Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 101 to 118 of 118

Thread: I7 Waterblocks Version3

  1. #101
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Not a universal thing...definitely depends on the block and the CPU (well, really how the block relates to the CPU and how the block relates to flow).

    Decided to expand my testing to the three major Intel CPU categories: dual die Core 2, single die Core 2, Core i7. Currently working on the Fuzion V2 on a blazing B1 Conroe and three mounts in on a no-nozzle setup....and I'm seeing roughly .5C difference between 3 DDC3.2s (~2.65GPM) and a single DDC3.2 at 7.65V (~.8GPM). 3.5mm nozzle should be another story of course though
    where did you get .5c? i see 2.44c difference in one table..



    .5c is that water temp?


  2. #102
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    That's on a Kentsfield

    I haven't shown any of my Conroe testing yet

    (also redid the loop, removing the VL3s and remodding the MCP350s to 355s (I think one of the pumps 'lost' the mod), so flowrates should be higher now)

  3. #103
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    That's on a Kentsfield

    I haven't shown any of my Conroe testing yet

    (also redid the loop, removing the VL3s and remodding the MCP350s to 355s (I think one of the pumps 'lost' the mod), so flowrates should be higher now)
    and so higher flow benefits kentsfields which are quadcores...

    conroes are dual cores..and they don't make much heat...

    thanks for testing


  4. #104
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Preliminarily, I think it's more of how the Fuzion base behaves with dual die vs. single die. Conroe is at higher settings than my Kents and is also a very high leakage Conroe, so heat output is surprisingly close.

  5. #105
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Preliminarily, I think it's more of how the Fuzion base behaves with dual die vs. single die. Conroe is at higher settings than my Kents and is also a very high leakage Conroe, so heat output is surprisingly close.
    how did you evaluate it to have high leakage? power from the wall? or temperatures?


  6. #106
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    My E6700 gives my single stage a few problems when a known-normal B2 X6800 didn't at higher voltage and MHz

    Subzero cooling is pretty telling for that kind of thing fortunately.

  7. #107
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    thanks

    i'll wait for your i7 testing


  8. #108
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    thanks

    i'll wait for your i7 testing
    i7 will be awhile, still finalizing the testbed....not sure what kind of CPU I want to use (C0 vs. D0, regular vs. high-leakage, ES vs. retail, etc.).

    Then I'll do the Fuzion V2 gamut to make sure all is 'well' with the testbed....and then I'll work through various other CPU blocks progressively (i7 will get a higher priority than it does now though).

  9. #109
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by mcoffey View Post
    i7 920, 1.3v, Single PA 120.3, ZM-F3's @ 1250 RPM. As far as what others are showing, can't tell ya. Proofs in the pudding and the numbers represent their selfs. CPU only loop, not other restriction in the loop except the block.

    andyc
    I think your results are going to be pretty reasonable and logical....you have a block that's showing signs of being flow-agnostic (too early to tell, but the signs are there) and a loop that has much less cooling power than my setup* and pumps that are more thermally expensive**.

    * PA120.3 + 3x 1250RPM F3s vs. MCR320+220 sandwich with 2600RPM shrouded San Aces

    ** D5s dump more heat than DDCs (especially because, unfortunately, it seems my res-top DDC lost its 3.1->3.2 mod at some point during testing (probably very early, like mid-test on the Stock nozzle based on apparent flowrates) and therefore was running even cooler).

  10. #110
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Damn Andy, you do have quite a bit to test

    I'll be very interested in D5s vs. DDC3.25s

  11. #111
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    I think your results are going to be pretty reasonable and logical....you have a block that's showing signs of being flow-agnostic (too early to tell, but the signs are there) and a loop that has much less cooling power than my setup* and pumps that are more thermally expensive**.

    * PA120.3 + 3x 1250RPM F3s vs. MCR320+220 sandwich with 2600RPM shrouded San Aces

    ** D5s dump more heat than DDCs (especially because, unfortunately, it seems my res-top DDC lost its 3.1->3.2 mod at some point during testing (probably very early, like mid-test on the Stock nozzle based on apparent flowrates) and therefore was running even cooler).
    it also explains his water temp difference between 1pump and 2pumps ..if it were a better rad the temps would have been better..and not almost the same...


  12. #112
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by mcoffey View Post
    Tell ya though,

    I'm about to get the flow rate monitoring itch So I might just have to do something about that one

    KL's back on the bench now, just filled the loop. Man what a difference in flow rate. I have to get something so I can see exactly just how much difference.



    Good theory, but not conclusive by any means. Think about it, everything's relative to one another in a loop. If I would have had more rad, the temps would have been better to begin with. Regardless of how much cooling capacity you have, the ability to remove X amount of heat is fixed all things being equal. If you induce more heat dump in the loop, temps go up all things being equal. So the theory that more rad or cooling capacity somehow offests handleing the 2nd pumps heat dump in the loop, doesn't hold up.

    It's like saying that turning the fans up higher to negate the greater Delta T will offset the difference and you'll see a gain with two pumps. I could have just saved myself the trouble along with the extra pump, and tuned the fans up higher to begin with. Same results.

    andyc
    interesting

    i await your results


  13. #113
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Franklin, TN
    Posts
    855
    Hmmm, I have 2 pumps in a single loops with three rads and I get better temps on everything than when I had 2 loopsand this is with only 2 fans on the 480, 1 fan on the 240, 3fans on the 360...I am using one d5 and a D4, I am cooling the cpu, mosfets, NB/SB, and dual GTX 295's.... I decided to get the HK 3.0 LT for the lower Pressure drop and the temps are very close! Could the unpolished base be the temp difference between the KL 350 and HK?
    (New build):MSI Big Bang X-power II with XSPC MB blocks, Core I7 3930k@4.6Ghz with HT on, 3x GTX 480 SLI with EK Waterblocks(for now), X-fi Titanium, Gskill quad kit 16GB 2133mhz, 2x240GB Corsair GT SSD's(raid 0), 3xWD 2TB drives, Silverstone Strider ST1500 Watt, Dell3007WFP and 2x Samsung 305T's. Water loop: EK HF CPU block, XSPC RX480 Rad, Coolgate GC480, Airplex Revolution 420 Rad, 2x DDC 3.25 18W with EK dual top, Caselabs STH10 white with customizations....

  14. #114
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    hahahahha if it were polished i would have given that build quality score a 10...but yeah the thermal performance is really close to that of the k350...i just wish it were polished...


  15. #115
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    sLOVEnia
    Posts
    360
    Great test Hondacity ...how is EK Supreme comparing to the HK block?

    I need to make a decision about the water block in the following days,
    and so far Supreme or HK Rev.3.0 LC are the only option to get without
    paying an arm and a leg for the damn block.
    AsRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 / i5 2500k / 8 GB Corsair Vengeance / Sapphire HD6850 / Crucial M4 64 + Samsung F3 500GB + F1 640GB / Corsair HX750 / CPU / GPU H2O / Sharkoon Seraphim rev.ATX

  16. #116
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    I can't say yet...i ran out of mx2


  17. #117
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    I can't say yet...i ran out of mx2
    Say it ain't so....If your doing testing then this is what you need...


  18. #118
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    i got some coming...all i did this weekend was shopping


Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •