see a 8 core unit in action.
I make the assumption that anyone that posts this type of info is legit.
We're all adults here hopefully and no need to make up stories.
My curiousity is just to see what that beast would do in a day. Same question I asked when I saw the first conroe and woodcrest.
Another point, you already connected to Rosetta, just set your comps to hidden and that takes care of any concerns with an NDA..;)

wwwww
06-30-2006, 08:40 AM
sigged ;)

PkG, is that real? It validates correctly... O_O

So does this:

http://users.tpg.com.au/weigner/wtf.png

hicookie
06-30-2006, 09:01 AM
So does this:

http://users.tpg.com.au/weigner/wtf.png




nice funny, someone said who got 8cores,haha,
according my knows,the model just model,can't be run on any machine,now:D

nn_step
06-30-2006, 09:09 AM
umm what the hell is going on?

CompGeek
06-30-2006, 09:18 AM
Alright, well, before I lead you on anymore, it IS fake. I found this image and just HAD to use it. As the first replier said, I though the "insane" in place of "inside" was a dead give away.

Bloody_Sorcerer
06-30-2006, 09:22 AM
hicookie made it absurdly obvious. you run pi for a very low number (ie 16k) and then photochop it to 1M. same checksum, same time, it'll validate; the validator doesnt ask for the number of digits, does it? one must just remember to put in the proper number of loops for 1M, which hicookie did not ;)

informal
06-30-2006, 09:30 AM
Yeah,and i thought my ES invisible keyboard is something:rolleyes: .

I feel some may feel cheated CompGeek,you should appologise to them for making them :slobber: over their (still) visible keyboards:D

And for those who :slobber: : next time check a dictionary on the word fake ;)

Movieman
06-30-2006, 09:37 AM
Yeah,and i thought my ES invisible keyboard is something:rolleyes: .

I feel some may feel cheated CompGeek,you should appologise to them for making them :slobber: over their (still) visible keyboards:D

And for those who :slobber: : next time check a dictionary on the word fake ;)
I agree, but I always assume that what is posted in the forum is provable fact. No, I'm not naive. I just assume that there is no reason to make things up or lie to one another.
I know, people do play their jokes from time to time.
Lets just leave this one at that, a joke that got taken too seriously by myself and others.

Bloody_Sorcerer
06-30-2006, 09:57 AM
AMD's next chip (ES) ;)

windows would only boot with 1 core enabled, and L2 cache is per-core.
stock clocks/volts :)

[XC] leviathan18
06-30-2006, 10:16 AM
did you really take it as real damn it was fake all over that is why its here in wamps

[XC] Lead Head
06-30-2006, 12:14 PM
AMD's next chip (ES) ;)

windows would only boot with 1 core enabled, and L2 cache is per-core.
stock clocks/volts :)

only 17 loops mate;)

Bloody_Sorcerer
06-30-2006, 12:37 PM
i know, i didnt feel like adding 2 ;)
also, who's ever heard of 5 meg L2 cache?
ah well, i like how the SSE3 and 4 turned out...

hipogtr
07-02-2006, 08:06 AM
LOL! Lot of NDAs being pushed to the limit here - might as well skip Conroe. ;) :D

wwwww
07-03-2006, 03:47 AM
They're all fakes, screenshots are easy to fake, let's see the real chip:

here's an original photo of my Core Octo
I blanked out bits so Intel doesn't bite me

http://index.wwwwwoc.net/intel.png

Unphotoshopped

I can't post benchies yet 'cause of NDA.

nn_step
07-03-2006, 03:51 AM
i know, i didnt feel like adding 2 ;)
also, who's ever heard of 5 meg L2 cache?
ah well, i like how the SSE3 and 4 turned out...
1) Lazy :p:
2) Pentium Pro dude. there were a handful with 6Megs of Cache :fact:
3) I thought SSE4 is supposed to come out in the next few years...

Movieman
07-03-2006, 04:49 AM
They're all fakes, screenshots are easy to fake, let's see the real chip:

here's an original photo of my Core Octo
I blanked out bits so Intel doesn't bite me

http://index.wwwwwoc.net/intel.png

Unphotoshopped

I can't post benchies yet 'cause of NDA.
Good one! Excellent m8!:D
hey, next time, could you do the SS in 1600X1200 32 bit so we could get a better image? :rofl:

CompGeek
07-03-2006, 06:30 AM
lol, is that ss @ like 25x12? :D

Dumo
07-15-2006, 07:05 AM
Pfft, here you guys are all gloating over coolalers kentsfield wimpy quad core, and then I bring you octal and you expect more?!

How bout, it overclocks to 5Ghz on stock voltage! Drooling yet?5ghz on default vcxore:slobber: ...I want one:)

don_vercetti
07-15-2006, 07:48 AM
3) I thought SSE4 is supposed to come out in the next few years...

Conroe has SSE4, matey.

Impressive Spi times from all abound.