View Full Version : Intel Conroe Vs AMD Fx-60 --video
mascaras
05-30-2006, 08:09 AM
AMD FX-60 (2.8Ghz) vs INTEL Conroe (2.6Ghz) >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whhhGud47TI&search=AMD%20%20vs%20%20Intel%20
regards
Delirious
05-30-2006, 08:21 AM
Thats cool, conroe is definetly better on a price/performance ratio, but it wasnt quite the spanking i thought conroe would give to the fx-60.
Would be nice if the listed all the system specs.
mascaras
05-30-2006, 08:28 AM
we already know that conroe its best than FX-60 but i think its impossible to the human eye to see that diference of FPS like in this Video , right??
sory for bad english.
regards
Hystrix^
05-30-2006, 09:37 AM
Now the human eye can see 60fps. But you've to see in the future, than there can be a differense.
Nice link :fact:
GoThr3k
05-30-2006, 09:42 AM
after reading that the article on woodcrest vs opteron from intel was totaly unfair
i really dont believe anything that comes from intel, wait till 4th of june to see real reviews
n91htmare
05-30-2006, 09:43 AM
we already know that conroe its best than FX-60 but i think its impossible to the human eye to see that diference of FPS like in this Video , right??
sory for bad english.
regards
But a human mind can see/sense that $500 is half of $1000
Delirious
05-30-2006, 10:07 AM
But a human mind can see/sense that $500 is half of $1000
haha, thats called buyers remorse. It comes from knowing u could have spent less than half and got the same or better performance. :D
hipro5
05-30-2006, 10:23 AM
But a human mind can see/sense that $500 is half of $1000
:lol: :rofl:
NickS
05-30-2006, 10:35 AM
That's cool, but I saw this, and it's better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InUl4jriwec&search=AMD%20%20vs%20%20Intel%20
ROFL.
Nick
GoThr3k
05-30-2006, 10:48 AM
That's cool, but I saw this, and it's better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InUl4jriwec&search=AMD%20%20vs%20%20Intel%20
ROFL.
Nick
this is even better, because we know its true ;)
Eclipsed
05-30-2006, 10:52 AM
Nice video, but I bet the fx60 was on a good board, and these conroes are on modded or pre-release hardware. I have no doubt conroe will kill everything, but I'm anxious to see real benches when its out in retail.
GoThr3k
05-30-2006, 11:08 AM
Conroe >> AMD for sure now :)
not only for benching but also in REAL WORLD performance :banana:
willis, we already knew those numbers
we already know that conroe>90nm K8
so whats the point of your repley? :stick:
after reading that the article on merom vs opteron from intel was totaly unfair
i really dont believe anything that comes from intel, wait till 4th of june to see real reviews
OMG
hopefully kids will stop at this very day posting crap in almost every intel conroe thread in this forum ...
pleaaa...se could one of the mods look @the last 30 posts of this unbelievable guy
IamAnoobieCheez
05-30-2006, 12:03 PM
Nice video, but I bet the fx60 was on a good board, and these conroes are on modded or pre-release hardware. I have no doubt conroe will kill everything, but I'm anxious to see real benches when its out in retail.
Not only that, the AMD is clocked higher too.
Not to mention higher clock, the AMD used more matured and refined motherboard. Conroe, first gen mommyboard. They should've used FX53 against Conroe 2.6 which would be more "fair" comparison... and see how Conroe completely destroys AMD... ;)
;)
;)
gullf1sk
05-30-2006, 02:20 PM
Now the human eye can see 60fps. But you've to see in the future, than there can be a differense.
Nice link :fact:
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
GoThr3k
05-30-2006, 02:33 PM
OMG
hopefully kids will stop at this very day posting crap in almost every intel conroe thread in this forum ...
pleaaa...se could one of the mods look @the last 30 posts of this unbelievable guy
havent you read?
the woodcrest was running 64 bis os, opteron 32 bit
woodcrest 64gb ram, opteron 32 gb
etc..
this is the reason why i am sceptecial at the results of woodcrest/conroe based on benchmarks INTEL did
no doubt conroe is way better than K8
@Willis dont bring your problem to this forum
@Mine do that, search my last 30 posts and you will see that i have no doubt that conroe is faster
both of you guys are the kids :fact:
The only thing i say is that i dont believe benchmarks that come from/are performed by INTEL
edit//i just noticed a typo,i meant woodcrest instead of merom, my fault