PDA

View Full Version : Is 65nm cooler than 90nm?


Deathspawner
06-03-2006, 11:02 AM
Hey all,

I am just curious about something. I know a lot of people who have 65nm CPU's find that they overclock easier than 90nm, but I am wondering if that's because they run cooler? For instance, if you paired a 840 D against a 940 D, would one run cooler than the other?

Thanks :)

TaPaKaH
06-03-2006, 11:05 AM
Yep, 65nm CPUs are indeed cooler that 90nm ... that`s well known fact...

Absolute_0
06-03-2006, 11:25 AM
It uses a smaller fabrication process, needs less volts and runs cooler. They tend to overclock better anyway, not just because they're cooler. Die shrink is always good, Compare AMD64 Clawhammer overclocking to Venice overclocking :).

EDIT: Not ALWAYS good (prescott :rolleyes: )

StealthyFish
06-03-2006, 03:59 PM
prescott ended up with longer pipelines than the northwood though..... so can't say it was the same architecture with a die shrink, they made the pipes longer = big change